Would a Smiths reunion be a good thing?

Discussion in 'General Discussion archive 2012 (read-only)' started by Peterb, Oct 5, 2012.

?

Would a Smiths reunion be a good thing?

  1. Yes

    12 vote(s)
    27.3%
  2. No

    32 vote(s)
    72.7%
  1. 123xyz

    123xyz Well-Known Member Subscriber

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2011
    Messages:
    1,690
    Location:
    A place
    Someone raised an interesting question earlier - has any reformed "super-group" ( sorry ) ever produced worthwhile original music following their reunion ? I can't see Marr knocking out the hits given his track record over the last decade or so.

    As for Moz , regardless of whatever groovy tunes Marr walked in with , surely he would interpret ( and quite understandably) the reformation as a repudiation of almost everything he's said/sung in the last fifteen years ? That he was , in fact, not "OK by himself" ... ?
     
    Last edited: Oct 10, 2012
  2. mcrickson

    mcrickson Reckless Endangerment

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    6,243
    Magazine and Public Image Limited to name two.
     
  3. Peterb

    Peterb Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2011
    Messages:
    2,586
    I don't remember the Magazine reunion and yeah, Public Image was a good one.
    I think these reunions can take place for one of 2 reasons, it's musically the way they want to go or their career is at dead stop and the money would be nice. If the Smiths do it, which of those 2 do you think would be the motive?
     
  4. 123xyz

    123xyz Well-Known Member Subscriber

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2011
    Messages:
    1,690
    Location:
    A place
    I don't know that I'd quite put Magazine in that category ( in terms of status ) ?
     
  5. Rourkesdrift

    Rourkesdrift New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2012
    Messages:
    7
    Surely The Smiths legacy is so cherished because the actual work has never been tarnished. The story is complete like all the best bands, Beatles, Jam etc. And I agree with all those who say any reunion must include Andy and Mike 'cos without out them it just ain't The Smiths. I can play those bass lines but who would want to see me do it, and by implication, anyone else? Keep it pure I say. Just seen a picture of the Beach Boys in the paper today...don't want our precious Smiths looking old and doddery purely for the pension plan payments. They are too good for that fate.
     
  6. mcrickson

    mcrickson Reckless Endangerment

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    6,243
    Listen to "The Correct Use of Soap," then get back to me.
     
  7. Skylarker

    Skylarker Guest

    Great, great band.

     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 15, 2016
  8. Helen Bach

    Helen Bach New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2006
    Messages:
    731
    They will never return in any form at any time in any place. Or so I heard.
     
  9. mcrickson

    mcrickson Reckless Endangerment

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    6,243
    The four-pronged punch of Devoto-McGeoch-Adamson-Forumla (Doyle to be honest was nothing spectacular; he was a consistent drummer, which is a good enough thing to say about anyone) was without a doubt a force to be reckoned with.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 15, 2016
  10. Rowntree

    Rowntree New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2011
    Messages:
    502
    Very good points. Also, Andy's bass lines and how they were intertwined with Johnny's guitars were central to The Smiths' sound, something few people acknowledge. I saw the Beach Boys on Jools Holland a few weeks ago and it was embarassing.
     
  11. Oh my god. it's Robby!

    Oh my god. it's Robby! spontaneously luminescent

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2006
    Messages:
    25,258
    Location:
    the PRC
    67 no(s), wow man :lbf:
     
  12. Peterb

    Peterb Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2011
    Messages:
    2,586
    Damn right Rowntree and Rourkesdrift. The renunion that annoys me most is The Who (although they're probably a 'never went away' rather than a reunion). I love the Who but those 2 blokes fronting a bunch of session musicians are not the Who I know.
     
  13. Velvis

    Velvis Not a beginner

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2008
    Messages:
    516
    Location:
    Down on one knee
    Totally agree! Some posters here have said "any old drummer will do" - WRONG!
    (Did The Who sound the same after Keith Moon checked out?)

    All 4 Smiths must be present or it will not have the same sound or feel.

    They don't look old and doddery just yet!
     
  14. Peterb

    Peterb Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2011
    Messages:
    2,586
    Hi Velvis, Could not agree more about Keith Moon but I must digress with you about the Smiths. Even with the original line up, the feel will be different. They are much older now, the idea that they will recapture something they had as twenty somethings is fantasy. Look at the Pixies, same line up, everything is note perfect but they sound like an efficient tribute band.
     
  15. Rowntree

    Rowntree New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2011
    Messages:
    502

    Exactly Peterb, I love The Pixies but no way was I going to watch them once they reformed. They said all the stuff about making new music but where is it? The Smiths wouldn't be what we want them to be if they reformed.
     
  16. cloverdean

    cloverdean clover

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2012
    Messages:
    32
    Location:
    Pacoima, C.A
    I voted yes because The Smiths r everything to me, but honestly, would it be a good idea? For who? Us? or to them? Obvouisly the fans 'we' would love it, but as for them (Smiths) I dont think theyd ever agree...So my hope is just gone, it would have been the most loveliest thing ever tho...
     
  17. DAVIE

    DAVIE Guest

    I agree with the previous 3 posters. No point in The Smiths reforming now. Let the past shall stay in the past and keep The Smiths status as legendary...I wouldn't mind Morrissey joining forces with Stephen Street again though.
     
  18. mcrickson

    mcrickson Reckless Endangerment

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    6,243
    To this day I'm befuddled as to why a joint interview with Morrissey and Marr together has not been arranged. Clearly either of them has any problem talking about the Smiths, they are friendly with each other - so I don't think it would cause any arguments, and I feel like it would certainly be a thousand times easier to arrange than a reunion of any sort. I wonder has the prospect been brought up in the past and they both have just declined to do it? This is probably the case, but I'd really just love to see them in a room together now..
     
  19. Mrs. Phyllis Torgo

    Mrs. Phyllis Torgo New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2011
    Messages:
    178
    Location:
    Chicago
    I'm ambivalent about it. It sounds awesome, but I know it would be anticlimactic and unsatisfying like every rock reunion in history. Its kind of like what Jack White said when the White Stripes broke up "I can only imagine the reason [we'd reunite] being if we went bankrupt or really needed the cash, which would be a really sad thing. I would probably be issuing an apology along with the announcement of the show dates." Though with the White Stripes, I don't really care if they reunite since I always thought Meg White was a horrible drummer. Morrissey and Marr, on the other hand, complement each other like no other duo in rock history.

    Even with Morrissey's continued defiance, (if I was a betting man) I would bet the Smiths WILL reunite someday. It would be so Morrissey. Something so unexpected... and he'd play it all off with a shrug.
     
  20. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 15, 2016
Loading...

Share This Page