TTY: Monarchy is Anarchy

I haven't watched the first video, but the second video is a run-of-the-mill anti-globalist "exposé" video linking the royal family to the satanic Illuminati secret society. It cites esotericism and the occult, Morrissey's apparent new area of interest, as reference points quite a bit. It doesn't quite reach David Icke territory (so far---I'm not through the entire thing yet) but it's still preposterous overreaching founded on paranoia and superstition.

Has Morrissey gone full-blown NWO/ZOG conspiracy theorist? When is his interview with Infowars? Yikes...


EDIT: Yep, now Jews and Zionism have been introduced and directly connected to the global conspiracy the Royals are apparently a party to. Had a feeling this was coming with a title like "Zion King." Jesus Christ.
 
Last edited:
A

Anonymous

Guest
But he polices public perceptions rigidly to try and do exactly that, hence his 'humasexual' denial of being gay. When public perception affronts his own self-image he's lightning quick to react. But there's probably no point him clarifying if he posted these videos as I'd guess the British Public long ago concluded he was a conspiracy loon. The Zionist Plot stuff is particularly troubing given his bizarre 'conspiracy theory' about Jews in the Hollywood music business in his Autobiography.

If someone at TTY suddenly posted gay porn or racial eugenics videos from the Nazis, one assumes he'd be quick to dissociate himself. Posting inflammatory material without a disclaimer can only be assumed to be a tacit endorsement. If he's comfortable being linked to this 'Zionist Royal Banker Plot' video then he'll keep schtum. If not, he'll pipe up and banish Julia to Siberia. Suggesting he's not made aware of each and every addition to TTY is fanciful in the extreme given his neurotic patrolling of his public image. I assume the covert take-away he intends is that there is some 'plot' to stop him making another album and it's to do with British Royals and Zionist Banking families....to which the only appropriate response would be...LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOLLLLLLLLLLLL! He'll be selling tin-foil hats at his merchandising stall next.

best
The Ghost of BrummieBoy
Werent you calling him straight in the kiss me alot video comments? Changed your story?
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
But he polices public perceptions rigidly to try and do exactly that, hence his 'humasexual' denial of being gay. When public perception affronts his own self-image he's lightning quick to react. But there's probably no point him clarifying if he posted these videos as I'd guess the British Public long ago concluded he was a conspiracy loon. The Zionist Plot stuff is particularly troubing given his bizarre 'conspiracy theory' about Jews in the Hollywood music business in his Autobiography.

If someone at TTY suddenly posted gay porn or racial eugenics videos from the Nazis, one assumes he'd be quick to dissociate himself. Posting inflammatory material without a disclaimer can only be assumed to be a tacit endorsement. If he's comfortable being linked to this 'Zionist Royal Banker Plot' video then he'll keep schtum. If not, he'll pipe up and banish Julia to Siberia. Suggesting he's not made aware of each and every addition to TTY is fanciful in the extreme given his neurotic patrolling of his public image. I assume the covert take-away he intends is that there is some 'plot' to stop him making another album and it's to do with British Royals and Zionist Banking families....to which the only appropriate response would be...LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOLLLLLLLLLLLL! He'll be selling tin-foil hats at his merchandising stall next.

best
The Ghost of BrummieBoy

have you seen julia in those videos. the odds of her even thinking of posting something not directly give her by moz are 0.0.
why would anyone be surprised at these anti semitic videos? moz has a history of racist comments.

all you have to do is watch one of the youtube videos of moz sashaying around onstage to know which way the wind blows with the moz. nobody really buys into the huma stuff, not even his cult.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
that video was sam failed attempt to prop up moz huma image. it really didnt do the trick.

In his defence if moz were to have sex with a woman on stage people would be shaking their head say "oh such gay denial"
Morrissey is what he is, whether we want to belive it or not. We dont live in his head. If he says he is huma then he is huma. There is evidence to support his statment. He just leans a bit more to men which people has taken as "he is 100% gay" all the best of luck to him.
 

Uncleskinny

It's all good
Subscriber
Why should s/he provide evidence for his/her claims when you don't?

Jesus. All you're doing is being rude and obnoxious. Strange behaviour for a moderator.

