It’s not about politics

ForgotHowIGotMyName

Well-Known Member
Actually, I believe in liberal values and systems. I don't believe in Q, but I do hope that Q is legit.
The main gripe of Q in the nationalist community is that it does not deal enough with systemic and structural issues.

According to Q people, the only thing wrong with our system is that it is full of Satanic pedophile. If we could just get rid of those Satanic globalist pedophiles and replace them with freedom-loving patriots, then the system will work just fine. That's just not true. The issues we are facing are a lot more complicated than that.
Granted, that's an issue with a lot of political communities. The Alt Right had a tendency to make EVERYTHING about race and culture while ignoring economics. The Marxist community has a tendency to try to make EVERYTHING about class struggle and insist that culture and identity are irrelevant. I think there is a natural human tendency when trying to understand the world to seek simplicity, to find one or two variable to explain everything.
QAnon seems to take this drive for simplicity down to the lowest common denominator: it's bad people. There's the old saying "Small minds talk about people, medium minds talk about events, and great minds talk about ideas". QAnon talks about people.

There's also the tendency of the Q crowd to try to understand current events within the context of outdated concepts: communism, fascism, socialism, etc.
First of all, , to put it in very normie terms, that's like someone in the 1930's trying to understand Hitler within the context of Napoleon. "This Hitler guy is totally Napoleonic!" Or like "Who does this Hitler guy think he is? Julius Caesar?" Like maybe there are some superficial similarities to Napoleon and Hitler but ultimately, you are dealing with a completely different animal. What we are dealing with is neither fascism, socialism, or communism. What we are dealing with is Neoliberalism. You might call it capitalism but it ain't your daddy's capitalism. What we are facing is something new.
Secondly, I don't think most Q people really understand what those concepts mean. A lot of people use "fascism" as a catch-all term for authoritarianism and "socialism" to mean state control. There's also a lot of binary thinking "You have criticism of capitalism? Then you must be a communist!" Or "You're against liberalism? Then you must be a fascist!"

I consume a fair bit of socialist content. Now, I'm not a socialist but I find a lot of their analysis fairly useful. They are pretty good at dissecting structures of power. And lemme tell you that REAL socialists (ie, people who don't claim to be socialist just to be trendy) are often pretty based. Often more based than mainstream Republicans.
REAL socialists are anti-globalist. The 1999 World Trade Organization riots in Seattle was organized by socialists. REAL socialists are anti-anti-white. They believe that "white privilege" theory undermines worker solidarity.
Bernie Sanders used to be an immigration hawk before he sold out to the DNC establishment (which ultimately proved to be a mistake).

They are also anti-war and anti-Zionist.
I have my disagreements with socialists but gun to my head, I would take a socialist over a neocon any f***ing day of the week.
 

The_Beginning

Well-Known Member
A primary source isn't the mainstream media.
If they fabricate the source, it sure is.

People who cover Q use an anonymous source, Q, and work tirelessly to try to decode, verify, and corroborate, presenting possibilities but rarely making definitive claims. The mainstream media use various anonymous sources and make definitive claims and expect you to believe what they say immediately, and if you ask any questions, they'll label you a "conspiracy theorist."
 

Nerak

Reverse Ferret
If they fabricate the source, it sure is.

People who cover Q use an anonymous source, Q, and work tirelessly to try to decode, verify, and corroborate, presenting possibilities but rarely making definitive claims. The mainstream media use various anonymous sources and make definitive claims and expect you to believe what they say immediately, and if you ask any questions, they'll label you a "conspiracy theorist."

If the source isn't verifiable, then it wouldn't pass muster.
 

The_Beginning

Well-Known Member
The main gripe of Q in the nationalist community is that it does not deal enough with systemic and structural issues.

According to Q people, the only thing wrong with our system is that it is full of Satanic pedophile. If we could just get rid of those Satanic globalist pedophiles and replace them with freedom-loving patriots, then the system will work just fine. That's just not true. The issues we are facing are a lot more complicated than that.
Granted, that's an issue with a lot of political communities. The Alt Right had a tendency to make EVERYTHING about race and culture while ignoring economics. The Marxist community has a tendency to try to make EVERYTHING about class struggle and insist that culture and identity are irrelevant. I think there is a natural human tendency when trying to understand the world to seek simplicity, to find one or two variable to explain everything.
QAnon seems to take this drive for simplicity down to the lowest common denominator: it's bad people. There's the old saying "Small minds talk about people, medium minds talk about events, and great minds talk about ideas". QAnon talks about people.

