Wonderful post, wonderful picture.Haha. He is not 44. Are you blind... and hostile?
Well, he's high on life. His mom needs something stronger.
Try and ignore Lasse Kongo. Clearly a very unhappy person. Massive issues.
Wonderful post, wonderful picture.Haha. He is not 44. Are you blind... and hostile?
Well, he's high on life. His mom needs something stronger.
Wonderful post, wonderful picture.
Try and ignore Lasse Kongo. Clearly a very unhappy person. Massive issues.
Wonderful post, wonderful picture.
Try and ignore Lasse Kongo. Clearly a very unhappy person. Massive issues.
I went to lutheran school for 5 years and it made me stop believing in god. True story.
My only issue is my hopeless love for Jehne that will never be answered. It does things to your mind.
Jehne, with you being an atheist would you be ok with me building a small church in your honour and praying at an altar in your name?
I am SO over blondes anyway.
If it'll put those idle hands to work, I'm all for it.
This is what this atheist sees when she looks into the sky. Her wonderful son!
Wish I was that good when I was younger. Some of the neighborhood kids bought a 1/4 pipe this year and kept egging me on to skate it. I told them it was 100 pounds and 25 years ago when I could do that. Ah, the good old slim young days.....
Well, just maybe you will be tempted to get back on a board. Have fun.
Oh I still skate, just not on ramps We've got 7-8 boards around the house.
Trying to get my kid to skate more but it takes a lot of practice and he's not quite there yet. Still only 6 so I've got plenty of time.
Question for RealityBites:
Do you think there is a chance or risk that the call for evidence based science may in fact stop or at least make it harder for future scientific evidences to develop?
What I mean is that there may be a risk that we are getting less openminded to new ideas that may one day become scientific evidence or scientific facts. I see science as a field for people who wanna discover things and so the same rules as you have during a brainstorming should apply. Even the most crazy idea must be considered and valued and studied and taken into account.
I fear that we are know in an era where the restrictions within science are greater than ever because of a small but powerful group of people have decided what is right and wrong. It has become a group of exclusions rather than a group open to new ways of thinking. We have to remember that most scientific evidences out there were many times regarded as madness and some discoveries came to life by simple mistakes that proved to be very lucky mistakes.
Science has been proved wrong and mistakes have been made and updates have been needed as new studies have shown other possibilities. I personally feel we live in a time when conclusions are made far too quickly and people are once again judged as mad when the history of science shows that several important discoveries were made by people also labelled mad or something worse.
What is your view on this?