Political posters in New York

Re: Posters in New York

... i know it's over

 

[Calamine Lotion]

 

[nicky wire's legs]

 

[Anonymous]

Cool two thumbs up from the future president. You must be so gentle and kind to do this. So in California independents are allowed to vote in the democratic primary but have to fill out a form to do so to receive a ballot with the presidential primary candidates on it as most of there voting is done by mail. Over fifty percent have been polled as saying they want to participate but only fourteen percent filled out the form. Guess they didn't have time to read that either. Wonder if they'll complain about the system being rigged against there laziness and decide to throw chairs and threaten more establishment people. A lot of Bernie supporters remind me of the spoiled college kids I met in school constantly going on about socialism as they lived a lazy life thanks to capitalism

 

[Calamine Lotion]

 

[Anonymous]

There's a candidate more your style I'm guessing. No time to read just time to look up videos and pics for nonsensical responses

 

[Calamine Lotion]

Is one of these you? lol

 

[Anonymous]

I know I look young but not that young. Also you're calling me a child when you refuse to read legitimate news but instead post pics of memes Russel brand and YouTube videos when trying to make a point in politics. You're the one continuing a childish dispute, making it more childish by the post, when you could try to make a serious point but I don't think you capable honestly. That's why you deflect with nonsense. Bernie probably is a candidate more your speed as he couldn't explain himself either she given the chance. I'm off to Starbucks for the moment but I'll be back to see what new pic you'll post next to put me in my place. Maybe it'll be one about grammar. Probably

 

[Layne]

The Clintons are vile.

Many women and blacks are refusing to acknowledge her problems with women and blacks. They also ignore the factual reality of which candidate will actually institute policies that benefit women and blacks.

Women and blacks will only acquiesce to hurting themselves by voting in Clinton. Sad!

Luckily for women and blacks, Clinton will lose and they will be very glad for it later.

 

[Anonymous]

What policies are those exactly. Are they executive actions or do they need to pass congress. With the election
Almost over I'd say most have already made there choice. A vote also isn't total approval even if for Clinton and we're talking about Hilary and not her husband even if he does get put in charge of some office. Maybe people just voted for whom they thought best out of the candidates they were presented. Voted for the one who would they thought would get the most done

 

[Layne]

What policies are those exactly. Are they executive actions or do they need to pass congress. With the election
Almost over I'd say most have already made there choice. A vote also isn't total approval even if for Clinton and we're talking about Hilary and not her husband even if he does get put in charge of some office. Maybe people just voted for whom they thought best out of the candidates they were presented. Voted for the one who would they thought would get the most done

She already announced her husband will be in charge of "the economy."

The election is not really "almost over." By this time next month, even, Clinton could lose another ~5 percent in the polls and Trump could gain another ~5 percent if the current trends continue. Plus we have to wait and see what happens with Bernard.

The policies I'm referring to are Trump's. He will bring back jobs while Hilly and Billy will be content to continue letting them leave the country, thus hurting America's poorest AMERICANS--quite especially inner-city blacks.

Wanna see the race divide widen? Vote for Clinton. Wanna see more bathroom brawls? Vote for Clinton. Wanna hear more about the non-existent wage gap and how women ought to hate men? Vote for Clinton. It's all divide and conquer nonsense that serves to better no one except for the rich globalist establishment.

 

[Anonymous]

Jobs from the man who declared bankruptcy all over losing people many of there jobs and screwing his investors. No thanks and how's he gonna do this specifically. Bring the jobs I mean. You can't say and won't. The bathroom issue is also very important for its other less talked about provisions. The one that doesn't let cities enact there own equality laws the one that allows businesses to discriminate over sexual orientation already used by a fertility clinic to deny a lesbian couple. They were told they don't serve gays and now the city itself can't do anything about it even though the majority of them voted to pass bans on decrimination

 

[Layne]

