Paul Natkin: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
Example of his work: | |||
<gallery> | <gallery> | ||
File:Natkin Morrissey Aragon 1985.jpg | [https://www.ilikeyouroldstuff.com/news/the-best-of-morrissey-reissued-on-clear-vinyl source] | File:Natkin Morrissey Aragon 1985.jpg | [https://www.ilikeyouroldstuff.com/news/the-best-of-morrissey-reissued-on-clear-vinyl Aragon Ballroom 1985 (source) ] | ||
</gallery> | </gallery> | ||
{{Page | {{Page |
Revision as of 16:52, 18 September 2023
[[ | 200px | right | thumb |]]
Relevance
Natkin describes aspects of a photography contract with Morrissey via his website (July, 2009):
"Earlier in the year, Morrissey went on tour. Here are a few excerpts from his contracts to photographers ("Company" is Suffering Artists (c/o Spectacle Entertainment Group) Morrissey's management Company):
2. The Photographer hereby transfers and assigns to Company with full title guarantee the entire copyright and all extensions and renewals throughout the world (including by way of present assignment of future rights) and all rights of a similar nature in the Photographs.
3. Company hereby grants Photographer a non-exclusive licence to publish and authorise others to publish the Photographs in [outlet] ("the Publication") during the period of [twelve (12) months] from the date of this Agreement ("the Exploitation Period"),
4. The Photographer shall not permit the Photographs to be used for any purpose whatsoever other than during the Exploitation Period in the Publication without Company's prior written consent and shall promptly following the photo shoot deliver to Company the negatives of the Photographs.
5. Company shall not exploit the Photographs other than by way of the licence to the Photographer hereunder without Photographer's consent.
6. Company shall have the right to approve each of the Photographs prior to its first publication in any media.
7. Company shall be entitled to assign transfer sub-license mortgage charge or otherwise dispose of its rights hereunder to any person or entity without reference to Photographer provided that Company shall remain primarily liable to Photographer for its obligations hereunder subject always to clause 5 above.
So... I bring my $20,000 worth of equipment and my years of knowledge to the venue, sign the contract, shoot three songs (with very bad light, I might add (a friend asked me to take her to the show, although I didn't shoot). Light got much better after the three songs were done). I then can license photos to one magazine only for the next year, and I then have to turn over all the images to the manager, who now owns then and can not only use them any way he pleases, but can sell rights to the photos at any time without me seeing a dime! And to top it off, And to top it off, management has to approve photos before they appear in print! Think that is going to happen with any speed? There go any deadlines! I did see about 4 photographers at the show, and wanted to ask them why they signed this horrible contract, but they were too far away!"
Example of his work:
Discogs Information
Profile
Photographer, based in Chicago, USA.
Owner of Photo Reserve Inc..
External Links