Morrissey: I'd Kill Donald Trump for the 'Safety of Humanity' - Breitbart, NME, Washington Times

Morrissey: I'd Kill Donald Trump for the 'Safety of Humanity' - Breitbart
British musician Morrissey says if given the chance, he’d kill President Donald Trump to ensure the “safety of humanity.”

Also:
Morrissey says he would kill “vermin” Donald Trump “for the safety of humanity” - NME. Link from Rene.

Morrissey supports killing Donald Trump ‘for the safety of humanity’ - The Washington Times. Link
posted by Orson Swells
Singer blames ‘American media’ for having ‘created’ the president in the first place


Related item:
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
You're proving my exact point. If a right-winger said what you said and claimed that it was a joke, they would be hit even harder: "you're sick! How could you joke about genocide? You are evil!" I mean I've heard the script play out a million times.

More projection and hypocrisy lol.

Incidentally, everything Donald Trump says sparks outrage among leftist retards, even the genuinely funny things.

Nice try though. Still no cigar.

Ironic they would find KKK/Nationalist Socialist Workers Party Policy Positions as funny, high comedy.
WHEN THEY USE.
FFS how can he joke about genocide, specially when nothing the guy writes is remotely funny. "Inferior peoples" LOL Far out.:tears:
 

Vegan

Well-Known Member
Ironic they would find KKK/Nationalist Socialist Workers Party Policy Positions as funny, high comedy.
WHEN THEY USE.
FFS how can he joke about genocide, specially when nothing the guy writes is remotely funny. "Inferior peoples" LOL Far out.:tears:

Read the title of the thread you self-righteous, thin-skinned, easily-offended, bitchy manboy. Wait, you ARE TRUMP! This is the last time I'm going to explain it to you. It's called satire. If you don't get the humor it's because you are either a blithering idiot or dishonestly feigning outrage. This whole "us vs them", "right vs left" nonsense is just fodder for the simple-minded. It just obfuscates the real problems and divides the bots. You and Derelict17 need to think outside your little box of talking points for once. Nothing you've said. No tactic you've used is even remotely fresh. It's the same old b.s. found on every politically-charged forum on the web. And the cruelest irony is you accuse others of being close-minded. Or use the anti-PC routine. Your whole KKK/Socialist game is hilarious considering who white supremacists actually support. You know it's satire. But that's the tactic. Accuse them before and if they accuse you so the waters get muddy. Trump's team employed that to perfection. It's a little game that goes back to childhood if you may recall. It's "I know you are but what am I?".

You both are Low In Preschool.

Here's one for you cowardly anon :crazy:
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Read the title of the thr

ead you self-righteous, thin-skinned, easily-offended, bitchy manboy. Wait, you ARE TRUMP! This is the last time I'm going to explain it to you. It's called satire. If you don't get the humor it's because you are either a blithering idiot or dishonestly feigning outrage. This whole "us vs them", "right vs left" nonsense is just fodder for the simple-minded. It just obfuscates the real problems and divides the bots. You and Derelict17 need to think outside your little box of talking points for once. You've both fallen right into the trap. Nothing you've said. No tactic you've used is even remotely fresh. It's the same old b.s. found on every politically-charged domain on the web. And the cruelest irony is you accuse others of being close-minded. Or use the anti-PC routine. Your whole KKK/Socialist game is hilarious considering who white supremacists actually support. You know it's satire. But that's the tactic. Accuse them before and if they accuse you so the waters get muddy. Trump's team employed that to perfection. It's a little game that goes back to childhood if you may recall. It's "I know you are but what am I?".

You both are Low In Preschool.

Here's one for you cowardly anon :crazy:



LOL that was hilarious. :crazy: (NOT)
( I dont know what the title thread has to do with the culling of the gene pool for the removal of mutations and 'inferior people" WTF?)
If 'thinking outside the box' entails the adoption of KKK/Nazi propaganda, I pass.:rolleyes:
 

Vegan

Well-Known Member
LOL that was hilarious. :crazy: (NOT)
( I dont know what the title thread has to do with the culling of the gene pool for the removal of mutations and 'inferior people" WTF?)
If 'thinking outside the box' entails the adoption of KKK/Nazi propaganda, I pass.:rolleyes:

That's because you are as dumb as dried dung. I'll explain it to you and then I'm done wasting my time on you wee keyboard warrior. Moz would kill Trump for the "sake of humanity". I joked I would take it a step further. I'm not surprised you can't grasp it. I'm also not surprised you are feigning offense. It's all you have at this point. :sleeping:
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Here is what you said:

'People like this cowardly "Anonymous" are what's wrong with the world. I'm vegan but I think we need to cull the human species to eliminate these pernicious mutations from the evolving human gene pool.'