Jobs from the man who declared bankruptcy all over losing people many of there jobs and screwing his investors. No thanks and how's he gonna do this specifically. Bring the jobs I mean. You can't say and won't. The bathroom issue is also very important for its other less talked about provisions. The one that doesn't let cities enact there own equality laws the one that allows businesses to discriminate over sexual orientation already used by a fertility clinic to deny a lesbian couple. They were told they don't serve gays and now the city itself can't do anything about it even though the majority of them voted to pass bans on decrimination

"Jobs from the man who declared bankruptcy"
Good! You don't understand how the industry works--and nor do I--but when you make hundreds of deals, some fail. This amounts to the "why try anything in life because I might fail" or "people aren't allowed to make mistakes" argument. That's not how life works. He turned 1 million into tens of billions. Do you fault people for attempting things in life and succeeding 90% (or whatever) of the time?

"how's he gonna do this specifically"
I shouldn't have to inform you on basic policy but he has said you have to prevent companies from leaving by enforcing financial penalties for leaving. And you have to renegotiate trade deals so it is actually profitable for companies to stay, which right now it is not. You have to create a favourable environment for companies to come back as well--which isn't immediately achieved. There's no miracle solution that will take effect in one day--it will be a process in order to address what is really a large-scale disaster. But certainly continuing to allow jobs to leave and raising the minimum wage isn't going to help. The jobs are going to foreign nations and robots!

"The bathroom issue"
It's a non-issue. Trump said leave it up to the states. You realize the bathroom debate only started because the left and Obama got it rolling, right? It's a distraction from bigger issues.

"fertility clinic to deny a lesbian couple"
If you indicate what story you are referring to and provide a source, then I can address whatever it is you're talking about there.

 

[Anonymous]

Yes he made money for Himself through a loan and and an inheritance and his financial disclosure listed a lot of gross income statements for him and his businesses but not personal net income or net income for his businesses. As for his job creation plans he's given no specifics except a tarif on goods from China, which also wasn't very specific, and of course even these plans are in his own words only suggestions. Very vauge suggestions about the stuff. His big plans or his great so great suggestions that are non existent. As for the bathroom issue you can read the law itself or the article I already posted about it on this website. You probably can't read that well either or just enjoy wasting my time. Maybe it makes you feel good or just gives you something to do.

 

[Anonymous]

Eh took less than a min to look up and copy and I'll post it again as even if Derek is full of it people should know ths specifics of what they're tLkkng about so here's the article again if anyone cares to read it. It is kinda important in its specifics as it's not just a law about bathrooms

From ABC news

Kelly Trent, 39, left, and Beverly Newell, 45, allege a fertility clinic refused to see them due to the fact they were a same sex couple.more +


A North Carolina couple has joined a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union alleging that North Carolina's controversial law known as House Bill 2, which critics say is "anti-LGBT," has led to discrimination.

Beverly Newell, 45, and Kelly Trent, 39, allege a fertility clinic refused to see them due to the fact they are a same-sex couple. The married couple said the fertility clinic, which they have not named, called them to cancel their appointment after HB2 was signed into law saying it does not serve same-sex couples, the ACLU announced today.

“It’s unnerving to know that we could be turned away by any business for being a same-sex couple and have no recourse because of HB2,” Newell said in a statement today. "HB2 has encouraged this type of conduct and we no longer have the ability to file discrimination complaints when this type of thing happens in our home city of Charlotte. The bill has made it OK to harm LGBT people. The state of North Carolina is better than this."



North Carolina's Controversial 'Anti-LGBT' Bill Explained




Trans Teen's Lawsuit Against School Can Go Forward, Appeals Court Rules




What It Feels Like to Be a Young Transgender Man in the Shadow of North Carolina's 'Bathroom Law'


The couple did not name the fertility clinic in the filing but pointed out that the North Carolina bill permitted the clinic to discriminate against them. The lawsuit, originally filed in March in U.S. District Court in North Carolina, was amended today to include additional plaintiffs, including Newell and Trent, and the defendants include North Carolina Gov. Pat McCrory.