Listen, dipshit. Clearly you are a bear of very little brain so let me explain to you how this works.

Someone makes an assertion, in this case that Moz may not have posted everything on TTY. I ask for evidence of this. The burden of proof is on the one making the assertion, not the one asking for proof. Proof came there none. You get that, right?

As for for being rude and obnoxious, it's all in the eye of the beholder. If you don't like that, you can f*** off :thumb: And when you find that moderator code of conduct, let me have a look will you? I've never seen it.

Finally - why would it kill you to know that Moz has posted some batshit crazy nut-job stuff? Is your image so precious, your investment so long, that it would personally crucify you? The answer is yes.

There's none so blind as them that don't see.
 
Last edited:
A

Anonymous

Guest
He's generously directing you to free education. Have you seen these videos on the TV? I haven't. Surface, you should be thanking Morrissey for helping to enlighten you. These videos are for your edification, obviously.

#GoVeganAndStopTheAbuse

Not sure what his point is? What is he looking to achieve?
 

evennow

Writers on the storm
In his defence if moz were to have sex with a woman on stage people would be shaking their head say "oh such gay denial"
Morrissey is what he is, whether we want to belive it or not. We dont live in his head. If he says he is huma then he is huma. There is evidence to support his statment. He just leans a bit more to men which people has taken as "he is 100% gay" all the best of luck to him.

Any port in a skin storm most likely ;)
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
In his defence if moz were to have sex with a woman on stage people would be shaking their head say "oh such gay denial"
Morrissey is what he is, whether we want to belive it or not. We dont live in his head. If he says he is huma then he is huma. There is evidence to support his statment. He just leans a bit more to men which people has taken as "he is 100% gay" all the best of luck to him.

you must mean a dude dressed as a woman. LOL
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
i dont think moz would be someone who can educate. he has no education.
 

Gregor Samsa

I straighten up, and my position is one of hope.
Listen, dipshit. Clearly you are a bear of very little brain so let me explain to you how this works.

Someone makes an assertion, in this case that Moz may not have posted everything on TTY. I ask for evidence of this. The burden of proof is on the one making the assertion, not the one asking for proof. Proof came there none. You get that, right?

As for for being rude and obnoxious, it's all in the eye of the beholder. If you don't like that, you can f*** off :thumb: And when you find that moderator code of conduct, let me have a look will you? I've never seen it.

Finally - why would it kill you to know that Moz has posted some batshit crazy nut-job stuff? Is your image so precious, your investment so long, that it would personally crucify you? The answer is yes.

There's none so blind as them that don't see.
Why the hell are you insulting me? I don't get why you're always so rude. And no, there is no moderator code of conduct. It's just common sense to be at least nice-ish, and don't resort to ad hominems and plain insults. You're representing this site, right? So what does it say about this site when the moderators behave like trolls and insult its users? I don't think I'm being completely absurd for asking this.

It's highly likely that Moz posted the videos. I don't give a shit. I haven't watched them. They don't interest me one bit. Not my sort of thing.

Aren't you claiming, directly or indirectly, that he do post everything on TTY himself? What's the difference? If you don't, fine, my bad. Then you're just being the in-house judge and jury, and I assume you will be demanding evidence from all users, even those who are against Moz. No matter what the claims are.
 

Uncleskinny

It's all good
Subscriber
Why the hell are you insulting me? I don't get why you're always so rude. And no, there is no moderator code of conduct. It's just common sense to be at least nice-ish, and don't resort to ad hominems and plain insults. You're representing this site, right? So what does it say about this site when the moderators behave like trolls and insult its users? I don't think I'm being completely absurd for asking this.

It's highly likely that Moz posted the videos. I don't give a shit. I haven't watched them. They don't interest me one bit. Not my sort of thing.

Aren't you claiming, directly or indirectly, that he do post everything on TTY himself? What's the difference? If you don't, fine, my bad. Then you're just being the in-house judge and jury, and I assume you will be demanding evidence from all users, even those who are against Moz. No matter what the claims are.

So, in summary, no evidence, and welcome to the f***ing internet.:thumb:

Oh, and I'm not representing the site. Never have. I represent me.
 
