The clitoris: Is it a myth?
Really, that was one of the most stupid studies I've ever seen. All involved should be shipped to Siberia and forced to reimburse society for the cost of the study.
So, some women enjoy being touched in a particular spot, and they think the most likely explanation is that they're *imagining* it??? Maybe the other twin was imagining *not* having a G-spot, or hadn't discovered it yet, had scar tissue or irritation or some other reason for not appreciating that spot being touched. How do they jump to the conclusion that the one with the G-spot is the one imagining it?
This study would never happen with men. If one identical twin has erectile dysfunction and the other doesn't, are they going to say the one with ED is imagining it? Or maybe the other one is imagining they don't have it. If one likes chocolate ice cream and the other doesn't, is one of them wrong and imagining it?
Idiots. All studies done today seem to be either totally wrong, redundant, or both. It's so rare you see a new study that is actually good.