House Bill 2, formally known as the Public Facilities Privacy and Security Act, declares that state law overrides all local ordinances concerning wages, employment and public accommodations. It was signed into law by Gov. McCrory in March. The law bars local municipalities from creating their own rules prohibiting discrimination in public places based on sexual orientation and gender identity. Though North Carolina does have a statewide nondiscrimination law, it does not include specific protections for LGBT people.

The HB2 law also directs all public schools, government agencies and public college campuses to require that multiple-occupancy bathrooms and changing facilities, such as locker rooms, be designated for use only by people based on their "biological sex" as stated on their birth certificates. Transgender people can use the bathrooms and changing facilities that correspond to their gender identities only if they get the biological sex on their birth certificates changed.

Lambda Legal, the ACLU, and the ACLU of North Carolina filed a lawsuit on March 28 challenging HB2, which includes limitations in protections for transgender people. The law bans people from using bathrooms that don't match the sex indicated on their birth certificate. That original filing was amended today to include Newell and Trent, according to the ACLU.

“Beverly and Kelly deserve to feel secure in knowing that when they go about their daily lives in Charlotte and interact with businesses open to the public, any discrimination they encounter is illegal. HB2 robs them of that,” Chris Brook, legal director of the ACLU of North Carolina, said in a statement today. “This law gives people the green light to discriminate against LGBT people and sends a daily message that LGBT people across the state are not worthy of dignity and respect.”

In its filing, the ACLU alleges that before HB2 passed, Newell and Trent would have been protected due to a Charlotte ordinance that expanded anti-discrimination protections to include LGBT people.

"HB2 has exposed them to discrimination based on sexual orientation," ACLU Senior Staff Attorney Elizabeth Gill told ABC News. "It was their experience that all of the discussion about HB2 and its effects was basically giving license to businesses in the state to discriminate. They did experience discrimination and are worried it would happen again."

A third plaintiff, a transgender teen, was also added to the lawsuit today.

More and more businesses and celebrities have publicly voiced their pleas to McCrory and state lawmakers to repeal HB2 in recent weeks.

Over 160 CEOs and business leaders signed an open letter with the Human Rights Campaign and Equality North Carolina earlier this month, urging the bill's repeal in the state's upcoming legislative session on Monday.

Additionally, the chambers of commerce for greater Raleigh and greater Durham, two of North Carolina's biggest cities, have called for HB2's repeal. And NBA Commissioner Adam Silver said today the league has made contingency plans for the 2017 All-Star Game, though it has not set a deadline to decide whether it will be in Charlotte.

 

[Layne]

Yes he made money for Himself through a loan and and an inheritance and his financial disclosure listed a lot of gross income statements for him and his businesses but not personal net income or net income for his businesses. As for his job creation plans he's given no specifics except a tarif on goods from China, which also wasn't very specific, and of course even these plans are in his own words only suggestions. Very vauge suggestions about the stuff. His big plans or his great so great suggestions that are non existent. As for the bathroom issue you can read the law itself or the article I already posted about it on this website. You probably can't read that well either or just enjoy wasting my time. Maybe it makes you feel good or just gives you something to do.

I didn't ask you to copy and paste an article. I asked you to explain your position and what you had to say about it. But maybe copying and pasting the words of others to conceal the fact that you have none of your own "makes you feel good or just gives you something to do."

Loan... blah blah blah... inheritance... blah blah blah. Yes, clearly just about anyone could accomplish what Donald Trump has accomplished which is exactly why everyone does. Oh wait, they don't. Your argument is so weak. You have nothing to say.

Trump's plans are innovative and anti-globalist. They serve to improve the situation for Americans. Explain what you would do if you think you know better.

