I struggle with the whole idea of the mathematisation of art.
When I experience a work of art, my response is strange and confused, encompassing intellect, imagination and emotions (at least that's what it feels like). It’s a bit of a mess, to be honest. With great art, I often don’t know how I feel about it at all, other than it’s knocked my socks off.
What would I give Blake’s ‘The Four Zoas’ out of ten? I really don’t know. I just know it’s profoundly moving, invigorating and that it lights fires in my imagination. It induced something very much like a panic attack whilst I was reading it one lunchtime in Sayers (eating an egg custard). Does this mean it rates 8 out of 10, 9 out of 10, or is it off the scale?
‘Vauxhall and I’ is just wonderful. Every song hits home. When the album’s finished, more than any other (solo or Smiths), I feel like I’ve really experienced something, not just listened to a bunch of great songs. I always feel a bit dreamy afterwards and at a loose-end. Not sure what that means. Certainly wouldn’t know where it ranks on a scale of 1 to 10.
I’ve participated in the various polls on this site, but I always feel like I want to go back and change my answers almost immediately. I always feel like I kind of missed the point somehow, that I haven’t even come close to communicating how I feel about the song or how it’s touched me. I mean, if I gave ‘Now My Heart is Full’ 10/10 and ‘Black Cloud’ 7/10, what does that three integer difference actually mean? I haven’t the foggiest.
I mean, what does 6/10 mean in relation to The Lazy Sunbathers? Does it mean it’s not quite ‘meh’? Mathematically, 6/10 implies it’s a little above average, that it’s hardly worth the effort of listening to and certainly not worth the time and expense spent recording it.
Please don’t see this as an attack on your position. I know how much you like your data. But I really don’t get it. Well, I get it, I understand what these numbers are intended to convey... but I just don’t get it.
I think it’s me.