TTY: "This is why Trump is everybody's enemy"

An anonymous person sends the link:

"This is why Trump is everybody's enemy" - true-to-you.net
5 February 2017

"This is why Trump is everybody's enemy"

says Morrissey.

http://bfp.org/new-trump-rule-means-animal-labs-hidden/

 

[Anonymous]

 

[Anonymous]

It's funny that the Police "Demolition Man" is the soundtrack but I don't understand what's happening in that video.

The video is a mini compilation from Rinkeby ghetto in Stockholm suburb showing what the police are subjected to whenever they visit that no go-zone.

 

[Quando quando quando]

The way you make yourself come across as stupid might have been cute 10 years ago but not these days and you know full well the problems you have in your own country where people have been killed in the streets for their political beliefs. I would have hoped an old man like you would have known better but I also know a thing or two about your past so maybe you identify with the criminals?

Silly old man you will never get laid here and where you live you can get laid at every street corner so take a walk.

You don't no anything about me.
I might be younger then you.
The thing or two you claim to know about my country hasn't any value at all, just as I know the thing or two about yours.

The difference is, I don't claim to know a thing or two about your country. What I said about Sweden could be applied to many more countries in Europe and the way you took it is insulting and hateful.
You are an ageist too.

I know very well about the two people that were slaughtered here for their political beliefs.
I live here.
Until now the only "solution" I hear from you is racist hatred and a plea for the "endlosing" of people you don't like or want for so many reasons. Hitler was right, eh?
Kill "them" all. Doesn't matter if they are Jews, Muslims, gays, old people, sick people, snowflakes, lesbians, whatever distinction you make.

Well let me tell you one thing.
I am not going to let me escorted by you to the slaughterhouse and go with you like a sheep.
And if you do come with your fascist army of cowards I will fight.

And anyone who is in danger because of you and your Nazi army, I will try to protect.
I will fight to the last breath.
There are things more important then my own life.
So f*** you.

 

[Anonymous]

You don't no anything about me.
I might be younger then you.
The thing or two you claim to know about my country hasn't any value at all, just as I know the thing or two about yours.

The difference is, I don't claim to know a thing or two about your country. What I said about Sweden could be applied to many more countries in Europe and the way you took it is insulting and hateful.
You are an ageist too.

I know very well about the two people that were slaughtered here for their political beliefs.
I live here.
Until now the only "solution" I hear from you is racist hatred and a plea for the "endlosing" of people you don't like or want for so many reasons. Hitler was right, eh?
Kill "them" all. Doesn't matter if they are Jews, Muslims, gays, old people, sick people, snowflakes, lesbians, whatever distinction you make.

Well let me tell you one thing.
I am not going to let me escorted by you to the slaughterhouse and go with you like a sheep.
And if you do come with your fascist army of cowards I will fight.

And anyone who is in danger because of you and your Nazi army, I will try to protect.
I will fight to the last breath.
There are things more important then my own life.
So f*** you.

Blood pressure!

Like I have said before I am a realist and nothing else but I like people like you slapping these tags on me out of your own fear so keep that coming.

 

[Anonymous]

Irony: When you engage in a practice while accusing others of that practice

 

[Quando quando quando]

Blood pressure!

Like I have said before I am a realist and nothing else but I like people like you slapping these tags on me out of your own fear so keep that coming.

You are the one who is tagging.
Being a realist as you say means nothing. Or are you implying that being a realist means to use violence against all categories of people you despise for whatever obscure reason?
You just could say you are objective.
Means nothing too.

As I am a very old man, I have nothing much too lose so I am not afraid. I feel good though and strong enough to fight.
I keep myself in shape and I have all the other means necessary to protect myself and innocent other people as much as possible.
You won't believe me but that would even include you.
Reluctantly, but still.

 

[nicky wire's legs]

i wouldnt waste my time, gerrit. he's a total joke.

 

[Quando quando quando]

i wouldnt waste my time, gerrit. he's a total joke.