EVERYTHING ANY CANDIDATE SAYS IS A SUGGESTION. He has made that point clear because it's a simple fact--neither he, nor any other candidate, has the power to implement any policies as of yet. Everything is open to negotiation and further investigation. After all, it's better to do the best thing and the right thing rather than to act in absolutes and make errors. It's called reasonability and responsibility. Or would you care to dispute that point beyond reason as well?

Hillary's and Bernie's plans are much better, then? More specific? More beneficial to working-class Americans? OK, please do continue.

All you can do is make empty statements and throw in disparaging barbs. Yes, clearly I can't f***ing read. Clearly disagreeing opinions requires a superiority-inferiority binary. Clearly everything exists in "good or bad" absolutes. That's how the left is.

Time for you to get out of inversion world.

 

[Layne]

Eh took less than a min to look up and copy and I'll post it again as even if Derek is full of it people should know ths specifics of what they're tLkkng about so here's the article again if anyone cares to read it. It is kinda important in its specifics as it's not just a law about bathrooms

From ABC news

Kelly Trent, 39, left, and Beverly Newell, 45, allege a fertility clinic refused to see them due to the fact they were a same sex couple.more +


A North Carolina couple has joined a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union alleging that North Carolina's controversial law known as House Bill 2, which critics say is "anti-LGBT," has led to discrimination.

Beverly Newell, 45, and Kelly Trent, 39, allege a fertility clinic refused to see them due to the fact they are a same-sex couple. The married couple said the fertility clinic, which they have not named, called them to cancel their appointment after HB2 was signed into law saying it does not serve same-sex couples, the ACLU announced today.

“It’s unnerving to know that we could be turned away by any business for being a same-sex couple and have no recourse because of HB2,” Newell said in a statement today. "HB2 has encouraged this type of conduct and we no longer have the ability to file discrimination complaints when this type of thing happens in our home city of Charlotte. The bill has made it OK to harm LGBT people. The state of North Carolina is better than this."



North Carolina's Controversial 'Anti-LGBT' Bill Explained




Trans Teen's Lawsuit Against School Can Go Forward, Appeals Court Rules




What It Feels Like to Be a Young Transgender Man in the Shadow of North Carolina's 'Bathroom Law'


The couple did not name the fertility clinic in the filing but pointed out that the North Carolina bill permitted the clinic to discriminate against them. The lawsuit, originally filed in March in U.S. District Court in North Carolina, was amended today to include additional plaintiffs, including Newell and Trent, and the defendants include North Carolina Gov. Pat McCrory.

House Bill 2, formally known as the Public Facilities Privacy and Security Act, declares that state law overrides all local ordinances concerning wages, employment and public accommodations. It was signed into law by Gov. McCrory in March. The law bars local municipalities from creating their own rules prohibiting discrimination in public places based on sexual orientation and gender identity. Though North Carolina does have a statewide nondiscrimination law, it does not include specific protections for LGBT people.

The HB2 law also directs all public schools, government agencies and public college campuses to require that multiple-occupancy bathrooms and changing facilities, such as locker rooms, be designated for use only by people based on their "biological sex" as stated on their birth certificates. Transgender people can use the bathrooms and changing facilities that correspond to their gender identities only if they get the biological sex on their birth certificates changed.

Lambda Legal, the ACLU, and the ACLU of North Carolina filed a lawsuit on March 28 challenging HB2, which includes limitations in protections for transgender people. The law bans people from using bathrooms that don't match the sex indicated on their birth certificate. That original filing was amended today to include Newell and Trent, according to the ACLU.

“Beverly and Kelly deserve to feel secure in knowing that when they go about their daily lives in Charlotte and interact with businesses open to the public, any discrimination they encounter is illegal. HB2 robs them of that,” Chris Brook, legal director of the ACLU of North Carolina, said in a statement today. “This law gives people the green light to discriminate against LGBT people and sends a daily message that LGBT people across the state are not worthy of dignity and respect.”

In its filing, the ACLU alleges that before HB2 passed, Newell and Trent would have been protected due to a Charlotte ordinance that expanded anti-discrimination protections to include LGBT people.