It had nothing to do with Trump. Your KKK/Nazi tentacles just burst out. Then later you couldnt help yourself and brought up the 'inferior people' much like:


 

Derek17

Well-Known Member
A lot of nuttiness there Derek. That reads as everything right wingers do that's wrong is a result of left wingers. I thought you guys were all into taking personal responsibility?

Your mistake here is taking far lefties and using their views to justify your own. It doesn't work like that, take a view on what's right, if you don't you're wrong, wherever you sit on the political spectrum.

If you want to question parts of Islam knock yourself out, but if you're going to start down they're culturally going to rape or molest kids then you've lost the plot.

Who is "you guys?" I'm not a conservative.

I don't think I actually declared any views. I am not using leftist views to justify my own; I am only pointing out the problems with the left-right political dynamic at present.

OK, fair enough about Islam generally. But why is it considered to be wrong—even Islamophobic and evil—to point out instances of violence by Muslims against, say, white British females, but it is encouraged to point out instances of violence by, say, white males, against, say, anyone, including Muslims? I condemn all violence, of course, but I cannot understand how any logical, open minded people could support such double standards, yet it happens among many on the left. Why?
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
I think I can easily answer the top part>
"you guys'(also known as 'you people") are those peeps in the need of 'culling' out of the gene pool due to their mutant status.o_O
 

Derek17

Well-Known Member
Here is what you said:

'People like this cowardly "Anonymous" are what's wrong with the world. I'm vegan but I think we need to cull the human species to eliminate these pernicious mutations from the evolving human gene pool.'


It had nothing to do with Trump. Your KKK/Nazi tentacles just burst out. Then later you couldnt help yourself and brought up the 'inferior people' much like:


#Exposed
 

Derek17

Well-Known Member
That's because you are as dumb as dried dung. I'll explain it to you and then I'm done wasting my time on you wee keyboard warrior. Moz would kill Trump for the "sake of humanity". I joked I would take it a step further. I'm not surprised you can't grasp it. I'm also not surprised you are feigning offense. It's all you have at this point. :sleeping:

So your joke about committing genocide is OK but if I said it it wouldn't be OK... why, exactly? I'm confused!
 

Vegan

Well-Known Member
So your joke about committing genocide is OK but if I said it it wouldn't be OK... why, exactly? I'm confused!

When did I claim such? Are you confusing me with a different user? I don't believe in double standards. I'm a fan of satire. Joke away. Almost anything can be joked about depending on the situation and context.
 

Derek17

Well-Known Member
When did I claim such? Are you confusing me with a different user? I don't believe in double standards. I'm a fan of satire. Joke away. Almost anything can be joked about depending on the situation and context.

"People like this cowardly 'Anonymous' are what's wrong with the world. I'm vegan but I think we need to cull the human species to eliminate these pernicious mutations from the evolving human gene pool."

I am appalled. You are literally Hitler.
 

Vegan

Well-Known Member
It had nothing to do with Trump. Your KKK/Nazi tentacles just burst out. Then later you couldnt help yourself and brought up the 'inferior people' much like:


You do realize Dr Strangelove is A COMEDY, no? Oh I get it now. No wonder you chose this example. You have no sense of humor.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Godwin LAW:crazy:


what does godwin law have to say about peeps that want the 'cull the gene pool for human mutations and the eliminate' such mutations? Or about peeps that rant about 'inferior people'? would it be applicable LOL

Wasnt Adolf himself a vegan!!!!! FFS:straightface:
 

Charlie Cheswick

Well-Known Member
Who is "you guys?" I'm not a conservative.

I don't think I actually declared any views. I am not using leftist views to justify my own; I am only pointing out the problems with the left-right political dynamic at present.