I know, but I am willing to change arguments with him and taking him serious cause if we all just ignore him and never reply it could be a major pain in the ass of all people.
Everybody would say, why did we let him get on on this site which is supposed to be about Moz.
Cheers Rifke, thanks!

 

[Layne]

Here is some evidence with regard to the Melania hate from left-wing extremists that ought to be disavowed (but won't be):

And, just to keep things in perspective, this is why Shady Con is everyone's enemy:

 

[pearls well clutched]

But one hateful person on twitter isn't really representative of the left or left wing extremists, even. If you want that statement disavowed I hereby do so on behalf of myself. I can't speak for "the left" but as a leftist myself I'm certain many people would disagree with this statement if they bothered to have an opinion at all.
Do you disavow twitter posts that are racist towards Obama? How much time should we spend looking for hateful posts from the right and left and pretending that they are significant statistically?

 

[Quando quando quando]

Here is some evidence with regard to the Melania hate from left-wing extremists that ought to be disavowed (but won't be):

And, just to keep things in perspective, this is why Shady Con is everyone's enemy:

Apparently so.
Why can't I get used to it?
How do you anticipate?

 

[Anonymous]

Apparently so.
Why can't I get used to it?
How do you anticipate?

The same way you deal with any violent crazy random or unpredictable crime or threat. In my city robberies and murders from residents will far out number any terrorism activity related crimes if there is any at all but we still go out and about our day. It's just about how you deal with it and how it will gradually affect your expectations. That's not to say you should accept any of the above, the deadlier homegrown crime or terrorist attacks, as unchangeable or unavoidable but as example after example shows you do get used to things. Life in a free society comes with risks. In theory we could eliminate murder of drug trade if we got rid of a lot of civil liberties we enjoy but we haven't yet because most don't want to live that way and those liberties allow use to enjoy and experience our lives (which is the point of life). It's a balance that modern society is still working on and it evolves

 

[Quando quando quando]

The same way you deal with any violent crazy random or unpredictable crime or threat. In my city robberies and murders from residents will far out number any terrorism activity related crimes if there is any at all but we still go out and about our day. It's just about how you deal with it and how it will gradually affect your expectations. That's not to say you should accept any of the above, the deadlier homegrown crime or terrorist attacks, as unchangeable or unavoidable but as example after example shows you do get used to things. Life in a free society comes with risks. In theory we could eliminate murder of drug trade if we got rid of a lot of civil liberties we enjoy but we haven't yet because most don't want to live that way and those liberties allow use to enjoy and experience our lives (which is the point of life). It's a balance that modern society is still working on and it evolves

Okay got it.
Rationally, all good points you make.
Where I live there is not much of the crimes you described and I think I can minimize the risk by avoiding the places where they occur. You might as well say the risk of getting an accident on the highway is higher, which it is.

But to get used to the idea of just walking on a bridge and being attacked by someone having a grudge, not against me personally but because I am accidently there isn't easy.
Not only the idea of what is in that somebody's mind, cause anger can turn people into murderers.

But the fact it is a planned method, promoted by an ideology that is terrorist, evil and incomprehensible.
Whether you are Christian, Jew, nonbeliever, Shia, Sunni, Hindhi, Bhudist makes no difference. Children? It doesn't matter.
Preferably you have to be innocent.
I just don't want to understand anymore.
It's got to stop.

 

[bhops]

Okay got it.
Rationally, all good points you make.
Where I live there is not much of the crimes you described and I think I can minimize the risk by avoiding the places where they occur. You might as well say the risk of getting an accident on the highway is higher, which it is.

But to get used to the idea of just walking on a bridge and being attacked by someone having a grudge, not against me personally but because I am accidently there isn't easy.
Not only the idea of what is in that somebody's mind, cause anger can turn people into murderers.

But the fact it is a planned method, promoted by an ideology that is terrorist, evil and incomprehensible.
Whether you are Christian, Jew, nonbeliever, Shia, Sunni, Hindhi, Bhudist makes no difference. Children? It doesn't matter.
Preferably you have to be innocent.
I just don't want to understand anymore.
It's got to stop.

