Morrissey Central "WHEN YOU ARE THE QUARRY" (January 6, 2023)

unnamed-11.png


by MORRISSEY

I am aware that the ludicrous 'Morrissey is Far Right' attributions have very recently wiggled back into minor vogue on all of the usual gossip sites. This rush is, I am assured, in view of Miley Cyrus wanting to be removed from 'I Am Veronica', and suddenly the very dated rehash of "This is because of Morrissey's political views" wobbles out - delighting those for whom I am a book that under no circumstances can they stop reading. My friends are fully aware of a certain aim to put me out of circulation, which has inexplicably become relentless even though the entire point of Cancel Culture is to never again acknowledge whomever has been cancelled. You cannot constantly vomit out the same regurgitated "he should not be listened to" dirge year after year, because YOU are displaying an obsession that you urge others to avoid. I had secretly hoped that the glorious benefit of being cancelled would be that I could never again receive a bad review, because even to give me yet another oh-so-predictable bad review confirms that I am not, after all, cancelled. But the Cancel Vultures write only in headlines; they do not answer questions; their darts aim only for the inspired elite of perceptive intelligence. The Vultures are usually chief exponents of the hate and harassment which they themselves define as justification for Cancellation of others. Cancel Vultures are unknowable blanks, and they only attack those of whom they are most jealous - because others don't count. They will not forgive you for being alive, but they will not square up to you face-to-face because they would be forced to look into your eyes … where the wordless truth resides. Worst of all, Cancel Vultures cannot ever apologize for being wrong. This would be worse than death. I have been invited onto U.S. and U.K television news outlets to discuss the situation with Miley and 'Bonfire of teenagers', but of course, there's no point. In truth, Miley has backed off for reasons unconnected to me, having had a major clash with a key figure in 'the circle'. I cannot give any details about the private fight because … it is private, after all.

Miley knew everything about me when she arrived to sing 'I Am Veronica' almost two years ago; she walked into the studio already singing the song. She volunteered. I did not ask her to get involved. Her professionalism was astounding, her vocals a joy to behold. Every minute that I spent with Miley was loving and funny. She asked if she could be in the 'Veronica' video. I was very honored. She told me that Morrissey songs are on 24-hour rotation in her house, and she had frequently been photographed in Morrissey t-shirts. Miley came into my world; I did not venture towards hers. I was eternally thankful, and even now, I remain so.

The campaign to destroy my career was originally led by four male individuals in Britain, each of whom have prominent positions on social media - and they have full unedited access to the Legacy Media. At some point, each one of them had hopes of a candle-lit friendship with me, and this did not happen. Their rage for attention then took a different turn. They want some form of Wikipedia mention as well as a future personal Index reference in 'Who Killed Morrissey?'. Yes, staggeringly, that is their goal.

Although the Left changed and deserted me many years ago, I am most certainly not Far Right, and I have not ever met anyone who claims to be Far Right. My politics are straightforward: I recognize realities. Some realities horrify me, and some do not, but I accept that I was not created so that others might gratify me and delight me with all that they think and do - what a turgid life that would be. I've been offended all of my life, and it has strengthened me, and I am glad. I wouldn't have the journey any other way. Only by hearing the opinions of others can we form truly rational views, and therefore we must never accept a beehive society that refuses to reflect a variety of views.

I am therefore sorry to report to some of you that I am absolutely not Far Right. If your wearisome echo disapproves of me not being Far Right, I wish you the hope that you deny yourself. Britain's 'Question Time' has thrown the red carpet my way six times asking me to appear on television to discuss the Left-Right divide, but I have always refused, and not least of all because I am sick to death of a debate that can never possibly resolve itself. I also refuse because I am apolitical, and if nothing else, I know my place.

