omg Jamie Lynn Spears is pregnant!
- Thread starter mell
- Start date
mell
loves moz
Yes, Britney's younger sis is the star of a show for kids/teens on Nickelodeon. Wholesome family entertainment really is a thing of the past.
D
Deleted member 4260
Guest
HAHAHAHA
stupid girl.....
No, I take that back..STUPID MOTHER....First she throws Brit-Brit into the fire when she was young, doesn't seem to help her lately with her issues and now lets her 16 shack up with a 19 year old...
stupid skag...
stupid girl.....
No, I take that back..STUPID MOTHER....First she throws Brit-Brit into the fire when she was young, doesn't seem to help her lately with her issues and now lets her 16 shack up with a 19 year old...
stupid skag...
Buzzetta
WOOOOOOOO!!!!!
Well look at the bright side. We know that the kid will be in no danger of being improperly fastened with a seatbelt in a car since Jamie is too young to drive. On top of that I think the whole experience will be cute for Brittney's and Jamie's kids. The cousins can be neglected together.
Aside: I am so going to hell.
Aside: I am so going to hell.
D
Dave
Guest
They should all be fed to alligators. Make a Pepsi commercial out of it and play it during the Super Bowl.
Buzzetta
WOOOOOOOO!!!!!
I'd watch that. I was just about to go to bed... then I saw that you logged on. Now I have someone to be sarcastic with since NRITH took the night off.
Corrissey
lovable loser
D
Deleted member 4260
Guest
dude I'm not even sure Britney's kids are still alive
awww..lol..those poor kids..
You do have to admit they are supercute!!!
mell
loves moz
That little girl from Whale Rider was the same age when she got knocked up
http://www.people.com/people/article/0,26334,1543222,00.html
(But at least she already had an Oscar nomination under her belt by the time she f***ed up!)
http://www.people.com/people/article/0,26334,1543222,00.html
(But at least she already had an Oscar nomination under her belt by the time she f***ed up!)
Corrissey
lovable loser
No way! Give me Shiloh or Suri anyday!
That little girl from Whale Rider was the same age when she got knocked up
http://www.people.com/people/article/0,26334,1543222,00.html
(But at least she already had an Oscar nomination under her belt by the time she f***ed up!)
One of my fave movies. Paikea's cool with me
D
Dave
Guest
Hey Buzzetta, I went to the store. Yeah, I guess NRITH thinks he can slack now that he has made the 4,000 mark!
PregnantForTheLastTime
Hideous trait.
We've lost our boy? Whatever can have happened to him?
Corrissey
lovable loser
Buzzetta
WOOOOOOOO!!!!!
I don't know. Preggers how was the hangover this morning?
D
Dave
Guest
I put in average age to marry 1850, just picking that date at random.
The story we see here is that in 1890 men waited until the relatively old age of 26.1 years before getting married -- perhaps representing the time at which they could acquire some land and support a family, and they married substantially younger women -- 22 years old on average. Over time, growing prosperity led the first marriage age for men to drop steadily and substantially to 22.8 in both the 1950 and 1960 snapshots. At the same time, women's age at first marriage declined steadily and slightly to 20.3, giving us the "traditional" (i.e., postwar) family.
At this point, the trends reverse and average age at first marriage rises steadily. By 1980, women are getting married at the 1890 age again, though men are still getting married younger than their 1890s counterparts. By 1990, however, 1890 marriage ages are back in style for men, and women are getting married later than their 1890s counterparts. By 2000, at 26.8 men are getting married slightly later than they did back in the way, but women at 25.1 years old are now getting married way than either midcentury or late 19th century women. From 2000-2003, ages continue to creep upwards for both genders, and after that I have no data.
*******************************************************
This is not what I thought. Somehow I thought that people used to marry at a younger age. I guess in the 1950's and 1960's they did.
The story we see here is that in 1890 men waited until the relatively old age of 26.1 years before getting married -- perhaps representing the time at which they could acquire some land and support a family, and they married substantially younger women -- 22 years old on average. Over time, growing prosperity led the first marriage age for men to drop steadily and substantially to 22.8 in both the 1950 and 1960 snapshots. At the same time, women's age at first marriage declined steadily and slightly to 20.3, giving us the "traditional" (i.e., postwar) family.
At this point, the trends reverse and average age at first marriage rises steadily. By 1980, women are getting married at the 1890 age again, though men are still getting married younger than their 1890s counterparts. By 1990, however, 1890 marriage ages are back in style for men, and women are getting married later than their 1890s counterparts. By 2000, at 26.8 men are getting married slightly later than they did back in the way, but women at 25.1 years old are now getting married way than either midcentury or late 19th century women. From 2000-2003, ages continue to creep upwards for both genders, and after that I have no data.
*******************************************************
This is not what I thought. Somehow I thought that people used to marry at a younger age. I guess in the 1950's and 1960's they did.
PregnantForTheLastTime
Hideous trait.
???
I'm fine, I've been working all night on two articles I have due just into the new year. Why?
D
Dave
Guest
have I killed two threads?