There's also the tendency of the Q crowd to try to understand current events within the context of outdated concepts: communism, fascism, socialism, etc.
First of all, , to put it in very normie terms, that's like someone in the 1930's trying to understand Hitler within the context of Napoleon. "This Hitler guy is totally Napoleonic!" Or like "Who does this Hitler guy think he is? Julius Caesar?" Like maybe there are some superficial similarities to Napoleon and Hitler but ultimately, you are dealing with a completely different animal. What we are dealing with is neither fascism, socialism, or communism. What we are dealing with is Neoliberalism. You might call it capitalism but it ain't your daddy's capitalism. What we are facing is something new.
Secondly, I don't think most Q people really understand what those concepts mean. A lot of people use "fascism" as a catch-all term for authoritarianism and "socialism" to mean state control. There's also a lot of binary thinking "You have criticism of capitalism? Then you must be a communist!" Or "You're against liberalism? Then you must be a fascist!"

I consume a fair bit of socialist content. Now, I'm not a socialist but I find a lot of their analysis fairly useful. They are pretty good at dissecting structures of power. And lemme tell you that REAL socialists (ie, people who don't claim to be socialist just to be trendy) are often pretty based. Often more based than mainstream Republicans.
REAL socialists are anti-globalist. The 1999 World Trade Organization riots in Seattle was organized by socialists. REAL socialists are anti-anti-white. They believe that "white privilege" theory undermines worker solidarity.
Bernie Sanders used to be an immigration hawk before he sold out to the DNC establishment (which ultimately proved to be a mistake).

They are also anti-war and anti-Zionist.
I have my disagreements with socialists but gun to my head, I would take a socialist over a neocon any f***ing day of the week.
Even you end up repeating nonsense mainstream media talking points. The whole "satanic pedophiles" meme is practically a footnote. Q is about corruption on a systemic level involving all aspects of society. I mean, if Q is legit and succeeds, I'm sure that the biggest effect in people's lives will be economic. If you listen to the X22 Report, he talks about getting back on the Gold Standard, the petro dollar, etc.—things that I personally have a limited understanding about. But, those economic factors tie into geopolitical factors, obviously, in regard to oil, foreign wars, etc. Yes, Q is about exposing some truly evil individuals, but, above all, it is about exposing the corrupt system: the corrupt media, the flaws with the economy, the corrupt war machine, election fraud, the problems with a lack of border security and why corrupt people want open borders (economic benefits for the wealthy, drug trafficking, human trafficking, etc.)... I could go on. If the system remains fundamentally broken and corrupt, it really doesn't matter if you remove the corrupt people; they would simply be replaced. No, Q is about fixing the entire corrupt system worldwide, ultimately.

Today's socialism is basically obsessed with identity, fam. Intersectional neo-Marxism is a white supremacist's wet dream. All it really is is a thinly veiled expansion of neo-Nazism. Instead of just blaming Jews, they blame all whites (and other groups). I can understand why a Hitlerian would be all in with intersectional neo-Marxism because I'm sure they think that it will help to bring about many of their aims and strengthen their position. Anteefuh act like a bunch of fascists, after all, even if they are technically anarchists and anarcho-communists or whatever. I no longer see the point in distinguishing between anteefuh, BLM, Hitler-lovers, or any other equity-seeking, socialistic identitarians. They are all working toward the same general goals.

Yes, Bernard Sanders used to be more sensible about immigration. There are times when I think that Sanders circa 2015 and prior would be better than the establishment, but socialists are ultimately spineless losers. They will always sell out. They will always cave. They are weaklings who do not believe in competition, so they can never really win anything. They are too lazy, too entitled, too naive... I could go on.

I think Trump has identified the right way forward. He has managed to create a liberal-conservative alliance of patriots. There is really nothing better than that at this point. Oh, and if Trump really is just caving and walking away, I will be quite disappointed, but how out of character would that be? I'm half surprised that the media aren't warning about an inevitable coup attempt, quite honestly, but I'm sure the establishment cronies are nervous still.
 

Born to Harangue

All aboard for funtime.

Fake news from the Alt Right. Jews are only 40% of Biden's cabinet picks. I'm glad that's been cleared up.

