Tirade against the NME on Morrissey Official FB by Peter Katsis

Appears to come from Peter Katsis. Appallingly written mess of a statement.

Link here:

Text here:

"The N.M.E. used to represent the underground.

Now they are becoming known as The Guardian of rock music.

They had to stop printing copies.

Not because no one buys magazines.

Print publications like Q Magazine and Kerrang! still exist, because they remember who they are.

But not N.M.E.

They forgot who they were.

And because they just aren’t cool anymore.

N.M.E. are also just full of shit.

And can’t even afford good writers to work for them.

They like to remind readers of all the past allegations of the year, despite their lack of any basis in fact, despite that they are just re-hashing stories over and over, old news, fake news, etc.

But they leave out their own old issues, of lawsuits lost, and legal battles that forced them to apologize to M in the past.

And they lie more than Donald Trump.

-N.M.E. asked no one from M’s camp for comment to their recent story.

-Haslam was never a Moz fan. He was a publicity hound who had a new book coming that no one cared about.

-We didn’t cancel our summer shows because of Haslam’s weak event, the protest that drew no people.

-Moz in not a racist.

None of M’s latino fans care about UK politics, but hell…..why not call them up and try and find a story where one doesn’t exist?

Not like they have anything real to write about……like music.

Because they don’t even know what music is anymore.

Basically all this points to the fact that writer(?) Bob Chiarito and his editors at N.M.E. have been relegated to meaninglessness.

Not really even worth writing about for this Facebook post.

We stand up for ourselves here, not because we give a shit anymore what these folks say…..

…..but to point out to the fans and music industry of the UK that they’ve changed their title.

Now N.M.E. stands for …….Now Mostly Excrement.

No longer of any value to the music community…. they have decided to be the TMZ of music news.

Good riddance. - PK"


Related item:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
V

vegan.cro spirit# 453

Guest
Lets have Amazon double the pay of the workers
and have them pay 30 percent tax on top of that
you can probably buy a cup of coffee with the tax
proceeds seeing that nobody will be buying the 80
quid amazon cds.
ps probably have but one worker, someone to close to
shut the door right after they go broke.:crazy:

We seem to have a set of JMKs here.:lbf:
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
:rolleyes:
Getting a might feverish on there.
Whats with all the WWF talk? Wrassling with the boyfriend?:crazy:
Wrassling with the fact that your father wasn’t around to smack the shit out of your sorry ass, when you - so desperately - needed it, ya lippy ass little f***-yard.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
I say this as someone who doesn't necessarily have an alignment to any left wing faction/sect, but do ultimately want to see the state in its current form destroyed and replaced with something for the benefit of all ordinary working people, regardless of race, creed, nationality etc:

Putin is without a doubt a right-wing proto-fascist. Seeing left wingers defend him out some nostalgia for the USSR is disgusting. He has established a mafia state run by billionaire oligarchs, which regularly murders dissidents and the opposition, often on foreign soil.

The Cuban government, North Korean regime and Venezuela are all f***ing tankies and Stalinist fan boys. Although a lot of misinformation is spread about them, and analysis of them should be more nuanced (not so much North Korea), they certainly aren't the type of socialism I'd consider desirable.

This is the great thing about socialism. It's massive spectrum, with lots of different branches and variations, thinkers.

'Smashing the state', LOL! Could you be any more of a cliché? Smash it all you like, but what will you do when you're placed in prison and non-whites start being deported and there's no state to protect you or them? There will be armed militias out in the streets shooting at each other. Try to disarm Bubba and he with his camouflage wearing buddies will hunt you down like The Most Dangerous Game. That's 'Sir Bubba' to you, by the way. He's made for that kind of stateless scenario, you're not. The fate of you and your comrades would be nasty, brutish, and short.

And guess what: after they begin deporting non-whites and the white population begins to show a healthy increase again, do you know what they'll do then? Re-establish the state. LMAO! And all your hard work will have been for nought.

But how little you realize, that the state being destroyed and replaced with something else is even less likely in our new multi-racial countries than it was in our relatively homogeneous countries of old. So don't worry, your dream/nightmare scenario will never come to fruition, and that's no one's fault but your own along with everyone else who encouraged mass immigration into our countries. So you'll have to get used to capitalism, big business, regulations, non-nationalized institutions, ethnic tensions, corruption, that's the future that you and your ilk set out for us.

