Tynamuna, I just ask you to think about one question: In your eyes, what is the more insidious behaviour? To offer an unequal split of royalties to which, then, everyone agrees (even though just verbaly)? Or to discover that two of your ex-bandmates did make a mistake and therefore drag them into court while being very aware throughout that you will win because they can't produce any evidence? I ask myself this question from time to time and the answer is always the same. What Johnny and Morrissey did is surely questionable but what Mike did is simply shitty behaviour. That doesn't mean that I hate Mike or that I give him hell everytime he is mentioned. Not at all. But I find it somewhat hypocritical that Johnny and especially Morrissey are always supposed to put themselves in Mike's and Andy's position but the same is never expected from them. And in that regard all these biographies lack, in my opinion. I remember that someone who was at the court case said he saw Andy and Mike talk to Johnny Rogan and I remember them being big buddies with Tony Fletcher. They are approachable and they "take part" which is obviously important. I doubt any of those writers would've had the guts to write some things if Morrissey and Johnny had been more forthcoming. But of course this is just my impression and my opinion and I'm sure someone here will jump in quickly and attack me for it.