For Prosecutors, Trump's Clemency Decisions Were a 'Kick in the Teeth'

EsXar_uVkAAOT7V.jpeg
EsXasI6UcAEvI_s.jpeg


Trump pardons several Jewish figures as he exits White House through back door

"Also benefitting from Trump’s waived sentence was Abel Holtz, 86, a former bank chairman who lied to a grand jury, and Salomon Melgen, a Florida eye surgeon and political benefactor once active in Miami’s pro-Israel community, who used his private jet to garner influence.

Together with senior politician Bob Menendez, former chairman of the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Melgen was sentenced for bribery, conspiracy, fraud, and violating the Travel Act, after he gave Menendez around £750,000 “to promote Melgen’s personal and business interests”.

Melgen had earlier been convicted of stealing £50 million from Medicare by persuading elderly patients to undergo unnecessary eye treatments, earning a separate 17-year custodial sentence."
 

ForgotHowIGotMyName

Well-Known Member
Even you end up repeating nonsense mainstream media talking points. The whole "satanic pedophiles" meme is practically a footnote. Q is about corruption on a systemic level involving all aspects of society.

OK, you seem very passionate and committed to what you believe. Despite our differences, I'd like to find common ground with you. I don't consider you "the enemy" nor do I think you should consider me "the enemy". We are part of the same struggle. We may disagree about the nature of the struggle and what the end goal is but the fact is that our fates are intertwined. So for the sake of solidarity, I will give you the benefit of the doubt that Q is about more than Satanic pedophiles.

That said, I will say that if people think that all QAnon is about is Satanic Pedophiles, that is a failure of your movement. You can not rely on the MSM to get your message out.

I've made the same criticism of the Alt Right of old:
In 2017, White Nationalism received more attention from the MSM than it ever hoped. While these hatchet pieces have done much to bring brand awareness to near maximum, much of the public is not any closer to knowing what we actually believe than they were a year ago. For all the attention the MSM lavishes on us, one thing they have not and will never do is give White Nationalism a fair hearing. All interviews are deceptively edited to portray White Nationalists in the most unflattering light, omitting any important talking points.

If people have the wrong idea about y'all, that's on y'all. That means that you didn't work hard enough and/or smart enough.


Today's socialism is basically obsessed with identity, fam. Intersectional neo-Marxism is a white supremacist's wet dream. All it really is is a thinly veiled expansion of neo-Nazism. Instead of just blaming Jews, they blame all whites (and other groups). I can understand why a Hitlerian would be all in with intersectional neo-Marxism because I'm sure they think that it will help to bring about many of their aims and strengthen their position.

Now, I am a lot of things. I am an unapologetic racist, white nationalist, and anti-Semite. But one thing I am not is a Nazi apologist or Hitler fanboy. I will acknowledge that I am something of an outlier. Anti-Nazi white nationalists are pretty goddamn rare but I am one of them. Anyway, that's a completely different discussion.
I was talking about old school class-first Marxists. IMO, old school class-based Marxists are not anywhere nearly as toxic as liberal SJW's. Actual old school Marxist are at least working from a coherent philosophical framework. What Marxists believe today is more or less that same as what Marxists believed 100 years ago.
However, modern liberals have a much more make-it-up-as-you-go-along approach. What makes political correctness so tyrannical is two things. First, you can never be sure what the rules are at any given moment. Secondly and more cruelly, when new rules come into effect, they are retroactive. You can be "cancelled" for things you said 10 years ago which were not un-PC when you said them but are now .

The thing that makes Antifa so awful is that they are communist AND SJW's. I don't consider them REAL Marxists.


Anteefuh act like a bunch of fascists, after all, even if they are technically anarchists and anarcho-communists or whatever. I no longer see the point in distinguishing between anteefuh, BLM, Hitler-lovers, or any other equity-seeking, socialistic identitarians. They are all working toward the same general goals.
n that at this point.
The only thing Antifa, BLM, and white nationalists have in common is that they are collectivist, illiberal, and pro-state. Again, this is something of a Cold War paradigm. They do not have the same goals. One wants to preserve and honor the past: white nationalists. It's just that white nationalists believe that one has to be illiberal in order to preserve tradition whereas BLM and Antifa wish to use illiberalism to destroy the past.

