1. The Smiths as in Morrissey/Marr/Rourke/Joyce will never reform because Moz values blind loyalty over money.
2. If however the Smiths did reform, they'd be atrocious. They were a band of their time. They'd now be old men playing songs of a band of another time. Their own tribute act, as it were, unable to capture the ferocity of the original concept as that fire simply doesn't burn anymore. It was quenched by money for the two primary architects of the sound, years ago.
3. Moz believe that his current work/band is the greatest of his career. Why would he dump yes men who serve him and wear whatever he wants them to for 3 guys he believes have 'stabbed him in the back so many, many times.'
4. The hate for Moz on a site dedicated to him is for me down to one reason. The audience has changed AND he has changed. We the audience remember 'everyman Moz'. He is no longer him and we are no longer them. Millionaire Moz and Malibu Steve are not to our tastes. Moz was a millionaire before Vauxhall came out but we didn't have the internet to use as a public platform for our feelings that we've been let down at that time. We still bought the public image as witnessed and captured on the introducing Morrissey video. I was at Blackpool, my friend at Sheffield, neither of us have witnessed that before or since.
5. As a consequence Moz no longer speaks our lives and so his 'outspokenness' is less forgiven and overlooked by us.
6. Like anything and anyone, Moz is neither entirely right or entirely wrong with what he says. For example, do you go into a hotel room of an old fat pervy film producer expecting him to play dominos with you when you get there? If there is to be a meeting about a budding young career, why must that take place in a hotel room?
There can only be condemnation for abuse of any kind but there's no arguing that the victim places themselves in danger by being there.
The level of naivety required to think that a pervy actior/film producer/politician has no ulterior motive by inviting a young person into their room shows that they are not ready for the human race, nevermind a showbiz career.
By the laws of probability alone, some eventual victim WILL have gone into a hotel room originally looking to do what's required to progress their career and ended up not liking what they're asked to do. WHY can't that be acknowledged? Does it excuse the abuser? Obviously not.
But why be attacked for pointing out that not every scenario is a innocent lamb to the slaughter scenario in cases of sexual harassment?
I dunno.