What became of Mel Gibson after "The Passion of the Christ"? Was he ostricised by the Hollywood

  • Thread starter seriously flawed - not right in the head
  • Start date
S

seriously flawed - not right in the head

Guest
Moguls?
Or killed by a poisoned umbrella point (Mosad style)
Seriously though, I haven't heard tell or tale of him since.
 
I think the answer is simple. He's off enjoying his money, uh, I mean his faith. No, seriously, he's probably just taking a rest. He got mostly praise for that movie, and he's still in demand in hollywood I think.
 
> I think the answer is simple. He's off enjoying his money, uh, I mean his
> faith. No, seriously, he's probably just taking a rest. He got mostly
> praise for that movie, and he's still in demand in hollywood I think.

Well, that's good to know.
I honestly thought they had shut him out after that, which would be sad.

Thank you for replying by the way, I was asking a serious question.
 
Re: It's a superb film, at least it was meant honestly.

I know, he is a very passionate man and made a film he believed in.
That can't be said for most in that industry.
Funded all by himself too. Not that he's short of a few bob, but it just goes to show how passionately he felt about the subject.
I admire people like him who stand up for themselves in the face of adversity.
As we know, (not meaning to sound racist, as I often do on here) but Hollywood is run by Jews who despised the whole premise of the film.

I must say however, I was a little disappointed in the end result...rather short on content....the main focus being the crucifixation I know, but slightly overplayed.

Anyway good on you Mel, for having the guts.

I despise cowards who won't stand up for what they truly believe.
 
Re: It's a superb film, at least it was meant honestly.

> I know, he is a very passionate man and made a film he believed in.
> That can't be said for most in that industry.
> Funded all by himself too. Not that he's short of a few bob, but it just
> goes to show how passionately he felt about the subject.
> I admire people like him who stand up for themselves in the face of
> adversity.
> As we know, (not meaning to sound racist, as I often do on here) but
> Hollywood is run by Jews who despised the whole premise of the film.

> I must say however, I was a little disappointed in the end result...rather
> short on content....the main focus being the crucifixation I know, but
> slightly overplayed.

> Anyway good on you Mel, for having the guts.

> I despise cowards who won't stand up for what they truly believe.

Footnote...I did mean crucifixion and fixation....apologies
 
Re: I roll my eyes at you.

> Ignorant moron.

Your the ignorant moron. Hollywood's "elite" is a group of people who are Jewish. Is it not a contradiction to give an Oscar (or nominate) for best picture to Schindler's List [Holocaust], yet wont even give a Best Picture nod....

*yes it has 2/3 shitty categorical nominations*
1. Achievement in Cinematography
2. Achievement in Makeup (wow that's a poke in the eye)
3. Best Original Score [this I wont dispute as it STILL IS the best OST of 2004]

....to a movie that "depicts them in a bad view" [Anti Semitism] because it might spark more hate towards them? Dont they have a museum in Los Angeles that is to supposedly teach "tolerance"? If that doesn't boggle your feable mind...............how about not giving a single nod to "Fahrenheit 9-11"? Let us break this down (as to how this is more proof of Jewish influence in Hollywood)

1. For one most "elite" influential Jews in Hollywood support Bush.
2. Likewise Bush kisses Arial Sharon's fat ass.
3. Therefore, any portrayed (or deemed to be in the likeness of) giving President Dumbo a bad name will not even be considered. Still dont believe me? Read the official list of this year's nominees for the Oscars.

I could point out countless other cultures who've suffered as much death and horror as Jewish had in the Holocaust, but the nimrod NICK and any of you (will) always be ignorant to the fact that Hollywood (guess what?) is run by Jewish people. I know none of you would not give a shit about those people, so I will save my breath.
 
Re: I roll my eyes at you.

> Your the ignorant moron. Hollywood's "elite" is a group of
> people who are Jewish. Is it not a contradiction to give an Oscar (or
> nominate) for best picture to Schindler's List [Holocaust], yet wont even
> give a Best Picture nod....

> *yes it has 2/3 shitty categorical nominations*
> 1. Achievement in Cinematography
> 2. Achievement in Makeup (wow that's a poke in the eye)
> 3. Best Original Score [this I wont dispute as it STILL IS the best OST of
> 2004]

> ....to a movie that "depicts them in a bad view" [Anti Semitism]
> because it might spark more hate towards them? Dont they have a museum in
> Los Angeles that is to supposedly teach "tolerance"? If that
> doesn't boggle your feable mind...............how about not giving a
> single nod to "Fahrenheit 9-11"? Let us break this down (as to
> how this is more proof of Jewish influence in Hollywood)

> 1. For one most "elite" influential Jews in Hollywood support
> Bush.
> 2. Likewise Bush kisses Arial Sharon's fat ass.
> 3. Therefore, any portrayed (or deemed to be in the likeness of) giving
> President Dumbo a bad name will not even be considered. Still dont believe
> me? Read the official list of this year's nominees for the Oscars.

> I could point out countless other cultures who've suffered as much death
> and horror as Jewish had in the Holocaust, but the nimrod NICK and any of
> you (will) always be ignorant to the fact that Hollywood (guess what?) is
> run by Jewish people. I know none of you would not give a shit about those
> people, so I will save my breath.

WOW!!!!

You've won my vote!
 
Re: omfg!!!!

> Guyz teh jewish conspiracy is coming to get me!!!

You mean they haven't already?

You are one of the few then.

Read any newspapers lately?
 
Back
Top Bottom