Re: The Smiths on The Beatles...This story is old I know
> Big difference cause Moz is able to see that he is NOT an angel,
> but Lennon with his annoing POWER TO THE PEOPLE,
Actually, he openly declared himself as a bad father to Julian, and a bastard himself. He, (especially in the 80's) but also VERY much in the 60's, (starting after the Jesus scandal) decalred himself as just like anybody else, imperfect. But, If you want to specifically hear him say that watch Imagine.
>was often
> tryieng to prove that he was so kind and cool... LIER
No, It was more of a "we are not perfect" but we would like to do something to make the world a better place. It's like the old vegetarian argument, you can't end all world suffering, and you're not a perfect person but you want to do what you can to make things better. He KNEW he could use his celebrity status to promote politics that he supported. There were SEVERAL organizations that he funded, and promoted through the press outside of the "power to the people" ideas.
Oh, and he was cool. = ) As for kind...no, I don't think he was that kind in himself, I agree.
> I know that very well. I never said that I like Clapton. GOD OF
> GUITAR...
lol
>Hendrix was the only... and please, you don't need to
> say that he was a junkie, ok?
Nope. I think you know that already. But, he's not any less cool, or less of a musician because of it.
> Something is very wrong here, cause it seems that you think you
> keep them real to the history, but NO, you don't. As you can
> see, YOU need to learn more about Lennon and George... not me
No, actually I've read almost everything put out about them, that's including all the documented historical texts. It seems that you have alot of negative opinions towards Lennon, and that gets in the way of how you're gaguing history (ie, you think Lennon was always trying to prove that he was "kind and cool"). But, I'm not going to try anymore, because if you don't see it, then I can't make you.
The End.