The fact that you're allowed to "teach" anyone is a frightening thought, but it's not really "teaching" is it, you're just inculcating them with the same lies you were inculcated with. You really have no idea what the future has in store, do you? I always knew the left were short-sighted but this is just yet another stark reminder of it. Living in a total fantasy world, as I indicated earlier, your shallow view of history has left you with zero insight into the world we're living in. You're due a wake up call.
 
V

vegan.cro spirit# 453

Guest
Wrassling with the fact that your father wasn’t around to smack the shit out of your sorry ass, when you - so desperately - needed it, ya lippy ass little f***-yard.

:grimacing:
NO, wrassling with your boyfriend while wearing pajamas.:dancers:
 
V

vegan.cro spirit# 453

Guest
'Smashing the state', LOL! Could you be any more of a cliché? Smash it all you like, but what will you do when you're placed in prison and non-whites start being deported and there's no state to protect you or them? There will be armed militias out in the streets shooting at each other. Try to disarm Bubba and he with his camouflage wearing buddies will hunt you down like The Most Dangerous Game. That's 'Sir Bubba' to you, by the way. He's made for that kind of stateless scenario, you're not. The fate of you and your comrades would be nasty, brutish, and short.

And guess what: after they begin deporting non-whites and the white population begins to show a healthy increase again, do you know what they'll do then? Re-establish the state. LMAO! And all your hard work will have been for nought.

But how little you realize, that the state being destroyed and replaced with something else is even less likely in our new multi-racial countries than it was in our relatively homogeneous countries of old. So don't worry, your dream/nightmare scenario will never come to fruition, and that's no one's fault but your own along with everyone else who encouraged mass immigration into our countries. So you'll have to get used to capitalism, big business, regulations, non-nationalized institutions, ethnic tensions, corruption, that's the future that you and your ilk set out for us.

The fact that you're allowed to "teach" anyone is a frightening thought, but it's not really "teaching" is it, you're just inculcating them with the same lies you were inculcated with. You really have no idea what the future has in store, do you? I always knew the left were short-sighted but this is just yet another stark reminder of it. Living in a total fantasy world, as I indicated earlier, your shallow view of history has left you with zero insight into the world we're living in. You're due a wake up call.

Hes the type of teacher that would tell you math was racist.:laughing:
If I walked into the classroom and saw Stalin with the shifty:eyes: and half a dozen
enormous tattoos I would ask to be excused and call 911.:blacktelephone:
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Do you believe in the minimum/living wage? Do you believe in a national health service? Do you believe that capitalists will distribute money, but politicians are hindering them? Would Apple, Google, Amazon and Starbucks pay taxes if it wasn't for those damned politicians?

Touché. Not to mention the fact that these illiterate, web-raised, f***-wit knobs around here are tossing around terms like “socialism” as a means of insult.

They’ve all been out on Halloween, dressed as whatever, knocking on doors for free candy. THAT’S pure, unadulterated socialism. ...and they’re too daft to know, too lazy to read and too devoid of proper genetics to have the wherewithal to grasp how f***ing lost they are.
 

Cornflakes

"A bit iffy" ★★☆☆☆ - AV Club
:rolleyes:
Thats pretty incoherent, according to your theory Hitler-who according to the LOONS was extreme right wing would be extremely pro liberty.:lbf:
No, you vapid f***ing Nazi troll. To be right wing you need an ideological basis to support social inequality. For some, it is obsessive and artificial support for a vague concept of liberty. For Hitler it was ethnic nationalism and an obsessive belief in social order.

BTW, you might want to set today as an anniversary on your phone, because I am not going to be replying to one of your posts very often.
 

countthree

Well-Known Member
This doesn't seem logically coherent, the context of what you have said previously. On the one hand, it's perfectly reasonable to point out that we live in a complex world and individual cases will call for individual responses. But what makes you right wing is not that you will "adopt every single time one or another position" (although, think about it for a second, because you inevitably will, unless you decide in a particular case that you don't care). It's that you have declared a bias for the concept of liberty. Given that there's an undeniable connection between liberty and wealth, your bias will, unavoidably, tend to favour the interests of the wealthy. This is what makes you right wing.

It also generally tends to be the case, in my experience, that people who profess to put the idea of liberty on a pedestal do so pretty selectively and with geographical blinkers firmly in place, so as to make the bias all the more pronounced. Although I'm not necessarily accusing you of that aggravated offence.

Oh no! The poorer you are, more freedom you need and you cherish because poverty enslaves you. Maybe you never were enoughly poor to understand it.
 
