B
benny
Guest
you need to learn to read a message and understand the context
i never said you were racist, silly, i said that most of the discussions on the board lately have been racist. there's a BIG difference between the two statments.
scatology is a sexual kink- thus the vulgarity.
i am very likely older than you.
you and bosie need to try and get the entire meaning out of a post and not pick a word or sentence and respond just to it. it makes you both look, literally, like true arses.
(;^o
> benny,
> have you not graduated from primary school yet? they never
> stopped calling me arse-y either, the affectionate, albeit
> rudimentary "-y"still stays. how old are you benny?
> you obviously can not wield the english language very well. what
> words did i spout that you are not cognizant of? how did you
> misconstrew my meaning. it had nothing whatsoever to do with
> vulgarity nor racism.(when in doubt,resort to racism). it was
> jest and was an implicature that simply had the underlying
> girders of "the contents of your writings are nothing but
> stupid @#!!! e." there, now that i translated what i meant
> into philistine terms perhaps your feeble, lackluster mind may
> comprehend.
> lovingly,
> your hemmoroid
> p.s. i'm flaring up.
i never said you were racist, silly, i said that most of the discussions on the board lately have been racist. there's a BIG difference between the two statments.
scatology is a sexual kink- thus the vulgarity.
i am very likely older than you.
you and bosie need to try and get the entire meaning out of a post and not pick a word or sentence and respond just to it. it makes you both look, literally, like true arses.
(;^o
> benny,
> have you not graduated from primary school yet? they never
> stopped calling me arse-y either, the affectionate, albeit
> rudimentary "-y"still stays. how old are you benny?
> you obviously can not wield the english language very well. what
> words did i spout that you are not cognizant of? how did you
> misconstrew my meaning. it had nothing whatsoever to do with
> vulgarity nor racism.(when in doubt,resort to racism). it was
> jest and was an implicature that simply had the underlying
> girders of "the contents of your writings are nothing but
> stupid @#!!! e." there, now that i translated what i meant
> into philistine terms perhaps your feeble, lackluster mind may
> comprehend.
> lovingly,
> your hemmoroid
> p.s. i'm flaring up.