Antifa are not fascists in any way shape or form, unless, again, you are using "fascist" as a catch-all term for authoritatianism.


I think Trump has identified the right way forward. He has managed to create a liberal-conservative alliance of patriots. There is really nothing better than that at this point. Oh, and if Trump really is just caving and walking away, I will be quite disappointed, but how out of character would that be? I'm half surprised that the media aren't warning about an inevitable coup attempt, quite honestly, but I'm sure the establishment cronies are nervous still.

Trump is like Christopher Columbus.
Christopher Columbus set out into the Atlantic trying to find a Western route to India and Columbus died believing that is exactly what he found. In reality, what Columbus had actually stumbled upon was actually something more significant and profound than anything he could have possibly imagined. He had discovered a whole new world.
Likewise, Trump, perhaps by accident, tapped into a certain undiscovered cultural vein that set the whole world on fire. And yet like Columbus, I don't think he understood the sheer magnitude and significance of his discovery. Trump thought he had just come up with a new marketing gimmick. In reality, he had unleashed a fire that will change the world.
I will never counter-signal Trump. I am well aware of all his flaws. I am well aware that he is a Zionist, a narcissist, a liar, and a fool who was easily mislead by his backroom staff. I am under no illusions about who Trump is.

But he did something so profound, so magnificent, and so beautiful, he will forever have my eternal gratitude.


I could go on.

Look, bro. If you would like to debate a white nationalist or just make the case for QAnon, PM me. I could ask around and see if I can get you on an Alt Right livestream or a podcast. QAnon is a hot topic at the moment and if you feel confident enough in your beliefs, I could see to it that you get a fair hearing. If nothing else, it would be educational for us nationalists and for you Q types, it will be an opportunity to clear up any misunderstandings about your movement.
I'm for real. If you are interested, hit me up. Just yesterday, someone asked me to appear on their livestream but I don't do livestreams (because reasons). But if you would like to, I could recommend you in my stead.
 

The_Beginning

Well-Known Member

Fake news from the Alt Right. Jews are only 40% of Biden's cabinet picks. I'm glad that's been cleared up.

For Prosecutors, Trump's Clemency Decisions Were a 'Kick in the Teeth'

View attachment 67847 View attachment 67848

Trump pardons several Jewish figures as he exits White House through back door

"Also benefitting from Trump’s waived sentence was Abel Holtz, 86, a former bank chairman who lied to a grand jury, and Salomon Melgen, a Florida eye surgeon and political benefactor once active in Miami’s pro-Israel community, who used his private jet to garner influence.

Together with senior politician Bob Menendez, former chairman of the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Melgen was sentenced for bribery, conspiracy, fraud, and violating the Travel Act, after he gave Menendez around £750,000 “to promote Melgen’s personal and business interests”.

Melgen had earlier been convicted of stealing £50 million from Medicare by persuading elderly patients to undergo unnecessary eye treatments, earning a separate 17-year custodial sentence."
Are you proud of being a social justice warrior?
 

Nerak

Reverse Ferret
OK, you seem very passionate and committed to what you believe. Despite our differences, I'd like to find common ground with you. I don't consider you "the enemy" nor do I think you should consider me "the enemy". We are part of the same struggle. We may disagree about the nature of the struggle and what the end goal is but the fact is that our fates are intertwined. So for the sake of solidarity, I will give you the benefit of the doubt that Q is about more than Satanic pedophiles.

That said, I will say that if people think that all QAnon is about is Satanic Pedophiles, that is a failure of your movement. You can not rely on the MSM to get your message out.

I've made the same criticism of the Alt Right of old:
In 2017, White Nationalism received more attention from the MSM than it ever hoped. While these hatchet pieces have done much to bring brand awareness to near maximum, much of the public is not any closer to knowing what we actually believe than they were a year ago. For all the attention the MSM lavishes on us, one thing they have not and will never do is give White Nationalism a fair hearing. All interviews are deceptively edited to portray White Nationalists in the most unflattering light, omitting any important talking points.

If people have the wrong idea about y'all, that's on y'all. That means that you didn't work hard enough and/or smart enough.




