Sure, let's just accept all sources and theories as basically equally valid and then pick some combination as the truth. If it's not exciting enough to really get the blood pumping then we can add some of our own details.
See, you really are in no danger of being silenced because you make your side look kind of kooky. It's called disinformation. Part of the goal is to hide the truth. The other part is to create various alternate versions and let them be floated as "conspiracy theories." Many of them have some element of truth in them. But they are not discouraged. They serve the purpose of the conspiracy (in X-Files terms) because people can "do the research" and discover these things, thinking that they have got the whole picture.
You, knowingly or not, help perpetuate this. AND not only do you help spread some of these alternate, possibly partially true, stories but you also associate them, and so anyone who would believe them, with paranoid speculation and marginalized political leanings. In other words you could explain exactly what happened with some controversial news story but it wouldn't matter because it's coming from a person with ideas that are easy to discredit, whether right or wrong.
You could explain the seized tankers that were in the news recently and have all the facts correct, or talk about what happened to Princess Diana and have every detail correct, but it won't matter because you're "a paranoid alt-right Nazi sympathizer. " Which you appear to be, thought "paranoid" might not be completely fair. You do like to speculate. Anyway, not the point. Remember it doesn't matter if you're right or wrong. You can easily be made to appear as an unreliable source so the Rothschilds should put you on the payroll, not kill you, assuming you're not already being paid for your posts here.