Yeah, you can't afford to be wasting time, get back to your Ladybird Book of the Law, now you've found out what libel means, you can move on and find another legal term to explain on a forum for no necessary reason. You're thick as pigshit because you can't follow the simplest argument laid out to you in the most basic terms:
1. Haslam is implying he has the dirt on Morrissey and could destroy his career by revealing what he knows in a few tweets.
2. Does he have evidence to support any allegations he makes? If he doesn't, then he's talking through his arse when he claims he's going to destroy Morrissey's career in a few tweets, because we all know he won't do it - Morrissey would sue his butt.
But hey, wade in again with your dumb ass, 'Things I Learnt Today in My Ladybird Book of Law' argument, and point out that something can be true eve if there's no evidence for it - like that's got anything to f***ing do with with the above points. I understand what you're saying, I understand that what you're saying has no absolutely relevance, and I understand that you're a complete f***ing moron.