Now, I am a lot of things. I am an unapologetic racist, white nationalist, and anti-Semite. But one thing I am not is a Nazi apologist or Hitler fanboy. I will acknowledge that I am something of an outlier. Anti-Nazi white nationalists are pretty goddamn rare but I am one of them. Anyway, that's a completely different discussion.
I was talking about old school class-first Marxists. IMO, old school class-based Marxists are not anywhere nearly as toxic as liberal SJW's. Actual old school Marxist are at least working from a coherent philosophical framework. What Marxists believe today is more or less that same as what Marxists believed 100 years ago.
However, modern liberals have a much more make-it-up-as-you-go-along approach. What makes political correctness so tyrannical is two things. First, you can never be sure what the rules are at any given moment. Secondly and more cruelly, when new rules come into effect, they are retroactive. You can be "cancelled" for things you said 10 years ago which were not un-PC when you said them but are now .

The thing that makes Antifa so awful is that they are communist AND SJW's. I don't consider them REAL Marxists.



The only thing Antifa, BLM, and white nationalists have in common is that they are collectivist, illiberal, and pro-state. Again, this is something of a Cold War paradigm. They do not have the same goals. One wants to preserve and honor the past: white nationalists. It's just that white nationalists believe that one has to be illiberal in order to preserve tradition whereas BLM and Antifa wish to use illiberalism to destroy the past.

Antifa are not fascists in any way shape or form, unless, again, you are using "fascist" as a catch-all term for authoritatianism.




Trump is like Christopher Columbus.
Christopher Columbus set out into the Atlantic trying to find a Western route to India and Columbus died believing that is exactly what he found. In reality, what Columbus had actually stumbled upon was actually something more significant and profound than anything he could have possibly imagined. He had discovered a whole new world.
Likewise, Trump, perhaps by accident, tapped into a certain undiscovered cultural vein that set the whole world on fire. And yet like Columbus, I don't think he understood the sheer magnitude and significance of his discovery. Trump thought he had just come up with a new marketing gimmick. In reality, he had unleashed a fire that will change the world.
I will never counter-signal Trump. I am well aware of all his flaws. I am well aware that he is a Zionist, a narcissist, a liar, and a fool who was easily mislead by his backroom staff. I am under no illusions about who Trump is.

But he did something so profound, so magnificent, and so beautiful, he will forever have my eternal gratitude.




Look, bro. If you would like to debate a white nationalist or just make the case for QAnon, PM me. I could ask around and see if I can get you on an Alt Right livestream or a podcast. QAnon is a hot topic at the moment and if you feel confident enough in your beliefs, I could see to it that you get a fair hearing. If nothing else, it would be educational for us nationalists and for you Q types, it will be an opportunity to clear up any misunderstandings about your movement.
I'm for real. If you are interested, hit me up. Just yesterday, someone asked me to appear on their livestream but I don't do livestreams (because reasons). But if you would like to, I could recommend you in my stead.

What reasons?

Is Travis LeBlanc your stage name from the comedy circuit?
 
V

Vegan Cro Spirit 555

Guest


:rolleyes:

Once you locate the 'lying and distorting' sources then
you can set yourself to find the lying and distorting source
of the first group of lying and distorting sources and so on and
so forth checking for lying and distoring sources into infinity.:mad:

when all you have to do is pick out any Fake C psycho babble.
blatant psychobabbleplagerism.:blushing:

this is why FC is broke and having to 'work it' at the park.:straightface:
 

ForgotHowIGotMyName

Well-Known Member
What reasons?

Is Travis LeBlanc your stage name from the comedy circuit?

I am one of the few people in the Dissident Right that goes by their real name. I decided to do so and I am able to get away with it for reasons which are very specific to me (don't try this at home).

Basically, some of the people I knew in my comedy days have gone on to become famous, others have gotten high-profile writing jobs, and others have become big social media personalities. I'm still friends with a lot of them on social media. I'm not naming names because a) I don't want to get them in trouble and b) bragging about famous people you know is ultra-gay. I mean, it's not like it's some kind of accomplishment on my part. Anyone could do it. If you live in a major city and get involved in the local comedy scene, in a few years, you will know some celebrities.

Point is that I have the ear of people who have the ear of people and in my very specific position, I figured could do more good for The Cause under my own name than I could if I created an alter ego. I could reach those people under my own name but I couldn't under a pseudonym . So I made a conscious decision to make the sacrifice and go under my own name.

