thanks BERLIN

Re: they are HUMANS, so they are not perfect

> Gays are no more promiscuous than straights. The number of
> "straight" married men with wifes and children that
> secretly rendevous with gay men is staggering. There are tons of
> married "straight" men "looking for some discreet
> fun" with gay men. Not to mention all those married men
> having affairs with other women. Straight men are no better than
> gay men.

whoever you are, you deserve a hug for such clever point. have a great day.
 
Re: Gays are promiscuous

> Gays are no more promiscuous than straights. The number of
> "straight" married men with wifes and children that
> secretly rendevous with gay men is staggering. There are tons of
> married "straight" men "looking for some discreet
> fun" with gay men. Not to mention all those married men
> having affairs with other women. Straight men are no better than
> gay men.

What a bizarre message, if men have 'rendevous' with other men, they can not be considered straight, they are clearly queers. Married men having affairs or normal single men sleeping around could not even begin to sleep with the numbers that gays get through.
 
That shows how little you know

> What a bizarre message, if men have 'rendevous' with other men,
> they can not be considered straight, they are clearly queers.

Yes, they are clearly "queer", however, there are many many men who are "queer" who have wives/children. In the closet. Jump on AOL and look at all the "bimarriedmen" and "str8butcurious" type chatrooms.

> Married men having affairs or normal single men sleeping around
> could not even begin to sleep with the numbers that gays get
> through.

Seeing that gay men make up approximately 10% of the population, your remark here is way off base and shows just how little you think!
 
Re: That shows how little you know

> Yes, they are clearly "queer", however, there are many
> many men who are "queer" who have wives/children. In
> the closet. Jump on AOL and look at all the
> "bimarriedmen" and "str8butcurious" type
> chatrooms.

Whats this got to do with promiscuity ? sounds like your fantasies.

> Seeing that gay men make up approximately 10% of the population,
> your remark here is way off base and shows just how little you
> think!
What ? I am saying that on average gay men sleep with many more people than straights do. What is your '10%' got to do with that ? You are clearly as confused intellectually as you are morally. Health surveys across the globe prove that homosexuals are extremely promiscuous, where's the debate ? You will be telling me next that your lot don't hang around parks and toilets, @#!!!ing animals.
 
Is that why AIDS is rising quicker in the straight community??
 
you sound jealous

You must not be getting any yourself. Jealous?? Maybe gays are more promiscuous, but then gay men look a hell of a lot more attractive, are well kept, and cleaner than the average straight man, so no wonder they get more sex.

Try 8 weeks on Jenny Craig and maybe you'll start to get some sex too you fat phuck!

> Whats this got to do with promiscuity ? sounds like your
> fantasies.
> What ? I am saying that on average gay men sleep with many more
> people than straights do. What is your '10%' got to do with that
> ? You are clearly as confused intellectually as you are morally.
> Health surveys across the globe prove that homosexuals are
> extremely promiscuous, where's the debate ? You will be telling
> me next that your lot don't hang around parks and toilets,
> @#!!! ing animals.
 
Re: you sound jealous

> You must not be getting any yourself. Jealous?? Maybe gays are
> more promiscuous, but then gay men look a hell of a lot more
> attractive, are well kept, and cleaner than the average straight
> man, so no wonder they get more sex.

> Try 8 weeks on Jenny Craig and maybe you'll start to get some
> sex too you fat phuck!

When I say I don't like Robbie Williams music, very shallow people respond with 'oh, you're just jealous'. They are unable to comprehend anything deeper. They respond with knee-jerk frightened responses. Hmmmm....I am seeing a pattern. You prove my point nicely, thank you.
 
Re: Is that why AIDS is rising quicker in the straight community??

That's gay propaganda. The incidence among white heterosexual westerners is minute, so stating that the rate has increased (ie percentage increase based on previous known cases), is to say, 0.02% to 0.08%. Look at the raw data and you will find that 98% of HIV cases are IVDA's and or Homosexual males (excluding haemophiliacs). Try again @#!!!wit.
 
Re: you sound jealous

> You must not be getting any yourself. Jealous?? Maybe gays are
> more promiscuous, but then gay men look a hell of a lot more
> attractive, are well kept, and cleaner than the average straight
> man, so no wonder they get more sex.

> Try 8 weeks on Jenny Craig and maybe you'll start to get some
> sex too you fat phuck!

Incidentally, I am not fat. I would suggest you refrain from expressing your size phobia here as some of the gays are quite overweight.
 
AIDS statistics from the CDC

AIDS CASES BY EXPOSURE CATEGORY

EXPOSURE CATEGORY MALE FEMALE TOTAL*
Men who have sex with men 348,657 - 348,657
Injecting Drug Use 137,650 51,592 189,242
Men who have sex with
men and inject drugs 47,820 - 47,820
Hemophilia/coagulation disorder 4,847 274 5,121
Heterosexual contact 27,952 50,257 78,210
Recipient of blood transfusion,
blood components, or tissue 4,920 3,746 8,666
Risk not reported or identified 48,343 19,042 67,387

As I said, the tides are turning. Heterosexual hiv aids cases are rising quicker than you think. The above is data as of January 2, 2001 per the CDC. Go read the trends for yourself at www.cdc.gov and you'll see that new hiv cases are rising the fastest amungst heterosexual women. It's NOT just a gay disease anymore....open your eyes Blind phuck!!

