Your choice of examples demonstrates you like to cherry pick data to fit your agenda. Of all the thousands of items posted you choose these two. Also, Uncleskinny had nothing to do with the story about the site that suggested the links to paedophilia.
What about your agenda? You do the same thing, David and I would argue in a worse way. I really don't understand why you have such a hard time with mea culpa. You always seem to deflect ANY data that doesn't favor you, YOUR agenda and this website, which INCLUDES support from P. Can you explain this? I have yet to see you EVER admit ANY wrongdoing! I suppose that you must be perfect.
You would do well to ask advice from someone in Public Relations, unless of course, this IS your P.R. stunt to operate in this substandard-even-for-TMZ-type way. Maybe "Thewlis" did choose to highlight these two items, but they are very abhorrent items that demand attention and are a blatant disregard for journalistic integrity and ethics.
I get it, you're not a journalist or a newspaper, you're like youtube or whatever, but do you have ANY code of ethics at all? If I give money to this website, if I'm a sponsor, can I post things about Morrissey that are patently untrue? Can I carry out the grudges of ex-band members and MorrisseyHaters, which we know support you and your efforts(...but I won't name names.)? The so unbelievably desperate for attention UnclePleaseSeeMe as is evident in him posting rare material on HIS SoundCloud account with a pic of him presumably "singing" and probably forever ruining people's ears, supports your efforts if even publicly condemning certain stories or aspects of the website has EVERYTHING TO DO with the pedophilia and drunkard stories AND other negative items that have since been deleted. But because of the laws in England regarding such claims, he can't publicly support you without being held legally liable. And we know, P. is very afraid of being sued as he should be.
David, I know it will never happen, but I would very much like to interview you for your website. I just think many do not understand where you are coming from. IF you respond to this (you won't), I'm sure it'll be an ad-hominem attack or wild guesses of who you think I am and what I've allegedly done on this website or your false accusations that I'm a troll or threats of being banned or this or that, again, rather than directly addressing the issues that I bring up. Will you ever answers No1uno's question about whether or not you attended the recent L.A. gig, even though we know that you are banned? Do you respect Morrissey's wishes that you remain banned? I mean that would be "interesting" information or "news" as you call it, if you did attend the gig even though you are banned, wouldn't it? Will you ever address any questions that you don't feel benefits you? It's very interesting that you accuse someone else cherry picking information as that is exactly what you purport to do here on this very website and have for years, but you call it, "Things I find interesting." Do you always deflect when questions are posed to you?
And UncleSkinny, I would LOVE for your lawyer to contact me, I'll have your ass in a sling so fast you won't know what hit you.