OK, fair enough about Islam generally. But why is it considered to be wrong—even Islamophobic and evil—to point out instances of violence by Muslims against, say, white British females, but it is encouraged to point out instances of violence by, say, white males, against, say, anyone, including Muslims? I condemn all violence, of course, but I cannot understand how any logical, open minded people could support such double standards, yet it happens among many on the left. Why?

Why are you classifying crime by race or religion? Have you got a crime chart in front of you that is showing skewed figures by Muslims?

I'm not sure about having women covered from head to toe, halal, attitudes to gay people, etc. Mind, are western practices any better than halal?

You can question what you like, just keep it factual instead of spurious - such as talking about Muslim violence towards white British females or talking about rape capitals - unless you've got figures to back those claims up. On the politics group I go on the right wingers on there (Libertarians) are as dismissive of this stuff as anyone on the left. It isn't a left right thing, it's just about being opposed to petty racism up to far worse.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Why are you classifying crime by race or religion? Have you got a crime chart in front of you that is showing skewed figures by Muslims?

I'm not sure about having women covered from head to toe, halal, attitudes to gay people, etc. Mind, are western practices any better than halal?

You can question what you like, just keep it factual instead of spurious - such as talking about Muslim violence towards white British females or talking about rape capitals - unless you've got figures to back those claims up. On the politics group I go on the right wingers on there (Libertarians) are as dismissive of this stuff as anyone on the left. It isn't a left right thing, it's just about being opposed to petty racism up to far worse.

WTF? You need to re write this in a manner consistent with coherency.

Dr. Abd al-Aziz Fawazan al-Fawzan, a professor of Islamic law said that "if a woman gets raped walking in public alone, then she, herself is at fault. She is only seducing men by her presence. She should have stayed at home like a Muslim woman."

One of the world's most respected Sunni scholars, Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, told an audience on his al-Jazeera television show in 2004 that "to be absolved from guilt, the raped woman must have shown some sort of good conduct."

Unlike liberals or conservatives, Libertarians advocate a high degree of both personal and economic liberty. Libertarians advocate freedom in economic matters, so we're in favor of lowering and eliminating taxes, slashing bureaucratic regulation of business, and charitable — rather than government — welfare.

also you should consider going light on the misinformation.:rolleyes:


 

Derek17

Well-Known Member
Why are you classifying crime by race or religion? Have you got a crime chart in front of you that is showing skewed figures by Muslims?

I'm not sure about having women covered from head to toe, halal, attitudes to gay people, etc. Mind, are western practices any better than halal?

You can question what you like, just keep it factual instead of spurious - such as talking about Muslim violence towards white British females or talking about rape capitals - unless you've got figures to back those claims up. On the politics group I go on the right wingers on there (Libertarians) are as dismissive of this stuff as anyone on the left. It isn't a left right thing, it's just about being opposed to petty racism up to far worse.

As far as why crime is relevant with regard to religion here, it only is because the crimes are potentially linked to the religious practices of certain individuals based on their ideology, not their identity.

The thing is, this whole thing is new in terms of the scope of the migration that is occurring, particularly with regard to bringing in mass numbers of heavily religious people who have very different beliefs from those of Western countries. I mean, we hear complaints all the time from the left about sexism, homophobia, transphobia, etc. and yet simultaneously they support the mass introduction of people who tend to hold views about women that have not been reflective of our society for, well, ever really, but for the sake of debate, centuries for sure. I mean, go to Turkey and ask people on the street what they think of homosexuals and Jews. Why are feminists OK with a potential regression to more patriarchal ways? This is a fair question, but one that is also considered to be Islamophobic by many feminists. Go figure.

The truth is though that what is happening in many European countries is highly experimental, and as such, the long-term societal effects are not clear. There are legitimate concerns that eventually we will not be able to dismiss. For example, it is yet to be seen how attitudes toward homosexuality might shift in Sweden, for instance, if the population was to rise to, say, 30, 40, or 50+ percent Muslim. We simply don't know what will happen, but there are definitely potential major implications that we can predict logically.

It's all so pointless, really. Japan has avoided many of the problems that Europe is dealing with by being smart and logical with regard to its own interests. There is nothing wrong with every country operating with that mindset as far as I'm concerned.
 

Trending Threads

Top Bottom