That's because they have no assertions to make, they're simply living their lives on primitive, in-built instinct. [...]
for the most part, human beings proceed through their everyday lives - and for the duration of their lives - on the basis of the cultures/subcultures into which they have been socialised. "primitive, in-built instinct" – limited, as it is, in human beings - is almost entirely irrelevant.
They [ie. the, supposedly, unenlightened and apathetic majority] challenge nothing[…][emphasis added]
again, i'd suggest that, perhaps, you're making a generalisation, here, primarily, to flatter your own self-image, rather than accurately reflecting the reality of the social world. belonging to a
very well established subculture - maintained, in no small part, by a lucrative industry - doesn't render you "challenging" to wider society, or "the majority" of those who participate in it.
you - like everyone else - are a target market.
you
really are quite the rhetoritician! ...and so "
feisty", too!
[...] I'm not arguing in terms of appearance, either, because a teenager in a 'Korn' hoodie is just as pathetic as a trendy who visits the shops every week to buy clothes which some megabucks fashion CEO says are fashionable. [...] [emphasis added]
what about those who pay a fee to attend gymnasia and who receive instruction on how to make their respective bodies look a particular way, through fear of being ostracised, denigrated or mocked because their appearance does not conform to a particular body image (i.e. one which has been elevated and promoted as desirable by very profitable industries)? are these people "pathetic", also?
how about those who profit from those industries: are
they "pathetic", or are they rational, calculating, self-serving parasites?
[...] Do you have any comprehension of how difficult life is for someone who spends their life in the public eye, voicing opinions on animals rights which get him despised by the majority?[...]
(correct me if i'm wrong, but) you seem to be making an assertion, here, rather than asking a question. if i understand you correctly, you seem to be implying that steve's life is one of unendurable hardship as a consequence of his being "despised" by "the majority" and that this situation arises because of his tireless efforts on behalf of the little animals. if this
is what you're trying to say, then i really do despair.
firstly, i can't imagine that "the majority" really gives a collective toss about what steve thinks about animals and their "rights". secondly, he's a fairly well-heeled bloke whose bank balance doesn't seem to have been too significantly depleted by his opinion on the subject of animal welfare. thirdly, steve has probably been shown more admiration/love/lust, during the course of his career, than most people will ever know. in short, he doesn't seem to be doing too badly, in spite of it all.
[...] Do you, for one single second, think it is easy for an individual to a live a life which is 100% devoted to a minority cause, facing one life-long uphill struggle [...]?
ah, you'd bring a tear to a glass eye.
i really feel for you!
neither you nor steve "live a life which is 100% devoted" to your chosen "cause"; another little rhetorical flourish, perchance?
however, yes, i
do know what it is like to do/say things that are unpopular and to do so consistently. i
do know what it is like to be engaged in political action, in opposition to values and practices which predominate in wider society. it is tiring, time-consuming, and frustrating (to say the least), but it isn't like working down a coal mine or digging holes in the road, from morning 'til night, in all weathers. it isn't pointless, soul-destroying, alienating toil, without end, so spare me the story of your hardship.
[...] If you do not believe passionately in any neglected causes, then what have you got to strive for?[...]
simply because i'm not vegetarian doesn't mean i'm not "passionate" about "neglected causes".
i'm sure i'm as "worthy" as you are ostentatious.
[...] spouting faux-sociological pap and attempting to assume the sneering tone of a young, naive sociology student does not mean you have any greater an understanding of cultures and subcultures than I do.[...]
aaaaahhh...
now i see!
can you enlighten me about the "
faux-sociological" nature of anything i've written. while awaiting your edifying response, i'll have a word with the boss and draft my resignation letter, in deference to your wisdom; i'm sure you can show me - in very precise terms - where, and how, i have erred.
[...] You're being guided by man-made logic, which isn't even logic at all, instead of doing the one thing which so many humans aren't very good at doing: listening to your heart/inner conscience.[...]
you're so very zen; i do envy you.
[...]I listen to a wide variety of music from bands and artists signed to both major and independent labels. Rage Against the machine are [...] one of the bands I enjoy.
i f***ing
knew it!
[...]You are doing what most people are very guilty of doing: judging conformity/non-comformity in shallow terms. [...]
i'm not judging, either, conformity or non-conformity, y'silly moo; i'm judging
you!
can we hook up, some time? you sound nice!!!!
HIM xxx