dailyalice
Frink Squad Member
I've lost the link. There was a very cool 3-4 page bio of Moz on his US PR website. I printed it but an employee lost it. Does anyone remember where it is?
Thanks.
Thanks.
Moz bio on PR website
- Thread starter dailyalice
- Start date
Claudia2006
Banned
dailyalice
Frink Squad Member
Yes! Thank you!
(and just went to save it on my computer and found where I'd saved it before...silly me...)
(and just went to save it on my computer and found where I'd saved it before...silly me...)
Last edited:
Raphael Lambach
Well-Known Member
If I'm not wrong, this bio is old.. it was published last year - during YoR release.
dailyalice
Frink Squad Member
I know it's old...but it goes on.
I quite like it.
I quite like it.
Girl-with-the-Thorn
Still here.
I like it, and particularly agree with this:
"It seems particularly churlish to dismiss any new work just because it does not apparently express the old song’s particular, sudden urges and urgency. It seems ferociously judgemental – although weaned on Morrissey such discrimination would come easily - to decide that because Morrissey was once so fantastically, uncommonly expressive, he should now shut down, abdicate, permanently withdraw, or, as he would say, “go and live in Cheadle Hulme.”
Meanwhile, despite those that feel he has weakened, or lost focus, or been found out, he still possesses the same independent, unaccountable, self-created, precariously maintained vigour.
The new work is always as fascinating as the celebrated Smiths work and the favoured solo work because it springs, and seeps, from the age and places where that shamed and shaming original writer now finds himself, faced with the elaborate burden of his own legend and the hassle of his legacy."
"It seems particularly churlish to dismiss any new work just because it does not apparently express the old song’s particular, sudden urges and urgency. It seems ferociously judgemental – although weaned on Morrissey such discrimination would come easily - to decide that because Morrissey was once so fantastically, uncommonly expressive, he should now shut down, abdicate, permanently withdraw, or, as he would say, “go and live in Cheadle Hulme.”
Meanwhile, despite those that feel he has weakened, or lost focus, or been found out, he still possesses the same independent, unaccountable, self-created, precariously maintained vigour.
The new work is always as fascinating as the celebrated Smiths work and the favoured solo work because it springs, and seeps, from the age and places where that shamed and shaming original writer now finds himself, faced with the elaborate burden of his own legend and the hassle of his legacy."
Similar threads