"HB2 has exposed them to discrimination based on sexual orientation," ACLU Senior Staff Attorney Elizabeth Gill told ABC News. "It was their experience that all of the discussion about HB2 and its effects was basically giving license to businesses in the state to discriminate. They did experience discrimination and are worried it would happen again."

A third plaintiff, a transgender teen, was also added to the lawsuit today.

More and more businesses and celebrities have publicly voiced their pleas to McCrory and state lawmakers to repeal HB2 in recent weeks.

Over 160 CEOs and business leaders signed an open letter with the Human Rights Campaign and Equality North Carolina earlier this month, urging the bill's repeal in the state's upcoming legislative session on Monday.

Additionally, the chambers of commerce for greater Raleigh and greater Durham, two of North Carolina's biggest cities, have called for HB2's repeal. And NBA Commissioner Adam Silver said today the league has made contingency plans for the 2017 All-Star Game, though it has not set a deadline to decide whether it will be in Charlotte.

Again, you're talking about state laws. The POTUS does not decide everything on his own in a totalitarian fashion. Well, except for Obama.

Instead of posting an article and leaving me to read it, why don't you state your points apropos the article and engage the discussion that you intend to engage? What are your points in regard to this article and what are you asking of me?

 

[Anonymous]

For a guy talking about trustworthiness he seems to say a lot of absolutes that he says later are only suggestions. If they're suggestions and meant to be only suggestions he should phrase them as such at the time or he just looks like he has no point or position. I made the point about inheritance since you left that part out of your claim about him turning one million into his current fortune making your statement incorrect. His father made a fortune while he took a fortune and made it Anger which is not as difficult. Three hundred million is a nice inheritance. As for the "bathroom law you asked for a source so I just gave u one". Here's another article for you to read about trumps beautiful energy speech. My point is that Clinton is the best choice out of the remaining three for the economy and equality as she's more of a centrist and not a factionalism and will continue obamas successful policies he's been forced to enact with executive action as congress, run by republicans who have been in session less than any congress in like twenty five years. She is proposing hard truths and realistic policies. She didn't lie to West Virginia and tell them coal is going to make a comeback and be stronger than ever she told the, the truth and that new energy sources are coming and will be there to stay for the foreseeable future. She's not proposing a tax plan like sanders that will never get passed or that state college will be free for all. Lying to people to get elected is wrong and a waste of money and time. Also federal law trumps state law which includes discrimination against lesbians trying to conceive. Here's your candidate embarrassing himself on his energy plan. To sum up you claimed that blacks and women would be better off voting for trump because of job creation and put his own career, though you left put an important bit, as proof that he could accomplish this and for the reasons above along with many more, some in this article below about his energy plan, that's hooey. Clinton is the best choice because she not saying anything to get elected and has proposals that stand a chance of getting passed by congress and will continue the policies already I stated by Obama that have already done a bunch of good like the over time rule just passed or the Aca which only twenty percent of americans want repealed with nothing to replace it and has helped the uninsured rate hate an all time record low.

 

[Anonymous]

Trumps embarrassing energy speech

Donald Trump's speech this week at a petroleum conference in North Dakota showcased the energy policies we can expect from a Trump administration. But more importantly, itrevealed a great deal about how Trump will develop and manage policy.

Pretty much everything it revealed was terrifying.

Most of what you need to know about the content of Trump's speech you can find in Brad Plumer's post about it. Suffice to say, it was nonsense, filled with basic errors and promises that cannot conceivably be kept.

What struck me was something else. Before the speech, there was some discussion of whether Trump would use a teleprompter instead of relying on his typical rambling improvisations. He did end up using one — "to keep him on message," says Reuters — but the effect ended up being bizarre.

Two things were evident throughout what was clearly intended by the campaign to be a Major Speech, showing Trump as a Serious Man.