I don't do streams and podcasts because I don't want the level of attention that goes along with being an e-celeb. Our enemies (ADL, SPLC, Antifa, etc) don't seem to care all that much about writers.
Their top priorities are
-People who do irl activism
-People who are in "groups"
-E-celebs

But they don't seem to care as much about writers. The exception is if the writer runs a website. Like they care about Andrew Anglin, Greg Johnson, and Peter Brimelow because they run The Daily Stormer, Counter-Currents, and VDare respectively but they average everyday writer? They don't seem to care all that much about them.
But if I started doing a bunch of podcasts and livestreams, well, then I wouldn't be just a writer anymore. Then I would be an e-celeb. That would put me in a different category and then I would have a bunch of people putting a ton of effort into trying destroy me. Before you know it, I'd have people harassing my family. I would have journalists tracking down my ex-girlfriends, elementary school teachers and high school friends and coercing them into making statements denouncing me. That's the kind of shit that goes along with being an e-celeb. I don't want that level of attention.
My family is very understanding and supportive. They don't agree with all my positions but they are willing to indulge my flights on fancy. In return, I try to make it as painless for them as possible. I am willing to make sacrifices for what I believe but I don't expect anyone else to make sacrifices for what I believe.

Some people have accused me of saying the things I say for attention but honestly, I could be attention-whoring a lot harder than I do. I would not want the level of attention that Nick Fuentes gets. I'd rather be the guy that Nick Fuentes reads. I'm perfectly happy to let Fuentes take all the slings and arrows while I whisper in his ear from the background.
Like I am willing to put myself out there but I'm not interested in chasing the spotlight. I would probably do more harm than good for The Cause if I did. I have the exact amount of notoriety that I want: enough that I feel like I am part of the conversation but not so much that I'm worth anyone's time, resources, and effort to destroy.

Maybe after both of my parents are dead, I'll reconsider.
 

Nerak

Reverse Ferret
I am one of the few people in the Dissident Right that goes by their real name. I decided to do so and I am able to get away with it for reasons which are very specific to me (don't try this at home).

Basically, some of the people I knew in my comedy days have gone on to become famous, others have gotten high-profile writing jobs, and others have become big social media personalities. I'm still friends with a lot of them on social media. I'm not naming names because a) I don't want to get them in trouble and b) bragging about famous people you know is ultra-gay. I mean, it's not like it's some kind of accomplishment on my part. Anyone could do it. If you live in a major city and get involved in the local comedy scene, in a few years, you will know some celebrities.

Point is that I have the ear of people who have the ear of people and in my very specific position, I figured could do more good for The Cause under my own name than I could if I created an alter ego. I could reach those people under my own name but I couldn't under a pseudonym . So I made a conscious decision to make the sacrifice and go under my own name.

I don't do streams and podcasts because I don't want the level of attention that goes along with being an e-celeb. Our enemies (ADL, SPLC, Antifa, etc) don't seem to care all that much about writers.
Their top priorities are
-People who do irl activism
-People who are in "groups"
-E-celebs

But they don't seem to care as much about writers. The exception is if the writer runs a website. Like they care about Andrew Anglin, Greg Johnson, and Peter Brimelow because they run The Daily Stormer, Counter-Currents, and VDare respectively but they average everyday writer? They don't seem to care all that much about them.
But if I started doing a bunch of podcasts and livestreams, well, then I wouldn't be just a writer anymore. Then I would be an e-celeb. That would put me in a different category and then I would have a bunch of people putting a ton of effort into trying destroy me. Before you know it, I'd have people harassing my family. I would have journalists tracking down my ex-girlfriends, elementary school teachers and high school friends and coercing them into making statements denouncing me. That's the kind of shit that goes along with being an e-celeb. I don't want that level of attention.
My family is very understanding and supportive. They don't agree with all my positions but they are willing to indulge my flights on fancy. In return, I try to make it as painless for them as possible. I am willing to make sacrifices for what I believe but I don't expect anyone else to make sacrifices for what I believe.

Some people have accused me of saying the things I say for attention but honestly, I could be attention-whoring a lot harder than I do. I would not want the level of attention that Nick Fuentes gets. I'd rather be the guy that Nick Fuentes reads. I'm perfectly happy to let Fuentes take all the slings and arrows while I whisper in his ear from the background.
Like I am willing to put myself out there but I'm not interested in chasing the spotlight. I would probably do more harm than good for The Cause if I did. I have the exact amount of notoriety that I want: enough that I feel like I am part of the conversation but not so much that I'm worth anyone's time, resources, and effort to destroy.

