I guess I should clarify that I believe that the ‘diversity’ agenda is fully interchangeable with the globalisation project: it supposes to accept difference, but the conditions of that acceptance are actually Procrustean in effect.
In contrast, it’s patriotism that guarantees affecting cultural difference in the world. Also, when the UK was more patriotic, and less nihilistic, a wider range of personalities were accepted.
In the early 90s, more people in the UK were accepting of Morrissey as a ‘British eccentric’. Today he's as likely to be painted as a sociopath: someone inherently deviant and cruel to the core, rather than simply unusual and perhaps disagreeable. That’s a huge, dangerous, change—and you can see the thirst for it from the softer and more pliable minds here who want him criminalised.
And I might remind that Tony Blair’s 90s government endorsed the psychometric testing of potential employees (both within the public and private sectors)—in the same breath as it advocated ‘diversity’ and criticised patriotism. Generally, the tests were intended to reward deference, even as they promised to inject more difference. That basically tells you all you need to know about diversity, oppression, and a related fear of patriotism, in the UK. It’s the critics of patriotism who are the bleating sheep.