The Jew-hating in the above post is another indicator that Truth and the Holocaust denier are also the same person lol. Called it.
It’s not about politics
- Thread starter Layne
- Start date
The Jew-hating in the above post is another indicator that Truth and the Holocaust denier are also the same person lol. Called it.
Exactly. Methinks one has more cards to play than the other.
G
Gimme Some Truth
Guest
Derek the coward, forcing me to repeat myself (taken from last night's post):
[...]
"Now Derek, tell me, who largely runs Hollywood? Okay that's unfair, I remember seeing a report from a Jewish screenwriter, Ben Stein, who conducted a study and found that Hollywood is *only* 60% run by an ethnic group that comprises 2% of the US population, which obviously completely debunked the notion of Hollywood being 'run' by any particular group. And Arabs controlling 60% of the media in Israel wouldn't be a cause of concern for Israelis either, would it, because it's unlikely that they would use that power to push their own interests, by being able to influence what Israelis think through what they see and read. Of course they wouldn't.
At least Arabs make up 20% of Israel's population so their overrepresentation in high ranking positions in Israel's media wouldn't be as curious as if those positions were occupied by members of an ethnic group who comprised only a tiny fraction of Israel's overall population, like the Druze. But you don't want to talk about that, you'd rather focus on topics for which there is no, or very little, real evidence.
"But there's no non-evidence either."
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/amp/arts/film/who-controls-hollywood/article19670867/ "
Or maybe @bhops could say something about this instead if you don't have the brainpower to do so yourself, Derek. If you're willing to believe bullshit like Q, surely you wouldn't overlook actual evidence of something when it's presented to you? Unless you have a good reason not to do so --- which is what, exactly? Ancestral ties? It's certainly not to protect your reputation, since you're already the laughing stock of morrissey-solo.com, no offence intended
, and I doubt you're delusional enough to think that people appreciate your contributions to this website which they find reliable and informative. Well, maybe you are that delusional. You've already set a precedent, I just don't know how low into delusionality you can sink.
G
Gimme Some Truth
Guest
I'm sure you've seen this Rowan Atkinson speech in which he explains the paradox of "the paradox of tolerance".
If not, here ya go:
V
vegan.cro spirit# 112
Guest
You dont really have to be tolerant to be tolerant of those who are in your group think tank.
V
vegan.cro spirit# 112
Guest
Derek the coward, forcing me to repeat myself (taken from last night's post):
[...]
"Now Derek, tell me, who largely runs Hollywood? Okay that's unfair, I remember seeing a report from a Jewish screenwriter, Ben Stein, who conducted a study and found that Hollywood is *only* 60% run by an ethnic group that comprises 2% of the US population, which obviously completely debunked the notion of Hollywood being 'run' by any particular group. And Arabs controlling 60% of the media in Israel wouldn't be a cause of concern for Israelis either, would it, because it's unlikely that they would use that power to push their own interests, by being able to influence what Israelis think through what they see and read. Of course they wouldn't.
At least Arabs make up 20% of Israel's population so their overrepresentation in high ranking positions in Israel's media wouldn't be as curious as if those positions were occupied by members of an ethnic group who comprised only a tiny fraction of Israel's overall population, like the Druze. But you don't want to talk about that, you'd rather focus on topics for which there is no, or very little, real evidence.
"But there's no non-evidence either."
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/amp/arts/film/who-controls-hollywood/article19670867/ "
Or maybe @bhops could say something about this instead if you don't have the brainpower to do so yourself, Derek. If you're willing to believe bullshit like Q, surely you wouldn't overlook actual evidence of something when it's presented to you? Unless you have a good reason not to do so --- which is what, exactly? Ancestral ties? It's certainly not to protect your reputation, since you're already the laughing stock of morrissey-solo.com, no offence intended
You wouldnt know there were any Jews in Hollywood from watching the movies.
And where is the outrage with Arab Muslims controlling 100 percent of everything in Arab Muslim countries anyway?
scatterkeir
Well-Known Member
I'm not going to bother with you any more, you're far too daft.
Q spreads loads of bullshit to idiots, the sort of bullshit that often leads to terrorist acts by those idiots.
If you think such acts are nost likely false-flag events by the deep state Alex Jones has stolen your bullshit detector and you have no access to Occam's razor.
We just found out that a facility was busted that was training people to commit school-shootings. You seem to be struggling to support a particular narrative rather than looking at the facts. If you think it's outlandish that an attack could be carried out to support a particular agenda, then you're pretty naive. What is Operation Northwoods?