Maybe after both of my parents are dead, I'll reconsider.

I expect you could guess that I hope you abandon the cause & work for something better - but I'll say it anyway.

Cosmopolitan bohemia is fun.
 

Nerak

Reverse Ferret
:rolleyes:

Once you locate the 'lying and distorting' sources then
you can set yourself to find the lying and distorting source
of the first group of lying and distorting sources and so on and
so forth checking for lying and distoring sources into infinity.:mad:

when all you have to do is pick out any Fake C psycho babble.
blatant psychobabbleplagerism.:blushing:

this is why FC is broke and having to 'work it' at the park.:straightface:

IMG_20210123_124809.jpg
 

Verso

Well-Known Member
I am one of the few people in the Dissident Right that goes by their real name. I decided to do so and I am able to get away with it for reasons which are very specific to me (don't try this at home).

Basically, some of the people I knew in my comedy days have gone on to become famous, others have gotten high-profile writing jobs, and others have become big social media personalities. I'm still friends with a lot of them on social media. I'm not naming names because a) I don't want to get them in trouble and b) bragging about famous people you know is ultra-gay. I mean, it's not like it's some kind of accomplishment on my part. Anyone could do it. If you live in a major city and get involved in the local comedy scene, in a few years, you will know some celebrities.

Point is that I have the ear of people who have the ear of people and in my very specific position, I figured could do more good for The Cause under my own name than I could if I created an alter ego. I could reach those people under my own name but I couldn't under a pseudonym . So I made a conscious decision to make the sacrifice and go under my own name.

I don't do streams and podcasts because I don't want the level of attention that goes along with being an e-celeb. Our enemies (ADL, SPLC, Antifa, etc) don't seem to care all that much about writers.
Their top priorities are
-People who do irl activism
-People who are in "groups"
-E-celebs

But they don't seem to care as much about writers. The exception is if the writer runs a website. Like they care about Andrew Anglin, Greg Johnson, and Peter Brimelow because they run The Daily Stormer, Counter-Currents, and VDare respectively but they average everyday writer? They don't seem to care all that much about them.
But if I started doing a bunch of podcasts and livestreams, well, then I wouldn't be just a writer anymore. Then I would be an e-celeb. That would put me in a different category and then I would have a bunch of people putting a ton of effort into trying destroy me. Before you know it, I'd have people harassing my family. I would have journalists tracking down my ex-girlfriends, elementary school teachers and high school friends and coercing them into making statements denouncing me. That's the kind of shit that goes along with being an e-celeb. I don't want that level of attention.
My family is very understanding and supportive. They don't agree with all my positions but they are willing to indulge my flights on fancy. In return, I try to make it as painless for them as possible. I am willing to make sacrifices for what I believe but I don't expect anyone else to make sacrifices for what I believe.

Some people have accused me of saying the things I say for attention but honestly, I could be attention-whoring a lot harder than I do. I would not want the level of attention that Nick Fuentes gets. I'd rather be the guy that Nick Fuentes reads. I'm perfectly happy to let Fuentes take all the slings and arrows while I whisper in his ear from the background.
Like I am willing to put myself out there but I'm not interested in chasing the spotlight. I would probably do more harm than good for The Cause if I did. I have the exact amount of notoriety that I want: enough that I feel like I am part of the conversation but not so much that I'm worth anyone's time, resources, and effort to destroy.

Maybe after both of my parents are dead, I'll reconsider.
This exhausting mess of delusional self-soothing would be much more convincing if your broken dreams of being successful in showbiz didn't drip from every word you type.
 

ForgotHowIGotMyName

Well-Known Member
This exhausting mess of delusional self-soothing would be much more convincing if your broken dreams of being successful in showbiz didn't drip from every word you type.

Bro, all the comedy clubs are closed due to Covid and it's unknown if they will ever open again. Several have already declared bankruptcy.

So even if I was bitter, I wouldn't be anymore
 

Verso

Well-Known Member
Bro, all the comedy clubs are closed due to Covid and it's unknown if they will ever open again. Several have already declared bankruptcy.

So even if I was bitter, I wouldn't be anymore
You and I both know that the state of the clubs being open or closed is completely irrelevant to what I'm talking about, but nice try.
 
Top Bottom