> That's gay propaganda. The incidence among white heterosexual
> westerners is minute, so stating that the rate has increased (ie
> percentage increase based on previous known cases), is to say,
> 0.02% to 0.08%. Look at the raw data and you will find that 98%
> of HIV cases are IVDA's and or Homosexual males (excluding
> haemophiliacs). Try again @#!!! wit.




http://www.cdc.gov
 
Re: AIDS statistics from the CDC

> AIDS CASES BY EXPOSURE CATEGORY

> EXPOSURE CATEGORY MALE FEMALE TOTAL*
> Men who have sex with men 348,657 - 348,657
> Injecting Drug Use 137,650 51,592 189,242
> Men who have sex with
> men and inject drugs 47,820 - 47,820
> Hemophilia/coagulation disorder 4,847 274 5,121
> Heterosexual contact 27,952 50,257 78,210
> Recipient of blood transfusion,
> blood components, or tissue 4,920 3,746 8,666
> Risk not reported or identified 48,343 19,042 67,387

> As I said, the tides are turning. Heterosexual hiv aids cases
> are rising quicker than you think. The above is data as of
> January 2, 2001 per the CDC. Go read the trends for yourself at
> www.cdc.gov and you'll see that new hiv cases are rising the
> fastest amungst heterosexual women. It's NOT just a gay disease
> anymore....open your eyes Blind phuck!!

You use USA figures. Even if your claim of 78, 210 were accurate, of a population of 200 million it proves my point. Also women are being infected by bi-sexual men, who then infect straight men, so the increase is largely the responsibility of 'men who have sex with men'. But your figures are bogus anyway, unless you have missed part of the equation out, because homosexual aids cases ( I was talking about HIV, but you pulled these AIDS figures out) far exceed 350,000. Also you don't offer any time frame, so how do you know its a true increase ? I am fairly confident that you don't even know what you are looking at when you read statistics, but prove me wrong !
 
Re: AIDS statistics from the CDC

I'm not even going to bother arguing with an idiot. See you at the clinic!!

> You use USA figures. Even if your claim of 78, 210 were
> accurate, of a population of 200 million it proves my point.
> Also women are being infected by bi-sexual men, who then infect
> straight men, so the increase is largely the responsibility of
> 'men who have sex with men'. But your figures are bogus anyway,
> unless you have missed part of the equation out, because
> homosexual aids cases ( I was talking about HIV, but you pulled
> these AIDS figures out) far exceed 350,000. Also you don't offer
> any time frame, so how do you know its a true increase ? I am
> fairly confident that you don't even know what you are looking
> at when you read statistics, but prove me wrong !
 
Re: AIDS statistics from the CDC

> I'm not even going to bother arguing with an idiot. See you at
> the clinic!!

The truth hurts doesn't it ?
 
And I suppose you will try to say it is also the #1 killer too.
 
hibernianbilly

Morrissey must be extremely proud that he has such narrow minded, pathetic, fascistic fans as yourself.

For the record, heterosexual cases of HIV in the UK last year outnumbered those for homosexual.

Hibernianbilly? Shouldn't that be HILLbilly?
 
Re: Gays are promiscuous

> Gays are no more promiscuous than straights. The number of
> "straight" married men with wifes and children that
> secretly rendevous with gay men is staggering. There are tons of
> married "straight" men "looking for some discreet
> fun" with gay men. Not to mention all those married men
> having affairs with other women. Straight men are no better than
> gay men.

Stop talking about my Dad!

LMC x
 
Re: AIDS statistics from the CDC

> You use USA figures. Even if your claim of 78, 210 were
> accurate, of a population of 200 million it proves my point.
> Also women are being infected by bi-sexual men, who then infect
> straight men, so the increase is largely the responsibility of
> 'men who have sex with men'. But your figures are bogus anyway,
> unless you have missed part of the equation out, because
> homosexual aids cases ( I was talking about HIV, but you pulled
> these AIDS figures out) far exceed 350,000. Also you don't offer
> any time frame, so how do you know its a true increase ? I am
> fairly confident that you don't even know what you are looking
> at when you read statistics, but prove me wrong !

In the UK, more women contracted HIV than men did last year.

LMC
 
Re: AIDS statistics from the CDC

> The truth hurts doesn't it ?

But even if you are right, what do you want? A prize?

LMC
 
Re: AIDS statistics from the CDC

> In the UK, more women contracted HIV than men did last year.

> LMC

And you source for that information please ? The manner of contraction please ? Best get back to your Chaucer darling and leave the science for the big boys.
 
Re: Gays are promiscuous

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

I wish we were as promiscuous as Gay men.I would not mind having sex with 5-6 women a night in Pub toilets before having a wander around the dancefloor looking for another victim.

Stop talking about my Dad!

> LMC x
 
Back
Top Bottom