T
Trouble loves me
Guest
Now before you all jump on me and batter me to death with language, i wish to stress that this is just a theory.
However, i was reading an article in Sunday's Observer Magazine about autistic people claiming back their identity; they want autism to be recognised as a way of life rather than a disability. One of the main interviewees is a Dr Dinah Murray, a British lecturer and professor, who has studied the issues and has recently been diagnosed Asperger's herself. At one point it describes her atypical development and it reminded me of someone:
"As a child, she spoke very early, was reading by two and was clearly highly intelligent - but also a bit odd. 'I did lots of things that today might well attract a diagnosis of Asperger's'. Some social interactions would trigger a meltdown, she spent a lot of time looking at the world through her fingers, responded very strongly to smells and was often accused of being unaware of people's needs"
Furthermore, i've been reading a book on the autistic spectrum ... i'll quote a couple of passages:
"Those who have good language skills may be more amenable, but they can cause small social crises. They do not understand that some things are better left unsaid. They may talk about topics that are not mentioned in polite society."
The passage goes on to explain how adults grow out of this adolescent phase much later than (what autistic people like to call) NT's (Neurologically Typical's) and continue to show certain traits in their awkwardness in society.
Also:
"Other's realise that they have great difficulty in forming relationships and cope by deciding that they are not going to try. The majority are very aware of and distressed by their inability to form friendships, or to maintain them if they are ever started ... They lack the instinctive knowledge of how to make the first moves prior to becoming accepted by others. If they do begin a relationship, they are often unable to give and take and may make inappropriate demands on the other person."
Only two things get in the way of this theory, and those are that our Moz is very imaginative, something not considered typical of the autistic spectrum and appreciates comedy... but then there are so many different degrees of the condition. Basically, all it is, is extra brain matter improving memory and rote learning ability, but causing the individual to maintain single (even sheer bloody minded) focus on only one thing at any one time; our world becomes one with too many distractions and hence causes 'meltdown'. But, i wonder if that extra brian matter might not be centered in the language part of the brian in some autistic people?
Also, the professor in the interview tells a story she finds funny:
"I did know one autistic friend who joined a monastery, but he had to leave because he found the monks too sociable".
Sounds like the sort of dry wit of which Moz is very capable.
Anyways, apologies if i've gone a bit too scientific, or you think i'm jumping the gun and having a dig at Moz. Far from it; having worked with autistic kids, i think it would vindicate him on so many grounds:
- pulling out of performances last minute
- the time he disappeared from the recording studio in Manchester and ended up in London
- requiring things to be 'just right' like the bush in the dressing room ... if that's true
- his obsessions
- his ability to remember quotes, indeed, whole chunks of text.
Basically, all those people who criticise him for his behaviour ... well, he can't help it.
I'd be interested to know what other people think (insert backlash here).
However, i was reading an article in Sunday's Observer Magazine about autistic people claiming back their identity; they want autism to be recognised as a way of life rather than a disability. One of the main interviewees is a Dr Dinah Murray, a British lecturer and professor, who has studied the issues and has recently been diagnosed Asperger's herself. At one point it describes her atypical development and it reminded me of someone:
"As a child, she spoke very early, was reading by two and was clearly highly intelligent - but also a bit odd. 'I did lots of things that today might well attract a diagnosis of Asperger's'. Some social interactions would trigger a meltdown, she spent a lot of time looking at the world through her fingers, responded very strongly to smells and was often accused of being unaware of people's needs"
Furthermore, i've been reading a book on the autistic spectrum ... i'll quote a couple of passages:
"Those who have good language skills may be more amenable, but they can cause small social crises. They do not understand that some things are better left unsaid. They may talk about topics that are not mentioned in polite society."
The passage goes on to explain how adults grow out of this adolescent phase much later than (what autistic people like to call) NT's (Neurologically Typical's) and continue to show certain traits in their awkwardness in society.
Also:
"Other's realise that they have great difficulty in forming relationships and cope by deciding that they are not going to try. The majority are very aware of and distressed by their inability to form friendships, or to maintain them if they are ever started ... They lack the instinctive knowledge of how to make the first moves prior to becoming accepted by others. If they do begin a relationship, they are often unable to give and take and may make inappropriate demands on the other person."
Only two things get in the way of this theory, and those are that our Moz is very imaginative, something not considered typical of the autistic spectrum and appreciates comedy... but then there are so many different degrees of the condition. Basically, all it is, is extra brain matter improving memory and rote learning ability, but causing the individual to maintain single (even sheer bloody minded) focus on only one thing at any one time; our world becomes one with too many distractions and hence causes 'meltdown'. But, i wonder if that extra brian matter might not be centered in the language part of the brian in some autistic people?
Also, the professor in the interview tells a story she finds funny:
"I did know one autistic friend who joined a monastery, but he had to leave because he found the monks too sociable".
Sounds like the sort of dry wit of which Moz is very capable.
Anyways, apologies if i've gone a bit too scientific, or you think i'm jumping the gun and having a dig at Moz. Far from it; having worked with autistic kids, i think it would vindicate him on so many grounds:
- pulling out of performances last minute
- the time he disappeared from the recording studio in Manchester and ended up in London
- requiring things to be 'just right' like the bush in the dressing room ... if that's true
- his obsessions
- his ability to remember quotes, indeed, whole chunks of text.
Basically, all those people who criticise him for his behaviour ... well, he can't help it.
I'd be interested to know what other people think (insert backlash here).