The first is that Trump loves his rambling improvisations, and so does his audience, so he can scarcely be restrained from indulging in them. Time after time he would slip off script, tossing in a line about his border wall, his lead in the polls, Hillary Clinton's intention to "abolish the Second Amendment," or farmers. (He loves farmers.)

The second is that Trump was encountering his own speech, if not for the first time, then something close to it. The difference in tone and affect between the parts he read and the parts he freestyled was almost comical. He would squint at the teleprompter for a moment, read a fully formed English sentence with correct grammar and multisyllabic words ... and then grin, look out at the audience, and fire off a few hortatory exclamations.

What made this effect particularly disconcerting is that many of Trump's spontaneous interjections were reactions to his own speech.

[squint] "American energy dominance will be declared a strategic, economic, and foreign policy goal of the United States." [grin] "About time!"

It happened again and again. He'd read some statistic about the Environmental Protection Agency and then interject, "Wow, can you believe that?"

It was as though he was discovering Donald Trump's energy policies alongside his audience, and he liked what he saw. Oh, look here, Donald Trump is going to cancel the Paris climate accord, that's great!

It was amusingly Trumpian — Donald Trump often expresses admiration for things Donald Trump does or owns — but it was also revealing of some of his less commented-upon but more unsettling qualities.

Most attention on Trump has focused on his policy obsessions: immigration, trade, and renegotiating deals of all kinds. But the fact is Trump's obsessions are relatively few. In policy areas outside his fixations, he's been perfectly willing to rely on the counsel of the "best people," for whom he believes he has a unique eye.

In reality, Trump's choice of advisers, both formal and informal, has been a parade of extremists and unsavories. His hyper-regressive tax policy was co-written by Steven Moore and Larry Kudlow, two of the more clownish figures in conservative economics. His foreign policy advisers include Walid Phares, who has accused members of the Obama administration of "partnering with the Muslim Brotherhood," and Joseph Schmitz, who co-authored a 2010 report called "Shariah: The Threat to America."

Trump's eye for people is disastrously bad. Which brings us to the single scariest thing about him, something Vox's own Ezra Klein has stressed: his bottomless gullibility.

This is a guy who believed that a protestor who rushed his stage was a member of ISIS and that Ted Cruz's father was involved in the Kennedy assassination. He prizes his relationship with nutbag conspiracy theorist Alex Jones. He retweeted a Mussolini quote. He hired a doctor who wrote on his physical exam, "If elected, Mr. Trump, I can state unequivocally, will be the healthiest individual ever elected to the presidency."

To complement his terrible eye for people, he has a terrifying lack of skepticism toward what they tell him.

All of that was on display in his energy speech. He picked as an energy adviserKevin Cramer, a random junior member of the House of Representatives from North Dakota whose views are even more nakedly pro–fossil fuel than the Republican mainstream. By all accounts, with help from a mysterious second adviser "who asked not to be identified" (maybe oil baron Harold Hamm?), Cramer's ideas were mainlined into the speech.

Could Cramer and Adviser No. 2 have composed the entire thing? It wouldn't surprise me. The written version sounds nothing at all like Trump's natural voice, which likely contributed to the split-personality delivery.

To all appearances, Trump was happy that someone else had done his homework. He could barely bring himself to stay on script and read the speech — imagine actually having to, y'know, think of policy and write it down. That's grunt work.

After all, as his top adviser, Paul Manafort, said in an interview with the Huffington Post the other day, "He sees himself more as the chairman of the board, than even the CEO, let alone the COO." He takes more of a ... supervisory role.

So he picked a hyper-conservative Congress member and let that Congress member sweat the details. The result is harsh and uncompromising energy policy, explicitly pro–fossil fuel and anti-wind and solar, appealing only to the right wing of the right wing, weak in terms of both substance and general election politics. But whatever, at least the homework is done.

What will Trump's chairman-of-the-board lack of interest in details — and susceptibility to hucksters and extremists — look like when and if he becomes leader of the free world? We have somewhat of a precedent for this, in the presidency of one George W. Bush.

