I
I Want A Jelly Donut
Guest
CHILL: "Who knew that (rightfully) thinking Quarry is a lowpoint in Morrissey's career and an utterly inconsequential, forgettable album means I hate the man? What a fantastically sophisticated logical deduction."
QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS FOR CHILL:
Can you name five albums released in 2004 that are more "consequential" and less "forgettable" than "You Are The Quarry"?
I believe whatever 2004 albums you list as more relevant than "You Are The Quarry" could be proven to be "utterly inconsequencial" to 99.9999% of the population of the world. We're not in the days of everyone of all ages knowing Elvis' hits, or the Beatles changing the the culture after playing on Ed Sullivan. You can't find a single person over 16 who knows the songs in the American Top 10 nowadays.
Have you thrown your copy of "You Are The Quarry" in the trash? Do you really think it'll be a forgotten album? Did you not attend a Morrissey concert this tour? If you did, were the songs he sang from the new album "utterly" irrelevant to you, and you were just there for the oldies? You sat in your seat unmoved? You don't know the words to any of the new songs by heart? (If you do know the words, that would suggest you've listened to the songs many times and they have been of "consequence" to you.)
The proof that the album is consequential to some people is right in front of your face, on the Morrissey boards. Many people like it. Some even love it. Some will listen to it for the rest of their lives. To them, it is a good or even great album. You act like a person can be "right" or "wrong" about whether an album is good, but that's nonsense. If someone likes a song, to that person is it a good song.
It is also not proving to be a career "lowpoint," seeing how the album is the foundation of his middle-aged comeback, something that is extremely difficult to pull of in the pop music world. He has a happy record label, is on more magazine covers than ever, more and more bands suddenly cite him as an influence, and he has successfully emerged from the abyss.
Thanks to the success of "You Are The Quarry," sales are increasing for his back catalog (apparently some Morrissey newbies liked what they heard and went back for more), and he is set for a whole string of albums to cap his career.
If you hate the songs on the album, I guess that doesn't mean much for how you feel about the album. But it's hard to call something a career lowpoint when it obviously will be regarded by most as one of his high points. "Maladjusted" was the low point, causing 7 years of nothingness. My guess is we'll have a follow-up to "You Are The Quarry" almost immediately. His career is alive again, while you seem like a negative person who is very gratuitously trying to tear him down in order to present yourself as superior to the rest of us.
I bet you know every lyric on "You Are The Quarry" by heart, so who's kidding who here?
QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS FOR CHILL:
Can you name five albums released in 2004 that are more "consequential" and less "forgettable" than "You Are The Quarry"?
I believe whatever 2004 albums you list as more relevant than "You Are The Quarry" could be proven to be "utterly inconsequencial" to 99.9999% of the population of the world. We're not in the days of everyone of all ages knowing Elvis' hits, or the Beatles changing the the culture after playing on Ed Sullivan. You can't find a single person over 16 who knows the songs in the American Top 10 nowadays.
Have you thrown your copy of "You Are The Quarry" in the trash? Do you really think it'll be a forgotten album? Did you not attend a Morrissey concert this tour? If you did, were the songs he sang from the new album "utterly" irrelevant to you, and you were just there for the oldies? You sat in your seat unmoved? You don't know the words to any of the new songs by heart? (If you do know the words, that would suggest you've listened to the songs many times and they have been of "consequence" to you.)
The proof that the album is consequential to some people is right in front of your face, on the Morrissey boards. Many people like it. Some even love it. Some will listen to it for the rest of their lives. To them, it is a good or even great album. You act like a person can be "right" or "wrong" about whether an album is good, but that's nonsense. If someone likes a song, to that person is it a good song.
It is also not proving to be a career "lowpoint," seeing how the album is the foundation of his middle-aged comeback, something that is extremely difficult to pull of in the pop music world. He has a happy record label, is on more magazine covers than ever, more and more bands suddenly cite him as an influence, and he has successfully emerged from the abyss.
Thanks to the success of "You Are The Quarry," sales are increasing for his back catalog (apparently some Morrissey newbies liked what they heard and went back for more), and he is set for a whole string of albums to cap his career.
If you hate the songs on the album, I guess that doesn't mean much for how you feel about the album. But it's hard to call something a career lowpoint when it obviously will be regarded by most as one of his high points. "Maladjusted" was the low point, causing 7 years of nothingness. My guess is we'll have a follow-up to "You Are The Quarry" almost immediately. His career is alive again, while you seem like a negative person who is very gratuitously trying to tear him down in order to present yourself as superior to the rest of us.
I bet you know every lyric on "You Are The Quarry" by heart, so who's kidding who here?