Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Nerak" data-source="post: 1987317770" data-attributes="member: 29417">I won't be looking at Moz's Twatter mentions until we're a lot further past the current SCANDAL.These haters though <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="🙄" title="Face with rolling eyes&nbsp; &nbsp; :rolling_eyes:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/6.0/png/unicode/64/1f644.png" data-shortname=":rolling_eyes:" /> - how quickly they forget that the press have been out to nail him as a reactionary and/or hypocrite ever since they wrongly (IMO) nailed him as a Right On. It's the obvious place to go in the absence of other stories (sex, drugs blah de blah).Look at this from The Guardian (2007) where he's like a Daily Mail editorial for a song about a terrified teacher &amp; he's reactionary because he questions the competence of the police?????!!!??? Even the tax thing is dubious - how progressive was the Poll Tax??? [ATTACH=full]58666[/ATTACH]</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Nerak, post: 1987317770, member: 29417"] I won't be looking at Moz's Twatter mentions until we're a lot further past the current SCANDAL. These haters though 🙄 - how quickly they forget that the press have been out to nail him as a reactionary and/or hypocrite ever since they wrongly (IMO) nailed him as a Right On. It's the obvious place to go in the absence of other stories (sex, drugs blah de blah). Look at this from The Guardian (2007) where he's like a Daily Mail editorial for a song about a terrified teacher & he's reactionary because he questions the competence of the police?????!!!??? Even the tax thing is dubious - how progressive was the Poll Tax??? [ATTACH type="full"]58666[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]

Name

Verification