Bush was legendarily incurious about the nuts and bolts of how his administration ran. He did not have a strong grasp on the levers of power or the details of policy.

As a result, he was shaped by the people around him — Cheney, Rumsfeld, and the rest of the old-school, industry-friendly, warmongering GOP establishment. Energy policy guidance, for instance, was in many cases literallywritten by fossil fuel lobbyists. Whether Bush was a full-on "puppet," as the left is prone to thinking, or merely malleable, the result was that in areas outside his personal interest (which was most areas), he followed his advisers.

Trump is even less curious, even more uninterested in the details, than Bush. In areas outside of immigration and trade — as with energy — he too would turn policy over to advisers.

Those advisers would either look like the dysfunctional circus he's assembled around him so far or (as Republicans hope) like the GOP establishment. The result would either be lunacy or (best-case scenario!) merely the corruption and extremism of the Bush years.

I can just see it: Trump in the Oval Office, reading a speech from his teleprompter, reacting to it in real time.

"So we have no choice but to declare martial law ... oh, hey, martial law, about time!"

 

[Layne]

For a guy talking about trustworthiness he seems to say a lot of absolutes that he says later are only suggestions. If they're suggestions and meant to be only suggestions he should phrase them as such at the time or he just looks like he has no point or position. I made the point about inheritance since you left that part out of your claim about him turning one million into his current fortune making your statement incorrect. His father made a fortune while he took a fortune and made it Anger which is not as difficult. Three hundred million is a nice inheritance. As for the "bathroom law you asked for a source so I just gave u one". Here's another article for you to read about trumps beautiful energy speech. My point is that Clinton is the best choice out of the remaining three for the economy and equality as she's more of a centrist and not a factionalism and will continue obamas successful policies he's been forced to enact with executive action as congress, run by republicans who have been in session less than any congress in like twenty five years. She is proposing hard truths and realistic policies. She didn't lie to West Virginia and tell them coal is going to make a comeback and be stronger than ever she told the, the truth and that new energy sources are coming and will be there to stay for the foreseeable future. She's not proposing a tax plan like sanders that will never get passed or that state college will be free for all. Lying to people to get elected is wrong and a waste of money and time. Also federal law trumps state law which includes discrimination against lesbians trying to conceive. Here's your candidate embarrassing himself on his energy plan. To sum up you claimed that blacks and women would be better off voting for trump because of job creation and put his own career, though you left put an important bit, as proof that he could accomplish this and for the reasons above along with many more, some in this article below about his energy plan, that's hooey. Clinton is the best choice because she not saying anything to get elected and has proposals that stand a chance of getting passed by congress and will continue the policies already I stated by Obama that have already done a bunch of good like the over time rule just passed or the Aca which only twenty percent of americans want repealed with nothing to replace it and has helped the uninsured rate hate an all time record low.

Obama has been a disaster. Obama 2.0 will be a similar disaster. You really think things are great with the status quo? You're nuts.

I'm not going to address someone else's opinion piece that you posted below. Sometimes you need to speak for yourself rather than just letting others fill your mouth.

 

[Anonymous]

Record low uninsured rates are a disaster. The end of arbitration is a disaster. The justice department investigating further police forces a disaster. Employment up from a record recession disaster. More overtime pay for working people a disaster. The rule helping stop workers being labeled as to contract employees but government employees. His efforts in clemency. This is just what he's accomplished with executive action mainly as Congress has been nothing but obstructive to My action that could help people. They just went on vacation before even securing money to stop zika before it spreads here despite his administration's effect efforts to stop ebolA. His appointments go the supreme Court have also been wonderful in There support of unions and reproductive rights as well as being a woman which was mjch needed on that court and an under represented minority as Trump berates the judge presiding over his Trump university case for being Mexican. He also did Friday that there was no drought in california. Hell say anything to anyone to get a vote. To a lesser degree I think Sanders will as well