The thread was intended to be about Tracy Morgan, yes. It then ceased to be--after the first post. (You don't notice that? Odd.) It became about Dave's stalker site, for several pages. He was then banned because of what was discussed in the thread, apparently.
You were a part of that site, using it to accuse NRITH of molesting his daughter (by posting a picture of the two of them that you'd found and commenting, "
I bet he's f***ing her hard right there," or something like that. You can say this is inaccurate because I haven't gotten it correct verbatim, perhaps? That's your style.)
Anyone can indeed, as you say, follow the link and see this for themselves.
http://goo.gl/2U14s
Not to mention, how can you confuse a statue resembling a dead infant, posted in reply to a reference to a miscarriage, with a
random picture that has
nothing at all to do with said miscarriage reference?
It takes a special kind of liar to ask people to do that.
You evidently did. Anyone can, again, follow the link and see that.
http://goo.gl/2U14s
Other people can confirm "the reason" you posted what you did? As for your girlfriend and your obsessed fan, Skylarker, being willing to back you up, when the former was a party to what we're talking about--what a shock! As for DavidT being willing to back you up, about what you knew and how you knew it--how the hell would THAT work? Mindreading? Polygraph?
I like that you can pretend not to know who Chico was. Since he was one of the people Dave's troll site was most obsessed with--and since you posted there, under the name you're using now--you certainly do know. Dave asked you to make those posts in the Tracy Morgan thread, I think, and you asked your troll groupie girlfriend to play along. Just a theory. Doesn't matter if it's correct. The fact is, you worked to obtain users' names and other personal details, and you used it to harass them. About a miscarriage, in this case. About supposed incest and child molestation, in the case of NRITH, the use of whose name in forum posts you have written you consider "fair game."
http://www.morrissey-solo.com/threads/115318-Viva-Hate!?p=1986649056&viewfull=1#post1986649056
That says everything anyone needs to know about your motives here. This isn't the only time you've flaunted knowledge of someone's name, either, in an attempt to harass.
Also: being "flirty and silly," about a miscarriage?
You're on about someone else now, unless you're simply making that up. As for talk of
your being stalked... Boo-hoo?
But here's why you'll get away with it yet again, probably, and why you and Dave got away with so much for so long: Chico is not going to return to the site to say, "Yes, this is correct." People are not going to post, "Yes, that's my real name," "Yes, that's the name of my girlfriend," "Yes, we had a miscarriage," "Yes, that tag is about my drug problem," "Yes, that's a photo of my daughter on your troll site, with a caption saying I'm molesting her"... This is always your ace in the hole. Dave and you and the rest who were stalking everyone have too much personal information about Chico, and he doesn't want it aired, and he knows you'll air it. People leave--sane people--when someone like you pushes things that far.
Dave himself could also confirm some of this, but you have too much you're willing to unload about him, too, as he explained in the following post. And of course he's banned, seemingly fallen on his sword to save the whole let's-stalk-everybody-who-makes-more-posts-than-we-do-and-hence-gets-more-attention gang you were a part of.
http://www.morrissey-solo.com/threa...-Dress?p=1986648606&viewfull=1#post1986648606
As Dave wrote to you: "That is far from the most interesting thing you know about me but I'm not trying to play any dare games. I had everything about me discovered and a whole lot more made up so a reference to having a job at a place that sells shoddy crap is not worthy of you, and
I respectfully ask you not show me what you could do instead if you put a mind to it."
You certainly didn't argue with him.
You're a troll and a stalker and you're generally pretty pleased to have people know it, it seems. You also told the forum their friend Kuiper had died because he was ignoring you, submitted false stories to the main page at least twice... You're pretending to be above malicious behavior, now? As Skylarker wrote about you: "I should have learned my lesson a few years ago when he f***ed me over the first time, forming a "friendship" with me online
so that he could procure information from me about certain individuals that I had and he wanted... This guy is manipulative, two-faced, and totally destructive. Do not trust him. Be very careful what you say to him, especially in private messages.
He will forward your emails, manipulate your words, skew contexts, and play you against other people if he feels something can be gained from it... Bottom line with this guy: if he sees you as harmless, you're fine. But if he sees you as a threat, or if he can get something out of you, he will go out of his way to bring you down...
He recently sent me (unsolicited) a picture of a longterm female member's breasts that he had gotten (unbeknownst to the member) from her flickr account, bragging to me about his ability to do this, and telling me that he saw her as a threat because he perceived "that she did not like him." He planned to post this picture publicly in the event she caused him any significant grief... I'm on the verge of getting banned here (he's also been manipulating the site admin against me) so I have little to lose by posting this; it'll be my last post... Watch out for this guy. He's f***ed up...and not "interesting" f***ed up...just plain f***ed up."
(You did say he could vouch for you, right?)
You're right. I shouldn't have. But I associate you with these people because of the similarity between your behavior and theirs. You have repeatedly attempted to intimidate people into leaving this site. You have usually succeeded, because the moderators allowed you to do as you liked while simultaneously raising the standard of behavior for those you harassed. The pattern is always the same: those who were persecuted into leaving had criticized the moderators and/or the administrator. People such as !Viva Hate! have discerned this pattern and exploited it.
I'm complaining about how this site betrays the trust of its users. People who openly boast of or indicate that they're stalkers become mod/admin pets, while others are banned for telling jokes about hookers, quoting Morrissey on Morrissey, quoting another user, reporting troll posts... It's remarkable, that's all. If I were actually trying to have anyone banned (the only thing you're worried about), I would have omitted all criticism of DavidT and the moderators from this post. I don't care who's banned.
What's there to believe or disbelieve? All that's necessary is the ability to click a link and read a few posts.
http://goo.gl/2U14s
So, !Viva Hate! has posted pictures of mentally retarded people and AIDS patients as jokes (a search for the word "AIDS" in his posts actually turns up
two pages worth of results), and mocked your own child who has cystic fibrosis--but you think he draws the line at miscarriage?
Consistency. You might want to look into it.
