Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Radis Noir" data-source="post: 1987337628" data-attributes="member: 29235">No, he wasn't. You see, this speaks to what was being discussed yesterday, your constant trolling. You could simply have commented on the Diana story and that would have been fine. But no, you have to put in what is basically a lie about Bashir being a 'darling of the left' presumably to smear 'the left' (whomsoever they may be) and try to politicise what is essentially a non-political story. The other thing to realise is that if you make a nonsensical claim or assertion to smear a person or group, you will likely be called out on it and asked to prove it. It has nothing to do with what you were asking me to do yesterday - I told you where you could find the answer to your question and you couldn't be bothered to go and look. It's a fundamental part of debating - if you base an argument on a falsehood then revealing that falsehood will render your argument invalid.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Radis Noir, post: 1987337628, member: 29235"] No, he wasn't. You see, this speaks to what was being discussed yesterday, your constant trolling. You could simply have commented on the Diana story and that would have been fine. But no, you have to put in what is basically a lie about Bashir being a 'darling of the left' presumably to smear 'the left' (whomsoever they may be) and try to politicise what is essentially a non-political story. The other thing to realise is that if you make a nonsensical claim or assertion to smear a person or group, you will likely be called out on it and asked to prove it. It has nothing to do with what you were asking me to do yesterday - I told you where you could find the answer to your question and you couldn't be bothered to go and look. It's a fundamental part of debating - if you base an argument on a falsehood then revealing that falsehood will render your argument invalid. [/QUOTE]

Name

Verification