I do not care very much about myself - and I never have. But the crucial point about 'Music as Art' is evident in life-changing music that has always happened before anyone expected it. The very best examples are the Sex Pistols, David Bowie, the Ramones, the Velvet Underground, Alice Cooper, and even the Dolls and Iggy: no one saw these monoliths coming, therefore the people discovered them before the industry had time to halt the fun. Now, alas, music cannot happen unless it adheres to strict industry guidelines, and this falsely assures the listening public that things could not possibly be better than they currently are. The infantilised world is delighted to stream music, but if they were asked to walk 50 yards to a record shop to access those very songs … they wouldn't bother to. However, the connection between the music industry and Cancel Vultures is that they both agree that their main job is to stop singers and bands from saying anything important. Respecting equal freedom for those that you control … is not freedom. Music as Art has now been destroyed because it expands public opinion, and thus, with the current Top 100 downloads … no bubbles can ever rise. Songs once kept listeners occupied for years, but this has been replaced by suspiciously instant stardom for anyone obedient enough to agree that babies are naturally born through the left ear. Proper artists need not apply. Imagination must be paralyzed, and saying nothing whatsoever is the only pathway to all music awards. Look for yourself.

Following Britain's 9/11 abomination at the Manchester Arena, Miley was asked to take part in the Don't Look Back In Anger event, and she refused. I asked her why she had refused, and she said "I am not into all that."

I write these words mainly for (but not directly about) my audience - who are the best and most incredible audience that anyone could dream of, and perhaps many onlookers are jealous of this fact. I have not ever voted for a political party in my life, and I have not ever joined a political party, and I have not ever attended a political rally. On the political stage, I do not exist: you have never seen me there and you never shall. I therefore do not mind in the least if you join the Morrissey haters - there is always the likelihood that I'd feel exactly the same way about you. But if you join forces with the Cancel Vultures, your only aim is to numb time, and your eyes are dead.

5 January 2023

unnamed-8+copy+10.jpg




Member @Cornflakes reminded us that Miley Cyrus actually did attend the One Love Manchester event.
For clarity:
May 22, 2017 - Bombing.
May 25, 2017 - spontaneously sung after a minutes silence in the city.
May 27, 2017 - sung during the Courteeners et al gig @ Old Trafford Cricket Ground.
June 4, 2017 - One Love Manchester concert.
September 9, 2017 - We Are Manchester benefit.
All featured "Don't Look Back In Anger".
It should be noted the "We Are Manchester" event was predominantly Manchester bands and there is no online evidence to support Miley Cyrus was invited/involved with said.

p054xvmz.jpg


First Central image by Stephen Shames.
Second Central image by Esparza.
Regards,
FWD.


Media items:
 
From what I can see, all her live streams stay up, I’ve looked around the time of the Gig and there’s nothing at all. I also don’t remember it from the time either.
It definitely happened and no not all her live streams stay up.
 
Definitions too are important I think. I would be curious to know how you would define ´far right´. I would suggest it´s being in favour of totalitarianism and a society organised along ´racial´ lines. I would detest living under any government of that kind. I think most sane people would.
In his time Moz has voiced support for Tony Benn, described by the media as far left, and AMW, described by the media as far right. Both labels I think are fairly meaningless when used in this way.
The difficulty in terms of debate and what people conflate with NAZIs to suit their view is simple:
If a political party is approved by the UK Electoral Commission - no matter how emotively people push on the term "far", anyone is legally entitled to vote for the party - if you think they are psychotic racists, that's great, but people can democratically place 'x's on voting forms for them. Should the party be 'extreme' or be seen as becoming 'extremist' - they won't get approved or will lose their deposit and be booted & banned.
People with very specific views struggle with the idea that people are actually allowed to vote for certain parties because [insert 1000 reasons they're evil] - in terms of the democratic process, those feelings & opinions mean nil.
Democracy actually works occasionally because 99% of these types of parties get such a fractional vote percentage - there's actually little to worry about.
FWD.
 
That’s a personal opinion.
The succesfull US and UK tours of the past year suggest otherwise. As does the recent discography.
how are you measuring "success". When you compare those dates, including a mostly empty Vegas residency, to the huge world tours involving arenas from the past, it would be a significant drop.
 
I mean, not really though. The views he's espoused in his personal and sometimes professional life are decidedly left wing regarding sexuality, art, work and animal rights. These are social positions and not political positions, however, there are so many activists that prefer to eat their own rather than support those of us who have similar opinions. For some on the left, you can never be progressive enough. As for some on the right you can never be right wing enough. So rather than celebrating our commonalities, many would rather nitpick our uniqueness. It's been amplified by social media culture, but it's been going on forever.

