Political posters in New York

Re: Posters in New York

\

You are so full of absolute statements that ignore reality it is almost comical.
I certainly didn't call you a devout Christian. You are a citizen from a Christian nation. Is it too much to call you a Christian...you certainly have no problem grouping together all Muslims as terrorists with claims that their entire religion is based on jihad. You support Trump who when talking about Mexican immigrants said they were rapists....but some of them were good people.
All religion is flawed, but to single out Islam and ignore the failings of Christianity again shows your obvious bias.


Need you continue???
...please don't continue, we get enough xenophobia, bigotry, and racist remarks from Trump without you coming on this website and promoting them as something good and justified and something that is best for America.

My religion is irrelevant. That was my point.

I never said "all Muslims are terrorists." You leftists are so good at misquoting that you ought to make it an art form. Oh wait, the liberal media already have in the guise of journalism! Do you really mean to suggest that Islam is not to blame for the mass migrant rapes in Europe and the daily attacks in their own nations? Islam is unique in these regards. No other ideology is connected to such violence and destruction.

Even in liberal and multicultural Canada 64% of Muslim Canadians reject homosexuality and 40% believe the father must be the "master" of the home. Do you think these beliefs are acceptable in Western society?

Trump never said "Mexican immigrants are rapists." He said that many ILLEGAL ALIENS are criminals including rapists and drug dealers. Many of these people are not even Mexican. Great job misquoting again! It seems that you are the one speaking in absolutes. You are misquoting statements and ignoring facts in order to frame this as a singular argument of "Muslims are victims! They are good people!" Well the focus of radical Islam differs from that impractical narrative. The point is that it is impossible to separate out the radical Muslims from the non-radicals with regard to migrants. How can you let in the good people when bad apples are among them and cannot be separated out? Why are the majority of asylum seekers men? Wouldn't one expect primarily women and children to be the asylum seekers?

What do you suggest the West does with regard to Islamic terrorism and the migrant crisis, then? If you are going to denounce the suggestions of others, you ought to have ideas of your own.

Have a chew on this to get you started: https://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/articles/10-reasons-not-peace.aspx
 
Last edited:
Re: Posters in New York

I wish somebody would throw you off a f***ing roof.

If I went to Pakistan someone quite likely would if I chose to engage in certain preferred activities. And that's a problem.

But thanks for the lovely sentiments.
 
Re: Posters in New York

If I went to Pakistan someone quite likely would if I chose to engage in certain preferred activities. And that's a problem.

But thanks for the lovely sentiments.

I see nothing problematic about it. Go to Pakistan?
 
And sanders supporters start throwing chairs at the Nebraska democratic convention and sanders barley says anything just like when they chanted English only at a Hispanic seventy something civil rights hero but hey she was a Clinton supporter. Whatever he's says his supporter are horrible. They're trying to woo super delegates when before they sent them messages of hate and even death threats saying they were undemocratic. Now that they need them to keep there revolution going they're all about them and there support. They've never in history that I know of supported a candidate who did not win more of the popular vote
 
Derek, Pakistan rarely wins human rights competitions, but are you actually aware of any case of gay people being thrown off roofs there, or are you just a bullshitter? Inquiring minds wish to know.
 
Yeah I've been aware of the trolling but others who might never post, which is understandable in a conversation like this, also might be viewing so it can be a good opportunity to at least make good counter points for those who take things and themselves more seriously. This election will make a difference here depending on who wins for a multitude of reasons. Life can get a lot worse for those at the bottom very quickly. much much worse
 
OK, Derek, so the answer is you're a bullshitter, as I suspected.
 
Yeah expecting an answer and not him dodging is pretty pointless.
 
On another note yay for Hillary almost finishing this up. About a hundred more delegates to go. Also boo for open primaries where republicans can now vote to disrupt the democratic primary
 
Like when he asked a direct question about knowing any gay people town off roofs and you responded by saying Islam hates me. That's dodging a question which is what affirmed you as a bullshitter or when you "read" the piece I posted about sanders and replied with if you don't like Hilary then you must be anti women and I asked if you had anything to say about the multiple points posted in the article and came back with nothing. That's dodging. Trying to change the subject when you've no answer is dodging etc but again this has become a waste of time. About the equivalent of click bait so here's another piece from Newsweek, I know it's not YouTube but they have a somewhat good reputation for news and analysis, about sanders self centered self righteous campaign and his increasingly autocratic whining hypocritical supporters

http://www.newsweek.com/bernie-sanders-get-control-get-out-race-461195
 
Where's the bullshit?

You claimed above that gay visitors to Pakistan can expect to be thrown off the roofs of tall buildings. Now, make no mistake, Pakistan is not an easy place to be gay, but gay people do both live in Pakistan and visit it, and AFAIK there are no documented cases of any of them being thrown off any tall buildings.

So, what you said was bullshit. Not only that, but it was racist/Islamophobic bullshit aimed at conflating "Muslims" and "ISIS".
 
And some more words the gentle and kind sanders campaigne

From the Washington post

"
Let’s examine what Bernie Sanders supporters did in his name over the weekend.

As the Nevada Democratic convention voted to award a majority of delegates to Hillary Clinton — an accurate reflection of her victory in the state’s February caucuses — Sanders backers charged the stage, threw chairs and shouted vulgar epithets at speakers. Security agents had to protect the dais and ultimately clear the room.

Sanders supporters publicized the cellphone number of the party chairwoman, Roberta Lange, resulting in thousands of abusive text messages and threats:

“Praying to God someone shoots you in the FACE and blows your democracy-stealing head off!”

“Hey b***h. . . We know where you live. Where you work. Where you eat. Where your kids go to school/grandkids. . . Prepare for hell.”

Veteran Nevada reporter Jon Ralston transcribed some of the choice voicemail messages for the chairwoman, some with vulgar labels for women and their anatomy:

“I think people like you should be hung in a public execution. . . . You are a sick, twisted piece of s--- and I hope you burn for this!”

“You f*****g stupid b***h! What the hell are you doing? You’re a f*****g corrupt b***h!”

The day after the convention, Sanders supporters vandalized party headquarters with messages saying, among other things, “you are scum.”

And the candidate’s response to the violent and misogynistic behavior of his backers? Mostly defiance. Asked by reporters Tuesday about the convention chaos — in which operatives from his national campaign participated — Sanders walked away in the middle of the question.

Finally, mid-afternoon Tuesday, Sanders released a statement saying, “I condemn any and all forms of violence, including the personal harassment of individuals.” But he blamed the Nevada party for preventing a “fair and transparent process,” and he threatened Democrats: “If the Democratic Party is to be successful in November, it is imperative that all state parties treat our campaign supporters with fairness and the respect that they have earned.”

It is no longer accurate to say Sanders is campaigning against Clinton, who has essentially locked up the nomination. The Vermont socialist is now running against the Democratic Party. And that’s excellent news for one Donald J. Trump.

“The Sanders Campaign spent its time either ignoring or profiting from the chaos it did much to create,” the Nevada Democratic Party wrote in a formal complaint to the Democratic National Committee. The state party wrote, “Part of the approach by the Sanders campaign was to employ these easily-incensed delegates as shock troops.” The Sanders representatives “at the times of most intense crisis offered little more than shrugs and smirks.”

To read the full piece

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opini...want-to-be-the-ralph-nader-of-2016/ar-BBtaINs
 

Trending Threads

Back
Top Bottom