That was my first question, to where exactly?
And as you can read in my post, I made a very clear exception for the real victims which seem to be the greatest part. And I really feel for them and sympathise.
Maybe I read more into what realitybites wrote literary, and I misjudged what she actually meant.
I don’t know.
Am I always half apoligistic when someone says something stupid on this site?
I wasn’t aware of that. I will think about that.
Am I hurting any real innocent victims by expressing some doubt about some claims of sexual harassment and rape by some people? That wasn’t my intention at all.
But sleeping away around to get to the top and later complaining you were sexually harassed and raped isn’t that as bad and disgusting too? Just asking.
I support in general the #metoo action as a way for victims to speak out and get all the frustrations, the humiliation out of their system.
But there are some doubtful statements too, not from real victims.
No, I agree with everything you're saying Quando. It's just that, what you're saying, is
not what RB said.
And her post made me furious in its throw away, paint-everyone-with-the-same-brush, level of sheer idiocy. Furthermore, she didn't just "express doubt" about the "claims" of some sexual harassment victims or about any victims of rape. She actively posted that "we all" are perpetrators of sexual assault "on some level". So yeah, sorry to point out the obvious, but someone is going to take the time to be offended at that, and to post a negative rebuttal.
I don't actually think she probably
meant all of what she posted either. But! That's WHY people should
THINK before they start hammering away at their keyboards, like mindless gerbils on a wheel.
The fact that there will always be some doubtful statements from alleged victims is unfortunate and disgusting, without a doubt.
But that was what you read into her post, and
not what she said. I really don't feel the need to hash this out anymore. My criticism was with her statement, and not with yours. I just pointed out that when you did answer, you weren't even answering what she actually said, but a more positively nuanced version - which was unfortunately not what came out of her mouth, and which was just your own, and rather kind, interpretation of what
could have come out of her mouth, as an
alternative.
Sometimes, it might take someone - for reasons unknown to you or to me or to realitybites - a couple of decades to voice anything, about the reality of a sexual assault they have previously experienced. This is not entirely uncommon.
So really, if RB has been lucky enough to have never experienced the kinds of assaults that she's so easily passing comment on, then she should keep her big mouth shut.
As I said, for human decency's sake if for no reasons of
logic, it would categorically be best for everyone to just move on from her comments. Her comments served no one and nothing well.