Clarification for what, though?
> asking all the journalist who work in the '80, this is not an
> blasphemous rumours, it was just a clarification, that's all.
> I'm a Smiths fan, but it's always disapointed to learn this sort
> of "news".
Last I heard there has to be a mistake printed or a confusing set of facts surrounding something needing to be clarified...
THIS whole thing sounds to me as if someone wants to stir up something a bit late in the game; though I COULD be wrong. I often am. And if it wasn't printed back in the 80's (during a time when drugs amongst rockers wasn't out of the ordinary, and NOW it is...) and now it is being brought up, what else is it to be construed as but a rumor?
I appreciate your being a Smiths fan, however, why come to a Morrissey site and talk of such old news, no news, whatever if you aren't trying to stir something negative up on him?
I am just thoughtful today, I apologize if I seem rash and annoying. It is merely one of the many wonderful traits I possess in this wild personality I have!
Laura