Last edited:
A

Anonymous

Guest
Why the hell are you insulting me? I don't get why you're always so rude. And no, there is no moderator code of conduct. It's just common sense to be at least nice-ish, and don't resort to ad hominems and plain insults. You're representing this site, right? So what does it say about this site when the moderators behave like trolls and insult its users? I don't think I'm being completely absurd for asking this.

It's highly likely that Moz posted the videos. I don't give a shit. I haven't watched them. They don't interest me one bit. Not my sort of thing.

Aren't you claiming, directly or indirectly, that he do post everything on TTY himself? What's the difference? If you don't, fine, my bad. Then you're just being the in-house judge and jury, and I assume you will be demanding evidence from all users, even those who are against Moz. No matter what the claims are.

whats wrong with you? every post is the same thing. anti semitic material doesnt bother you but this nonsense about moderating does?
 

No1uno

Member of the Month™
Subscriber
I don't know where it went but I was original responding to a question like "so we all hate like a Benny" hence my response

From where I am, at the middle, your question states some truth for me. Both sides sound like the same static though. I will say that the displeased often state very salient points that are hard to ignore.

Someone posts critical of morrissey
Someone posts critical of the criticizer but doesn't counter the criticism of morrissey.

A downward spiral ensues. The original criticizer loses nothing (they spoke their peace), the criticizer of the critical gets mad and resorts to the same hate they dispised from the critical person.

I often wonder why the ones who are most offended by posts don't just state what they do like in regards to countering the original criticism, and just stand on that. I think if the poster expected to change or smackdown the criticizor then I feel they often fail at that. So I wonder why they try when they shed a worse light on themselves that they wanted to show the original criticizer in.
 
Last edited:

Ketamine Sun

<><><><><><><><><><>
But he polices public perceptions rigidly to try and do exactly that, hence his 'humasexual' denial of being gay. When public perception affronts his own self-image he's lightning quick to react. But there's probably no point him clarifying if he posted these videos as I'd guess the British Public long ago concluded he was a conspiracy loon. The Zionist Plot stuff is particularly troubing given his bizarre 'conspiracy theory' about Jews in the Hollywood music business in his Autobiography.

If someone at TTY suddenly posted gay porn or racial eugenics videos from the Nazis, one assumes he'd be quick to dissociate himself. Posting inflammatory material without a disclaimer can only be assumed to be a tacit endorsement. If he's comfortable being linked to this 'Zionist Royal Banker Plot' video then he'll keep schtum. If not, he'll pipe up and banish Julia to Siberia. Suggesting he's not made aware of each and every addition to TTY is fanciful in the extreme given his neurotic patrolling of his public image. I assume the covert take-away he intends is that there is some 'plot' to stop him making another album and it's to do with British Royals and Zionist Banking families....to which the only appropriate response would be...LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOLLLLLLLLLLLL! He'll be selling tin-foil hats at his merchandising stall next.

best
The Ghost of BrummieBoy


yeah, After all your yapping, The first in line for a 'tin-foil hat' will be.... YOU.


now.... LOL !:lbf::lbf::lbf:
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
SOO glad USA isn't part of monarchy. At least our billionaires did and do something to to earn their money.

And here, specifically, is the perfected consequence of Conservatism as anti-Establishment rhetoric.

Turn the music down and read a f***ing book.
 

Surface

Vegan Cro’s parents regret the condom splitting
He's generously directing you to free education. Have you seen these videos on the TV? I haven't. Surface, you should be thanking Morrissey for helping to enlighten you. These videos are for your edification, obviously.

#GoVeganAndStopTheAbuse

I have not seen them before either, however I do not care. My kids (teenagers) love the modern monarchy. On another note, something that did interest me was the front page of todays MEN, which I bought immediately. Why? because it featured some photos of the Smiths from around the time I saw them play live 2 or 3 times. Guess what, at this point in his career he didn't spout all the shite that he does today and didn't have hangers on who hold onto every word and try to decipher his hidden messages.

He was simply a great song writer - thats why I can diss him for the shit he spouts but will still go and watch him perform whenever I want as I have the ability to keep the two parts of his persona apart.
 
Last edited:

Trending Threads

Top Bottom