GodEmperorMorrissey
Banned
Bhops is another tool with a broken brain. I can never figure out who people like him are trying to please, exactly. He calls David Irving a raging anti-Semite who admires Hitler, but then goes on to say he *could* believe many of Irving's premises, speculates that the Holocaust death toll could be a lot lower than generally accepted figures suggest, that Churchill might have been backed by a strong Jewish lobby in his ascent to power, etc. You just had to get in that dig at Irving first, so if @The Truth or someone challenges you about it you can say "what do you mean? I don't agree with Irving, I called him a raging anti-Semite". Talk about kicking a man when he's down. Irving has more courage in his little finger than you have in your entire body.
You still dance to the tune of people with opposing views to yours; people like you are why conservatives lost out on every contentious social issue over the past 50 or 60 years. You consider yourself some kind of conservative or classical liberal or whatever other pointless label, yet a few weeks ago you were perplexed when I made a comment about Milo and you asked if I didn't consider his marriage to a black man to be a real marriage!? What the f*** was that? What do you think you're conserving? You're too busy trying to look acceptable to the opposing side, people who hate your guts no matter how many concessions you make, to realise that this kind of attitude is why your side keeps losing and will continue to do so.
After the Democrat debate the other night, where candidates attacked each other's records, Chuck Schumer came out and said they have to stop doing that and to focus on Trump. People on the left know there's strength in unity and attacking each other serves no purpose. Meanwhile you disavow plenty of right-wing people whenever you get the chance, Irving, Spencer etc., you only throw your support behind Milo or Ben Shapiro or anyone else who has some kind of minority status which gives you a get out of jail card when your views are challenged.
You back away from normal white men with families who have a strong sense of cultural and racial identity, just like all our ancestors had. Instead you speak in favour of the likes of Shapiro (who also has a strong sense of racial and cultural identity, just not the same as yours), and a degenerate waste of space like Milo. Then you can say "how can I be racist/homophobic/anti-Semitic? This person is black/gay/Jewish". It's such a weak trait, and doesn't impress people on your side nor people on the opposite side.
And it seems that you do it because you're terrified how the other side views you, for some reason. @Derek17, who started this thread, behaved in the same manner. This was exemplified earlier when you told reelfountain that he "saved himself" by saying you can't take anyone's version as the absolute truth, including Irving's. Backing down on Irving a bit is how he "saved himself". From what? You're doing the other side's groundwork for them when you make statements like that, enforcing their rules which you've come to accept as the norm. It gives you a bit of a thrill and sense of danger to be slightly right-wing, but if anyone oversteps the mark you've put down then you become just another liberal.
If you want to be liked by people on the far-left so badly, why don't you get yourself a nose ring and dye your hair blue and join them? You may as well, because the only thing you're conserving is their progressive agenda.
And the Holocaust is not the biggest event in human history. Hollywood made it the biggest event in human history in the minds of people like you. Rulers had been kicking Jews out of their regions and countries for centuries; I believe it was Edward I who kicked them out of England in the 1200s until Oliver Cromwell allowed them back in nearly 400 years later. Nazi Germany was following a similar well-worn pattern. The people in the city where I was born in Northern Europe ran the Jews out in the early 1900s for engaging in usurious behaviour; and they had only been here a very short period of time. The official line is that the Jews are always innocent in the face of these accusations, and the native people of the city were just paranoid/prejudiced, but who keeps believing that? Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me over 100 times throughout the centuries...?
Europeans don't have that fire in their bellies any more. Once upon a time they'd run people out of the city for usury, nowadays you could have rape gangs operating in your town and UncleSkinny, Surface, and the rest of the gang would call you racist for speaking out about it. And it works, because look at how you're constantly policing yourself and criticising people who would otherwise be your allies as I've just laid out.
Yeah Shapiro is an evil little man. He's a subverts truth