There's no cope. It's amusing to watch the fatalistic paranoia in people who think that the hammer is going to come down on their "people" the second the demographic scales tip. It's doom porn for them.
You can characterize it as fear of doomsday (which it actually kind of is! But maybe not as you’re thinking. More on that later). We’re talking about a very capable group of people that are sitting back right now, calculating when it is going to be the right moment to act.
They are already a global minority in the world but many are dancing with glee over the recent smashed remnants of their country’s historical artifacts here in the States. And their own government is letting it happen.
Sooner or later, based on demographic trends, reactionary shifts will occur: Think white-flight but on a large scale (assuming outright Civil War 2.0 doesn’t kick off — which I shudder to think about).
Look at most “blue cities” as we call the populated Democrat strongholds: they’re practically demilitarized zones at the moment. A lot of whites (among others) refuse to live that way (at least the non-woke ones). The demographic trajectory isn’t particularly good for that sociopolitical condition. It supplants a lot of the people upholding the highest standards of tolerance and replaces them with transplants that the left parasitically grooms.
We do have many POC citizens that are good contributors to society, including some Black moderates & conservatives who’s voices are almost always systematically silenced in favor of “the narrative.” I’m especially fond of our multigenerational Mexican Americans for their rich culture, love of God (I’m personally more like God-adjacent), family centrism, ability to work in every capacity. Great people!
I’d be more interested, for example, in looking at initiatives which assist Mexico in becoming a better place to live (assuming that it’s not — I’ve never lived there), rather than making the United States into ‘Northern Mexico.’ I mean, it’s kind of happening anyway...
But in the States, our culture is certainly more nuanced than say, Sweden. And that exacerbates the point. Sweden, like other Western countries, has adopted mass immigration and they aren’t reproducing Swedes adequately.
When I go to Japan (which I have), I like to be in Japan.
So the salient point is — to what end? I think diversity will not succeed unless different races/cultures (I think they are interchangeable to an extent) are allowed to have their own geographic governance so that their particular flavors and nuances aren’t erased by mass infusion. If we become one people, we’re actually far less resilient and more susceptible to an insidious level of central control — IMO that’s the main point of globalization. Apocalyptic control.
And by “doing it right” (or reasonably) you can still have immigration while maintaining a balance of existing cultural heritage, which in addition to being great for actual global diversity, also wards off monolithic totalitarianism and all the relative isms.
That’s what i’m thinking anyway. I reserve the right to evolve my position as knowledge and experience dictates.
www.morrisseycentral.com