"Operation Northwoods was a proposed false flag operation against the Cuban government that originated within the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) and the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) of the United States government in 1962. The proposals called for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) or other U.S. government operatives to commit acts of terrorism against American civilians and military targets, blaming it on the Cuban government, and using it to justify a war against Cuba. The plans detailed in the document included the possible assassination of Cuban émigrés, sinking boats of Cuban refugees on the high seas, hijacking planes, blowing up a U.S. ship, and orchestrating violent terrorism in U.S. cities.[2] The proposals were rejected by the Kennedy administration.[3][4][5]
...the operation recommended developing a "Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington"."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods
So you really think it would be unreasonable to expect the deep-state to set up an attack that would implicate Q people in order to discredit by terror the movement and make its supporters look like a bunch of insane conspiracy theorist terrorists?
Why is the mainstream media giving Q so much attention? From their perspective, they ensure that everyone knows about Q, they paint it in a certain light, and then they carry out a false flag attack and say "we told you so. These people are crazy and violent."
Just watch. If a major attack happens that gets attributed to Q in the near future, you heard it here first, and hopefully you'll understand why it will have happened. Hopefully such an attack can be averted, but this all-out mainstream media push is certainly not for nothing from the perspective of the bad actors.
Last edited:
A
Anonymous
Guest
You need to shut the f*** up you dumb repetitive loser. The worst thing about the internet age is that it has given blithering imbeciles like you a platform to spew your nonsense out into the world. How many times how you typed out this "it's not about politics" tripe on here now? Ten? Fifteen? It makes me want to punch you repeatedly in the throat. Is that the response you're aiming for? I can't see how you would expect for it to bring about any other response from people than them wanting to kick you very hard in the face. If it's designed to "wake people up" to whatever slumber you think they're in then it's time to go back to the drawing board, because it's only waking people up to what an annoying little prick you are.
I love the haters and losers! Nice!
Well, QAnon is happening. It's gone mainstream. So what now?
It is also so interesting to me that, in his monologue, Willy Maher was so fixated on the pedophile aspect of things. Q is much more than "rounding up the pedos," Willy. But I guess that's what Maher is worried about.
Q is about the truth in regard to all topics. Q is about freedom in all realms. I have discussed a lot of this over the course of the thread.
Q is about justice for people like Beverly Eckert, who died trying to find the truth about what happened on 9/11 when her husband was killed. Q is about Seth Rich and everyone else who has been killed. There are too many to list here, but this is for them.
Q is fighting to make sure that things like MK-Ultra and Operation Mockingbird never occur again. Q is taking down the military industrial complex and the media industrial complex.
Q is about putting an end to the twisted ideologies that have been pushed by malevolent people to destroy society.
Q is about exposing the rigged economic and corporate structures when it comes to entities like Google and Facebook that are extensions of the intelligence agencies. These projects track, control, and constrain our existence and actions at every turn.
Q is about exposing and eliminating the pharmaceutical industrial complex that pushes harmful drugs and withholds cures.
Q is about transparency when it comes to disclosing everything from technologies that have been withheld to corruption that has been covered up.
Q is about changing the ridiculous and rigged monetary system that allows governments to go trillions of dollars in debt while printing as much money as they want while being held hostage by various domestic and foreign interests.
Q is about taking down the secret clubs of elites in the Church, Hollywood, and everywhere else and putting an end to their games in which we the people are their pawns.
Q is about real equality between people, and putting an end to the intentional division that has been brought about in so many ways, through the media, through war, through economic strife, etc., by the people who rule over us.
Q is about NO MORE POINTLESS WARS.
Q is about world peace: the neutralization of threats like North Korea and Iran, and working together with Russia.
There is so much to cover. This is only the beginning.
It really doesn't get any bigger than this. Maher's bosses and people in that club want you to believe that what you have is good enough and that none of this is possible. The truth is, we can have better. President Trump is leading the way as an example that we can always do better and we do not have to settle for less. We can win again, not just lose all the time, and the future can truly be better for everyone.
Q is about the truth in regard to all topics. Q is about freedom in all realms. I have discussed a lot of this over the course of the thread.
Q is about justice for people like Beverly Eckert, who died trying to find the truth about what happened on 9/11 when her husband was killed. Q is about Seth Rich and everyone else who has been killed. There are too many to list here, but this is for them.
Q is fighting to make sure that things like MK-Ultra and Operation Mockingbird never occur again. Q is taking down the military industrial complex and the media industrial complex.
Q is about putting an end to the twisted ideologies that have been pushed by malevolent people to destroy society.
Q is about exposing the rigged economic and corporate structures when it comes to entities like Google and Facebook that are extensions of the intelligence agencies. These projects track, control, and constrain our existence and actions at every turn.
Q is about exposing and eliminating the pharmaceutical industrial complex that pushes harmful drugs and withholds cures.
Q is about transparency when it comes to disclosing everything from technologies that have been withheld to corruption that has been covered up.
Q is about changing the ridiculous and rigged monetary system that allows governments to go trillions of dollars in debt while printing as much money as they want while being held hostage by various domestic and foreign interests.
Q is about taking down the secret clubs of elites in the Church, Hollywood, and everywhere else and putting an end to their games in which we the people are their pawns.
