A
Anonymous
Guest
I'm sure I can't be the only one who skips every Urbanus post (apart from the ones that are one sentence long which I accidentally read while in the process of scrolling past his posts).
You mention my posts trying to claim you don't read them. You are completely obsessed with me and have no idea how creepy you are.I'm sure I can't be the only one who skips every Urbanus post (apart from the ones that are one sentence long which I accidentally read while in the process of scrolling past his posts).
Immigrant politicans in Sweden want to fund more immigration by ending the welfare system or what is left of it after they destroyed most of it.
I've seen people and heard them speak on swedish tv via a stream that made me feel safe that I was abroad instead of being at home.
The turks at war will end Sweden completely so I wonder what will happen to Germany.
It's all over and people have no idea what is about to happen to them.
This is 'The Truth'...
David has set up those captchas and everyone is an insult but also about me and what I am posting.Next, they're gonna name it the Islamic State of Sweden
Guess what the captcha was: eat cous cous. No joke!
This is 'The Truth'...
"But the new rebel is a skeptic, and will not entirely trust anything. He has no loyalty; therefore he can never be a revolutionist. And the fact that he doubts everything really gets in his way when he wants to denounce anything. For all denunciation implies a moral doctrine of some kind; and the modern revolutionist doubts not only the institution he denounces, but the doctrine by which he denounces it. Thus he writes one book complaining that imperial oppression insults the purity of women, and then he writes another book in which he insults it himself. He curses the Sultan because Christian girls lose their virginity, and then curses Mrs. Grundy because they keep it. As a politician, he will cry out that war is a waste of life, and then, as a philosopher, that all life is a waste of time. A Russian pessimist will denounce a policeman for killing a peasant, and then prove by the highest philosophical principles that the peasant ought to have killed himself. A man denounces marriage as a lie, and then denounces aristocratic profligates for treating it as a lie. He calls a flag a bauble, and then blames the oppressors of Poland or Ireland because they take away that bauble. The man of this school goes first to a political meeting, where he complains that savages are treated as if they were beasts; then he takes his hat and umbrella and goes on to a scientific meeting, where he proves that they practically are beasts. In short, the modern revolutionist, being an infinite skeptic, is always engaged in undermining his own mines. In his book on politics he attacks men for trampling on morality; in his book on ethics he attacks morality for trampling on men. Therefore the modern man in revolt has become practically useless for all purposes of revolt. By rebelling against everything he has lost his right to rebel against anything." (G.K. Chesterton, Orthodoxy, 1909)
...and today's zeitgeist.