U

URBANUS

Guest
First you are young, stupid and socialist. Then, if you are lucky, you grow up.
It really is that simple and many are the examples but some will cling onto the idea of equality and a perfect world and all that bullshit. If anything socialists are career people but their career is all about becoming something out of nothing at the expense of others.
 
V

vegan.cro spirit# 453

Guest
No, you vapid f***ing Nazi troll. To be right wing you need an ideological basis to support social inequality. For some, it is obsessive and artificial support for a vague concept of liberty. For Hitler it was ethnic nationalism and an obsessive belief in social order.

BTW, you might want to set today as an anniversary on your phone, because I am not going to be replying to one of your posts very often.

LOL
lets go back to:

"anyone who would tend to come down on the side of personal liberty is right wing. That's almost a dictionary definition":crazy:

Hitler being RIGHT WING-according to you loons not me- is the EXTREME of the RIGHT WING
thus under your theory he is the DICTIONARY DEFINITION of the TRUE CHAMPION OF LIBERTY.
PRETTY INSANE RIGHT!!:lbf:

You said DICTIONARY DEFINITION> thats pretty definite FOR THE FIVE MINUTES it took for you to make a U turn LOL.

I really wouldnt worry about if I worry about you replying to my posts.:lbf:
 
U

URBANUS

Guest
Sometimes people just become old, they don't grow up.
Keeping in touch with the inner child was always the most important thing according to footballer and actor Eric Cantona but that doesn't mean you need to stay one politically.
 

A scanty bit of thing

I only have eyes for youuuuuu, Aztec!
I have a long, long memory Andrea.
Are you passively aggressively threatening her? And how dare you go back to your old usual tricks, of trying to "out" people on this site, when people perhaps don't need you in their faces, pulling this kind of inflated-ego, faux power trip over them.

Get a f***ing grip.

And leave people alone. And PARTICULARLY, leave vulnerable women alone.
 
Funny how you seem to partly blame people for the Right to Buy and not Thatcher wholly.

London has been engineered to now have a Brit minority. The system want a non-white grateful labour force. This was partly achieved by denying whites social housing - for whatever official reason. I'm not denying that elsewhere things might work differently (for now), but you don't seem to have any knowledge of how wheels turn in London and talk like somebody who works in PR. Everything you say sounds slightly disingenuous (whereas you think I'm a tub-thumping Sun reader).

I don't mean to cause offence but when I read your words the face I imagine speaking them is Tony Blair.

When someone starts a sentence with “No offence, but...“ you can guarantee they're about to come out with something massively offensive.

I don't wholly blame Thatcher because the policy began under Labour. She accelerated it and every government since has failed to reverse it. Prescott did at least enable the building of a lot of social rented homes. I suppose it is a bit harsh of me to put any blame on the working classes because when you're from a poor background and you are offered an overnight money for nothing profit, who is going to turn it down?Although I do know one or two lefties who turned it down on principle.
Seeing as we're in the territory of making assumptions about people (I'm a liar/disingenuous/a leftie... None of which are true) you come across as a bitter paranoiac who thinks all his problems are due to a conspiracy by black people. No offence meant, of course.
 

Uncleskinny

It's all good
Subscriber
Are you passively aggressively threatening her? And how dare you go back to your old usual tricks, of trying to "out" people on this site, when people perhaps don't need you in their faces, pulling this kind of inflated-ego, faux power trip over them.

Get a f***ing grip.

And leave people alone. And PARTICULARLY, leave vulnerable women alone.
Where's the threat, dumbass? f*** off.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
I thought my point was pretty obvious. If Hitler was left wing, why did he brutally target pretty much everyone on the left (including some of the 'socialist' elements in his own party in the Night of the Long Knives), and why was most opposition to him coming from the left, via the SDP and the communists?

Bringing up the Bolsheviks is complete whataboutery. I'm well aware of what they did, and I'm well aware that people on the left have also committed acts of evil brutality. But the topic I was addressing was the statement, "Hitler was left wing". He clearly wasn't.

Is it possible that Hitler - as an extremist - might have been attracted to elements of extreme left wing ideas, as well as elements of extreme right wing ideas? He clearly watched what Lenin, and then Stalin, did in the USSR and admired their use of state power. He clearly thought that global capitalism was corrupt and needed to be overthrown. He had very different ideas about what it should be replaced with, and clearly hated Marxism. But why does all this make people on the left so uncomfortable?
 
Top Bottom