Q is about real equality between people, and putting an end to the intentional division that has been brought about in so many ways, through the media, through war, through economic strife, etc., by the people who rule over us.
Q is about NO MORE POINTLESS WARS.
Q is about world peace: the neutralization of threats like North Korea and Iran, and working together with Russia.
There is so much to cover. This is only the beginning.
It really doesn't get any bigger than this. Maher's bosses and people in that club want you to believe that what you have is good enough and that none of this is possible. The truth is, we can have better. President Trump is leading the way as an example that we can always do better and we do not have to settle for less. We can win again, not just lose all the time, and the future can truly be better for everyone.
G
Gimme Some Truth
Guest
"What now"? Nothing. You're sitting alone in your bedroom in your underpants typing on forums about conspiracy theories just like you were before QAnon "went mainstream", and just like you still will be after it all fizzles out. Ask yourself "what now?" regarding your personal life; it's your future.
Will it seem worth it 20 years from now? Or will the very thought of your mere existence way back in 2018 embarrass you to the point where you want the ground to open up and swallow you?
Well, maybe in 2038 Trump will have demolished the global paedophile cabal, Q will be in the history books with his posts taught to children in schools, and there will be statues erected of Trump and Q in every town and city in North America.
This will bring all races together with people across America from all backgrounds regularly meeting up to join hands and sing Kumbaya, all thanks to Trump and Q.
"It's not about politics" will be etched into the base of the Statue of Liberty.
Meanwhile, you Derek will be elected Mayor of Toronto where you'll be thought of as something of a hero and prophet and looked upon with awe due to your early support of Q.
Hillary Clinton, in 2038, aged 90, will have her parole denied for the third time.
The Hollywood epic 'The Story of Q', with Ryan Gosling as Q, will be released to rave reviews.
Then you'll wake up, Derek, and you'll still be in your underpants in your room in 2018 in front of your computer.
Oh my god. it's Robby!
spontaneously luminescent
FYI: one can ignore Derek btw
FYI: one can ignore Derek btw
If only you could, Robby!
A
Anonymous
Guest
187k 'likes' for this tweet. There is nothing that can bridge this gap. And when I say 'gap' I don't mean the "wealth gap".
IQ gap would be more accurate.
IQ gap would be more accurate.
Hi Untruth. Hope you're having a lovely evening!
G
Gimme Some Truth
Guest
Who pushed and financed Blaire White in becoming the face of transgender "conservatism"? Milo for gay "conservatism". Candace Owens for 'red-pilled' black "conservatism"? These things don't just happen organically.
Since conservatism was always essentially white, heterosexual, and pro-family - the Nixonian "silent majority" - some people somewhere seemingly decided that conservatism needed re-modelling, removing the white identity element entirely from its core.
Turning it into nothing more than arguments about feminism, how bad identity politics is (when faced with racial solidarity movements of any race), and the non-existence of the wage gap.
Now the majority of white so-called conservatives I encounter online invariably support people like Milo, Owens, Israel of course; with any discussion of white identity, something conservatism was built on, causing them to run a million miles away.
What @bhops and @Derek17 believe in is not 'conservatism'. It's a bastardization of conservatism, it's maybe a conservatism which seeks to conserve whatever debris of a society is left after neo-liberalism and Zionist "neo-conservatism" wreaked havoc over it for decades, but it's not something which a conservative from forty or fifty years ago would have any ideological affinity with.
I'm no fan of his, but picture William F. Buckley Jr trying to make sense of Milo and 'Q'. I think he might retreat to a cabin in the woods and become another Ted Kaczynski.
Since conservatism was always essentially white, heterosexual, and pro-family - the Nixonian "silent majority" - some people somewhere seemingly decided that conservatism needed re-modelling, removing the white identity element entirely from its core.
Turning it into nothing more than arguments about feminism, how bad identity politics is (when faced with racial solidarity movements of any race), and the non-existence of the wage gap.
Now the majority of white so-called conservatives I encounter online invariably support people like Milo, Owens, Israel of course; with any discussion of white identity, something conservatism was built on, causing them to run a million miles away.
What @bhops and @Derek17 believe in is not 'conservatism'. It's a bastardization of conservatism, it's maybe a conservatism which seeks to conserve whatever debris of a society is left after neo-liberalism and Zionist "neo-conservatism" wreaked havoc over it for decades, but it's not something which a conservative from forty or fifty years ago would have any ideological affinity with.
I'm no fan of his, but picture William F. Buckley Jr trying to make sense of Milo and 'Q'. I think he might retreat to a cabin in the woods and become another Ted Kaczynski.
G
Gimme Some Truth
Guest
Excise the mention of Buckley, I forgot he was in favour of the Vietnam war, that bellicosity stretches back a long way -- replace him with your average '60s family man conservative who wanted his grandchildren to inherit a country which held on to the same sort of values he had grown up with. Milo's not that. There would be a few million Kaczynskis if they saw what the western world was to turn into.
