You would serve yourself better by just being vague.. The actual truth as I've experienced it is that you do everything on a case by case basis depending on how you feel at the time, which is totally your right, and I don't know why you don't just say that. I'd have suggested you just left that at "possibly." That's true. It's got lots of wiggle room. It doesn't pretend to be logical and no one could argue with it.Possibly, but if the users rates a lot of users then no rule is actually broken. I'm revisiting the rating system with the new site upgrade planning.
Play in traffic.I would say scanty is a good example of someone who harasses someone with the negative ratings, as in the case of her constantly rating thepoliticalrevolution's posts as redundant or troll (even more than she does mine), despite the fact that I've never seen thepoliticalrevolution say anything at all to scanty, nor does scanty ever really contribute anything to the board (aside from a few negative comments--like telling poli to play in traffic--here and there), nor has TPR ever shown herself deserving of such harassment (as she's never been nasty to anyone). just because you don't like someone or you're jealous because they're better at your schtick than you are and more in the know about fashion doesn't mean that person is a troll or that they're being redundant.