Personally, I find the repeated pokes at the Queen tiresome and gratuitous. Just post the damn video.
P.
P.
I'm looking forward to hearing how Mink are part of the milk industry.
What's the difference between leather and fur? If one eats milk and cheese one is supporting the economics of leather.
best
BB
I will take up the debate on this one. I do see the smallest of differences between fur and leather as fur is generally obtained from the death of an animal for no other reason than this alone. Whereas, a cow is primarily killed for meat with the secondary benefit being the use of the skin to make leather.
Follow me here....I remember as a child reading about the native American Indians and how they worshiped the animals they killed for what they provided them. No part of the animal went to waste. Everything was used. In this sense, if a cow is going to be killed anyway for its meat, wouldn't it simply be wasteful not to use the entire animal before discarding it? Generally, leather is the by-product of meat and not the other way around. In this regard, the purchasing of leather does not "promote" the killing of the animal rather the complete use of the animal.
Economics aside. There is something here I believe. Your thoughts?
Morrissey eats cheese too. Unlike him, you don't lecture others about your choices on a public platform and demand that people agree that fur is worse than cheese or milk or leather. It's the same processes of animal abuse. Thus, Morrissey is a hypocrite in criticising fur whilst eating cheese. Morrissey chose to burnish his anti-fur faux credentialism by linking to the usual PETA emotinalist propaganda. I linked to a more subtle expose of the fate of calves, but there are many disturbing videos available. You *might* find this one disturbs you. Or maybe not. It's your life. Your choice. Morrissey clearly isn't disturbed enough by the fate of dairy calves to stop eating cheese but is HORRIFIED! by fur farms. Farms for fur. Farms for cheese. Only in his mind is there any logical difference as neither fur nor cheese are needed for human existence in a technological society such as ours.
best
BB
Morrissey eats cheese too. Unlike him, you don't lecture others about your choices on a public platform and demand that people agree that fur is worse than cheese or milk or leather. It's the same processes of animal abuse. Thus, Morrissey is a hypocrite in criticising fur whilst eating cheese. Morrissey chose to burnish his anti-fur faux credentialism by linking to the usual PETA emotinalist propaganda. I linked to a more subtle expose of the fate of calves, but there are many disturbing videos available. You *might* find this one disturbs you. Or maybe not. It's your life. Your choice. Morrissey clearly isn't disturbed enough by the fate of dairy calves to stop eating cheese but is HORRIFIED! by fur farms. Farms for fur. Farms for cheese. Only in his mind is there any logical difference as neither fur nor cheese are needed for human existence in a technological society such as ours.
best
BB