I couldn't agree more. The very idea that we somehow 'normalise' terror attacks as the price for living in a western democracy is patently ridiculous and should be rejected at every juncture. The notion that we should simply add it to the list of negatives that come with big city living is abhorrent to me as I'm sure it is abhorrent to most sane-thinking people and is the 1st step towards the terrorists winning. How anyone could casually dismiss it as 'one of those things' is actually mind blowing to me.

And Sadiq Khan, what a piece of shit that guy is. he has associated with some very dodgy people over the years and never really come out and condemned them either. Another apologist who is telling us that we simply have to get used to it. It is that sort of Neville Chamberlain apologist 'she'll be right mate' stance that will the ruination of London.

 

[Anonymous]

Sebastian Gorka backtracks on anti-Semitic group link: “I never swore allegiance formally”
The Trump staffer backtracked on his claim last week that he never took "an oath of loyalty" to a far-right group

Somehow this seems more relevant than some rando on twitter. An aide to the United States President is a Nazi. "should be disavowed but won't be"?

 

[Anonymous]

Okay got it.
Rationally, all good points you make.
Where I live there is not much of the crimes you described and I think I can minimize the risk by avoiding the places where they occur. You might as well say the risk of getting an accident on the highway is higher, which it is.

But to get used to the idea of just walking on a bridge and being attacked by someone having a grudge, not against me personally but because I am accidently there isn't easy.
Not only the idea of what is in that somebody's mind, cause anger can turn people into murderers.

But the fact it is a planned method, promoted by an ideology that is terrorist, evil and incomprehensible.
Whether you are Christian, Jew, nonbeliever, Shia, Sunni, Hindhi, Bhudist makes no difference. Children? It doesn't matter.
Preferably you have to be innocent.
I just don't want to understand anymore.
It's got to stop.

The probability of being hit by a drunk driver who is indifferent to the lives they take is a similar feeling. Like that guy who drove into a Mardi Gras parade not long ago who was two and a half times the legal limit. When living in a large city there always risk of violence or chaos. If the idea of the violence motivated By your religion or skin color then your not alone as I think of those Indian men shit by a man in Kansas who of course decided they were Muslim and told hey to get out of his country or the guy who the guy who tried to burn down another Indian mans business also assuming they were Muslim or even the Baltimore man who stabbed a black homeless senior citizen to death after seeing him digging through a public trash can just recently. You could get bombed just for working at planned parenthood or shot by men talking about baby parts which was another incident not long ago. None of it's acceptable but it hard to avoid or predict in these cases as for example the Kansas man didn't have a prior record and the authorities had no reason to lock him up or to think his anger would suddenly explode into violent action. What could that do to preempt it without say taking his guns away which our societies decided is a civil liberty they want despite risks. In the arson case I'm not sure there was anything they could do accept extreme monitoring, which could run into free speech and privacy violations, and if his actions were spontaneous hatred then even that wouldn't work. Guess what I'm saying is that terroist actions, as viewed as acts of violence motivated by hatred of religion or race or nationality, are not new and still we go on like we always have

 

[Quando quando quando]

The probability of being hit by a drunk driver who is indifferent to the lives they take is a similar feeling. Like that guy who drove into a Mardi Gras parade not long ago who was two and a half times the legal limit. When living in a large city there always risk of violence or chaos. If the idea of the violence motivated By your religion or skin color then your not alone as I think of those Indian men shit by a man in Kansas who of course decided they were Muslim and told hey to get out of his country or the guy who the guy who tried to burn down another Indian mans business also assuming they were Muslim or even the Baltimore man who stabbed a black homeless senior citizen to death after seeing him digging through a public trash can just recently. You could get bombed just for working at planned parenthood or shot by men talking about baby parts which was another incident not long ago. None of it's acceptable but it hard to avoid or predict in these cases as for example the Kansas man didn't have a prior record and the authorities had no reason to lock him up or to think his anger would suddenly explode into violent action. What could that do to preempt it without say taking his guns away which our societies decided is a civil liberty they want despite risks. In the arson case I'm not sure there was anything they could do accept extreme monitoring, which could run into free speech and privacy violations, and if his actions were spontaneous hatred then even that wouldn't work. Guess what I'm saying is that terroist actions, as viewed as acts of violence motivated by hatred of religion or race or nationality, are not new and still we go on like we always have

