The very first news story that comes up at this moment when you do a Google News Search under "Brittany Murphy"
refutes you (People Magazine):
On “The Insider” Tuesday night, a doctor said that Biaxin [an antibiotic] and Prozac or depression medications combined can cause heart arrhythmia. Also, Topomax and Klonopin were two drugs found in Anna Nicole Smith when she died.
See, when you've got assloads of prescription pills on your nightstand and you're mixing and matching 'em, bad things can happen.
No, it doesn't refute me. That quote is ascribed to "a doctor." Who is "a doctor" and why are you trusting him or her so completely? What did "a doctor" say before and after that might have clarified that statement? Did s/he say, "But I don't think that's the case here?"
You're not listening. For two to three people combined, eight prescriptions on the table is not a lot.
The fact that topomax and klonopin were in Anna Nicole Smith is totally irrelevant. Those two drugs are among the less dangerous ones found in her system. She also had aspirin in her. Was aspirin the main cause of death? Aspirin is in me, does that mean I'm dead?
What I'm saying is a lot of these statements are being interpreted by non-medical experts, and/or chopped up to be out of context.
I'm arguing we have insufficient proof, but drugs may be a contributor. You seem to be arguing that drugs were definitely a contributor. My position seems a lot easier to defend given that most of this is unsourced anonymous he-said she-said and the real experts have yet to weigh in.
Also, you failed to address the amazing coincidence that just a few weeks before Brittany died her husband was incoherent on an airplane and rushed to a hospital.
You're right, I said all I'm addressing is the list of drugs is not a huge list and includes a lot of drugs that are irrelevant or that refute the suggestion that Brittany was lacking good medical care.
Now, granted, an unnamed doctor quoted by "The Insider" should be taken with a grain of salt. But your primary source for everything seems to be Wikipedia!
There's NOTHING wrong with that. Wikipedia in this case as in most cases is entirely correct. Wikipedia itself sources its information from multiple web sites that are far more reputable than People Magazine. Studies have shown Wikipedia is as accurate as Encyclopedia Brittanica. Most arguments against Wikipedia use logical fallacies, including "But I *could*..." and "Well, this one time a year ago..."
She had a nightstand overflowing with pills of a dozen different sorts. And you're telling us it's not relevant that she may have been mixing antibiotics with other powerful medications? Every single one of the pills doctors prescribe are powerful, have side effects, and are potentially dangerous when taken with other medications. Some of these medications have lists of side effects and other potential dangers longer than my arm! That's kinda why you're supposed to have a PRESCRIPTION and a doctor's guidance before you take them.
No, she didn't have a nightstand overflowing with pills. "They" had a nightstand with a reasonable amount of pills. We don't know which of those drugs Brittany was actually taking at that moment. It's entirely irrelevant to discuss antibiotics or any other drugs that belonged to her husband or where use had been discontinued.
Obviously she had a prescription and doctor's guidance or she wouldn't have had the drugs.
The initial discussion was about accidental overdose and negligent caretakers. Most of these drugs do not suggest accidental overdose. Nor does the several days of vomiting suggest accidental overdose. The pharmaceutical evidence at the moment does not *yet* suggest another Michael Jackson, Heath Ledger or Anna Nicole Smith, as the symptoms, details and drugs are different.