A
Anonymous
Guest
Btw, the silhouette in that Sun article is of Kevin Spacey, from a photo very similar to this one https://www.wmagazine.com/story/kevin-spacey-let-me-be-frank-youtube-video
Well, up to a point. But surely people have the right to use a public toilet without being unexpectedly manhandled by others. To me, that's a bit more than a pass. And God knows, he made enough of a fuss about it when something similar happened to him at LAX.Why? If it’s him he made a pass at someone, the pass was rebuffed and he stropped off to his room. If i hear that he attempted to aggressively force himself on someone with corroborating evideythen yes that’s serious.
I saw that, FWD, but I think it's supposed to be the silhouette of the victim?I wouldn't panic just yet.
Someone should tell the other media they're looking for the wrong silhouette.
Mirror:View attachment 47763
Mail:
View attachment 47761
Oh, and just one more thing...
FWD.
I saw that, FWD, but I think it's supposed to be the silhouette of the victim?
You're almost certainly correct. That's put a different spin on it.Btw, the silhouette in that Sun article is of Kevin Spacey, from a photo very similar to this one https://www.wmagazine.com/story/kevin-spacey-let-me-be-frank-youtube-video
You're almost certainly correct. That's put a different spin on it.
My point was that people were leaping ahead because of the silhouette, which we can now see is almost certainly not him. But thanks for the info.Spacey isn't a 'music legend'
My point was that people were leaping ahead because of the silhouette, which we can now see is almost certainly not him. But thanks for the info.
Well, it still doesn't mean it's not him. But it removes the assumption that 'it must be because he looks like the silhouette'. Plus, there is the small matter of the 'household name' which - even allowing for Sun journalism - is stretching it a bit, I feel.I did breath a sigh of relief when I saw that. The hair never quite looked right and it does look an almost perfect fit for Spacey. Quite poor of them to use a misleading picture/silhouette, but then it is the Sun for you.
Well, it still doesn't mean it's not him. But it removes the assumption that 'it must be because he looks like the silhouette'. Plus, there is the small matter of the 'household name' which - even allowing for Sun journalism - is stretching it a bit, I feel.