Maybe it has to do with living in a country that was from the end of WW2 until 2002, a relative peaceful society.
It seems life in the US is so much more tough, hard, and people are used to more violence and have access to guns and weapons so much more easily. And people getting hardened in mentality and attitude. I'm not criticising that. Maybe I would feel the same, living there.

 

[Anonymous]

Maybe it has to do with living in a country that was from the end of WW2 until 2002, a relative peaceful society.
It seems life in the US is so much more tough, hard, and people are used to more violence and have access to guns and weapons so much more easily. And people getting hardened in mentality and attitude. I'm not criticising that. Maybe I would feel the same, living there.

This is probably true. It's somewhat about perception and expectations as well as the sense of self. like I said above minorities here have faced terroistic attacks some organized and some not for a long time now but in the Islamic terrorist attacks it's a racial majority that's for a long time felt somewhat insulated from violence and enjoyed a sense of protection from being attacked and singled out who are now calling for sometimes extreme measures and targeted rollbacks of civil liberties to protect them from attacks that have resulted in less casualties than general crime which can often be deadlier but generally harm citizens who aren't considered to matter as much. There's an irrationality to the whole deal that's bad for everyone. It plays into the islamic terrorists hands as these targeted rollbacks to civil liberties often broadly target minorities making them feel persecuted perhaps inspiring another Domestically born racial minority to lash out and suddenly attacks and well as Inspiring racism in general that can result in the same. It can also have the effect of making a scrutinized minority less likely to approach police from fear and a lot of tips come from these groups. My general point being that The expectations we have, from living in a more peaceful country or just being from a more protected class, shouldn't have us react irrationally and not for example put a travel ban on countries that have not produced a number of deadly terroists in our country but have us not focus our federal resources on nationisly racial supremacy groups even as they inspire deadly church shootings. Dylan roof killed more u.s citizens in one act of terror than anyone from any country on our travel ban. We should continue with our lives while finding fact evidence based ways of dealing with all of these problems and not let terrorists achieve there goal of spreading fear

 

[Layne]

But one hateful person on twitter isn't really representative of the left or left wing extremists, even. If you want that statement disavowed I hereby do so on behalf of myself. I can't speak for "the left" but as a leftist myself I'm certain many people would disagree with this statement if they bothered to have an opinion at all.
Do you disavow twitter posts that are racist towards Obama? How much time should we spend looking for hateful posts from the right and left and pretending that they are significant statistically?

You just proved my point. Thank you. Somehow, however, SJWs and the mainstream media will fail to understand what you just articulated and will continue to cite right-wing extremists as the norm and left-wing extremists as the exception.

 

[Layne]

Sebastian Gorka backtracks on anti-Semitic group link: “I never swore allegiance formally”
The Trump staffer backtracked on his claim last week that he never took "an oath of loyalty" to a far-right group

Somehow this seems more relevant than some rando on twitter. An aide to the United States President is a Nazi. "should be disavowed but won't be"?

Thank you. Another case of a conservative being asked to "disavow" alleged connections to particular extremist groups while progressives are left unchecked.

Sadiq Khan ought to disavow his connections to Islamic extremists, but of course no one would dare ask him to. In fact, it is perfectly all right for him to instruct us that acts of terror ought to just be accepted. Imagine if a major politician came out and said that acts of terror committed by neo-Nazi groups (I'm half laughing here) ought to just be accepted as part of life in a multi-cultural society? Who thinks that would fly?