Bob Dylan got 'cancelled' in the mid-sixties because he plugged in his guitar and refused to take up causes for his friends. Guess what happened... the stopped being his friends and started labelling him as right wing. It's insanity that should stay in the minds of the zealots and never echoed by sane people.
it is also insane to claim to be apolitical when it wasn't that long ago he was appearing on stage and on TV wearing a For Britain political party badge.

Politics come into most things. Animal rights is a political topic as many other topics. Politics isn't just restricted to partisan politics.
 
not quite. Corbyn as did Blair as did Clinton as did many Tory MPs since and still doing so in relation to Sinn Fein. It was about talking. The peace process would never have happened if people had never sat down with each other and talked.

Corbyn's involvement/love-in with Gerry Adams et al was a bit more involved than the others.
 
You may want to do more research into this alleged non far right person.

“For a start the immigration will have to stop, the immigration from Islamic countries has to stop entirely, that is just the way it is. A lot of people need to be deported. Many mosques need to be closed down. It really has to get tough.”
AMW
“We are becoming an Islamic state […] the EU agreed to turn Europe into an Arabian Islamic continent, in return for trade, essentially […] My thinking is we need to reduce their birthrates now.”
AMW
“We are having our countries taken from us, because we are made to feel guilty about our very existence.
AMW
“The only reason that the mass migration into white Europe is happening on the scale that it’s happening is to disempower white people, to make us a minority and therefore unable to wield political power”.
AMW
People say all sorts of things. You could hear worse down any boozer on a Saturday night. Or certainly any boozer outside Islington. Secret recordings are always slightly dubious. But wanting to curb Muslim immigration is a fairly mainstream opinion - not that the mainstream media would report it as such.

 
Corbyn's involvement/love-in with Gerry Adams et al was a bit more involved than the others.
not really. You will find Clinton and Blair's involvement with Gerry Adams far more indepth than anything like Corbyn's involvement.

And again, it was all for the cause to reach a peaceful settlement and ceasefire. Which it did.

It is no secret that Corbyn wanted an end to British rule in Ulster and wanted a united ireland but he wasn't the only politician with that view and there were huge numbers of supporters of the Troops Out movement throughout the UK and Irish population. And that is still the case.

Yes Corbyn kept links going to Gerry Adams during the troubles as leader of Sinn Fein but as was released more recently the UK government maintained secret back channel direct links with the IRA leadership throughout the 80s too. The whole point was to maintain dialogue and work towards peace. Refusing to talk never resolves anything and thank god these people did sit down with Sinn Fein and the likes of Gerry Adams. We live in a safer country because of it.
 
People say all sorts of things. You could hear worse down any boozer on a Saturday night. Or certainly any boozer outside Islington. Secret recordings are always slightly dubious. But wanting to curb Muslim immigration is a fairly mainstream opinion - not that the mainstream media would report it as such.

none of these quotes came from secret recordings or from a drunk person outside a pub. They came from public official speeches from AMW. Do some more research.
 
People say all sorts of things. You could hear worse down any boozer on a Saturday night. Or certainly any boozer outside Islington. Secret recordings are always slightly dubious. But wanting to curb Muslim immigration is a fairly mainstream opinion - not that the mainstream media would report it as such.

of course its a mainstream opinion. Who disputes that?

Mainstream though doesnt equate to a popular or winning opinion. The BNP in their political heights won votes throughout the country but that soon came to a disastrous end for them.
 
The difficulty in terms of debate and what people conflate with NAZIs to suit their view is simple:
If a political party is approved by the UK Electoral Commission - no matter how emotively people push on the term "far", anyone is legally entitled to vote for the party - if you think they are psychotic racists, that's great, but people can democratically place 'x's on voting forms for them. Should the party be 'extreme' or be seen as becoming 'extremist' - they won't get approved or will lose their deposit and be booted & banned.
People with very specific views struggle with the idea that people are actually allowed to vote for certain parties because [insert 1000 reasons they're evil] - in terms of the democratic process, those feelings & opinions mean nil.
Democracy actually works occasionally because 99% of these types of parties get such a fractional vote percentage - there's actually little to worry about.
FWD.
All that is true, but certain pop-stars still urge us to vote for them, having previously told us to vote for no-one
 
Strangely FB didn’t get very far, even with the so-called ‘support’ of a pop singer.

I guess, many don’t take political advice from a singer. Why did anyone think they would :crazy:
 

Trending Threads

Back
Top Bottom