It's not that hard to know what they are thinking. This started with a murder case where it appeared that the person who
murdered a rancher fled to Mexico.
From the first link we get this:
"Investigators say they believe an illegal immigrant shot Krentz because he was overheard on the radio earlier Saturday saying to his brother "illegal immigrant" and "hurt." That was the last contact before law enforcement found him dead in his ATV later that night.
Search teams tracked footprints 20 miles south to the U.S./ Mexico border, but don't have any suspects."
The second link is a google search result showing that people (white people) flee to Mexico. Who knew? Anyone that has ever watched a few cowboy movies.
Anyway, that case of the murdered rancher, who may very well have been murdered by an "illegal" is what got this issue fired up in the first place. The evidence is sketchy, but we can say that is what happened. I'm not going to get into any speculation about it. Someone died and little is known about what led to it. It's unlikely that someone would come to the US to commit a random murder, but there are all sorts of possible scenarios. The point is, this is "what they were thinking."
It does no one any good to pretend that we can't see who the law is aimed at. But we don't have to debate that either. Let's say that it's aimed at Canadians if you prefer.
The point is, there are already laws that keep Canadians from coming here illegally. If these Canadians are stopped and do not have papers, well, unless they talk like these guys
they'll probably let you go. I carry ID pretty much all the time, but I don't have to, and someone in this country from Canada wouldn't have to, either, it's pretty safe to say.
But someone in this country from Mexico is ALREADY REQUIRED to have documents. That is the reason this law is simply a tool to justify police racial profiling. Before the law, they would need cause to pull over a US born Latino. Now, if they happened to pull over an undocumented immigrant without cause, it wouldn't really matter, because the person wouldn't be able to fight it. They would be in the system, in their way back to Mexico, and no one is going to be interested in hearing their side of the story. They are clearly in the wrong in the eyes of the law.
BUT, if the police had stopped a US citizen without cause, in violation of their rights, before this law, that person would have had a case. They would have had a means of recourse. What can happen now is that a US citizen can be stopped for no reason, and the police can say that they wanted to look at their papers. If this person is like many of us, and might have left their home without ID, they can now be arrested for that.
Do you see the problem? This law does not protect the border. This law does not prevent someone from getting emergency healthcare (and what's wrong with that anyway? we send billions in aid to other countries) this law exists for one reason. This law exists to allow the police to stop people who look like they might be from another country. There's no reason to pretend that means they are going to stop white people to see if they know the words to "Oh, Cananda."