"There is no excuse with the 9/11 for America. It is so easy to say "we were attacked", so we can do the war where we want, no matter if the other countries don't agree."
First off, I was against the war in Iraq, and I am still gainst the war in Iraq. However, if Saddam did have something to do with supporting 9/11, I would have demanded that my country do something about him. The notion that America must get permission from the rest of the world to defend itself is absolutely shallow, and insnane; not to mention incredibly egotistical on the part of anyone in the EU who thinks otherwise. America's first obligation is to America, not the rest of the world. I want the case to be made to me, not to Chirac, Blair, and so on.
With that being said, I never argued, in any sense, that 9/11 should be some false excuse for my country to do whatever it likes. With the exception of Iraq, I don't think it has necessarily done whatever it likes. Sense so many countries in the EU depend on each other, and have formed a union that basically requires them to toe the line, it's difficult for many of them to understand that independent mindset. I believe that America should be indepndent, and should make decisions that benefit itself within moral bounds. Trust me, I could sit here and rant and rave about my government, but such is the necessary evil of government. It's not unique in this country, or anywhere else.
Afterall, all governments are essentially mega corporations destined to save themselves. No amount of democratic reform will ever change that, which is why imo, it is best to take more power away from government.
"The Irak War is a failure, and I hope that the americans won't elect G.W. Bush again."
While I don't agree with the war, the assertion that it is a failure is premature. Enough time hasn't passed to make any judgement on the situation. Saddam was captured. I don't know of any other immediate expectation. More importantly, I don't want to see anymore U.S. soldiers killed in a country where so many people want them gone.
In the end, the naivete is in believing that people will be grateful no matter what. Saddam was bad, but sadly, people still believe the U.S. is worse which baffles me. But that's the way human beings are. Fraternity always wins out, no matter what. American hawks still believe that they can turn every other ill regime into Japan. In the end, the only wise thing to do was to keep pressuring the U.N. to enact a joint military effort. This would have taken the pressure off of the U.S.
However, in any case, I think it's quite obvious that Saddam was making a mockery of the U.N. Sanctions simply don't work. The only eventual choice would have been a military one. If weapons inspectors are not allowed full access, then what conclusion should one draw?
I'm ranting now, but I didn't necessarily disagree with a balnced military effort, just not one done so unilaterally, that made Americans even more hated, and put more American troops at risk.
"Don't worry, I know that there is a lot of very good people in america (the morrissey's fans for example) and that this country is not only a big hamburger with a big gun! There are also good movies, music, litterature that I really love. But the problem is that it is the worst face of america that is widespread all over the world. And "america is not the world" is about that. And I love this song."
Well, you express an incredibly sensitive, rationale view, and I can appreciate that. America is a work in progress, and will always be a work in progress. As ridiculous as Bush has been, he is only temporary.
As the sole superpower, we will undoubtedly do more things that make the rest of the world cringe. The only answer to this is for the EU to grow stronger economically, and to make itself less dependent on the whims of United States.