Here are those "Liner notes by Morrissey" for the Jobriath album:

T

Tingle

Guest
THE WORD EPICINE MEANS having characteristics of both male and female. Jobriath was not that. Jobriath had no characteristics of either sex. There was an unfounded rumour that Jobriath was a man; as a child, his father had used him for experiments, and that his birth had never been recorded [presumably because nobody knew exactly what to write]. Jobriath was that kind of pop artist. The dead-white, greenish cast of the face on this CD cover should tell you as much. This is not Sacha Distel.

Sensing my cue, I bought the first Jobriath album in 1974 at Rare Records in drizzle-fizzled Manchester. Neither for the ears of the elderly nor for those with middle-aged perspectives, Jobriath voiced the excess destitution of New York’ s most tormentedly aware, whose lives were favoured by darkness. Cinematic themes of desperate dramas in paranoid shadows were presented as choppy and carnivalesque melodies.

The hairy beasts who wrote for the music press laughed Jobriath off the face of the planet. He was – at best – merely considered to be “insane”. It was clear that Jobriath was willing to go the gay distance, something that even the intelligentsia didn’t much care for. Elton John knew this in 1973; Jobriath didn’t. Surrounded on all sides by Journey, Styx, and Bachman-Turner Overdrive, Jobriath was at society’s mercy. Yet it could have worked so well.

Jobriath was armed with what, for lack of a more useful word, we are forced to call talent. Studio footage from 1972 shows Jobriath as a disciplinarian, a classically trained pianist with a most musical voice. Jobriath, apparently, had it all, and meticulously crafted each twist and turn of his Elektra recordings with obsessively complete arrangements, first-rate production, outstanding backing vocals, and a Broadway Baby’s keen ear for gospel melody. Imagine the Eno we knew in 1973 - but one who could sing and actually play well. This was Jobriath. Furthermore, in civilian drag Jobriath was not at all bad looking, ad was at precisely the right age to fool all the teen magazines of America – if such a mundane wish had occurred to him.

With the release of his second album, Creatures of the Street, the distinct atmospherics continued to work well. Jobriath’s imagination was the only thing that kept him alive, with hopes of something other than the drabness that most of us wrap ourselves up in. I was mildly shocked to catch the single “Street Corner Love” being played by Diddy David Hamilton [a small British disc jockey] on Radio 2 one mid-afternoon in 1974.

However, neither America nor England [nor Berlin, for that matter] was quit ready. Ennobled by victimization, Jobriath finally had reason to be when Elektra booted this creature back onto the streets. He was an adventure that Elektra did not wish to continue to survive. While we were all busy looking elsewhere, Jobriath quietly expired, blotted out of all creation, buried without a single line of ceremony in any known music publication throughout the world. Death is the crossing that some artists must trek in order to earn themselves a decent review. Even this, in Jobriath’s case, might backfire. In a recent detailed book on the history of Elektra Records, Jobriath was not even mentioned – not even as the customary tagline. There is, indeed a thin line between auteurism and the loony bin.

Is it really necessary to lose your mind in order to get a hit record? Well, yes, it is. Jobriath saw things as he wished they were; the actual ‘70s landscape was immaterial. Thirty years on, he is no less and insoluble mystery, and the songs remain hugely enjoyable.

Sympathetic glances towards Jobriath in the ‘70s pinned him down as a sort of 27th-rate David Bowie. So it was to David himself that I turned for official comment. Did he remember Jobriath? “Oh, HIM.” Came the royal response, “always pushing into photographs…” and for this demonstration David juts out his chin, and we instantly see the impish Jobriath tagging on and hoping for a look in.

-Morrissey

March 2004

***********

*Discuss*

I think this tells us lots about Morrissey.

I must look up meaning of "auteurism"!




jobri.jpg
 
What a bunch of crap. If you actually bought this record and "liked" it, you like Morrissey way too much. Because this record is crap, the photo is horrendous and the "guy" is a joke. Just because you like "Unlovable" doesn't mean you must like everything Morrissey does. Because besides his own songs, Morrissey has repugnant taste. Okay, New York Dolls, the Ramones and Motown are great, but scratch a little deeper and all the other stuff is awful. Take it from someone with as much money as can be found in the gutter who splurged on Klaus Nomi and pretended to like it. I didn't and I wish I didn't bother. Buy Jobriath is you're a completist, but if you're looking for life-changing genius, this isn't it.

> THE WORD EPICINE MEANS having characteristics of both male and female.
> Jobriath was not that. Jobriath had no characteristics of either sex.
> There was an unfounded rumour that Jobriath was a man; as a child, his
> father had used him for experiments, and that his birth had never been
> recorded [presumably because nobody knew exactly what to write]. Jobriath
> was that kind of pop artist. The dead-white, greenish cast of the face on
> this CD cover should tell you as much. This is not Sacha Distel.

> Sensing my cue, I bought the first Jobriath album in 1974 at Rare Records
> in drizzle-fizzled Manchester. Neither for the ears of the elderly nor for
> those with middle-aged perspectives, Jobriath voiced the excess
> destitution of New York’ s most tormentedly aware, whose lives were
> favoured by darkness. Cinematic themes of desperate dramas in paranoid
> shadows were presented as choppy and carnivalesque melodies.

> The hairy beasts who wrote for the music press laughed Jobriath off the
> face of the planet. He was – at best – merely considered to be “insane”.
> It was clear that Jobriath was willing to go the gay distance, something
> that even the intelligentsia didn’t much care for. Elton John knew this in
> 1973; Jobriath didn’t. Surrounded on all sides by Journey, Styx, and
> Bachman-Turner Overdrive, Jobriath was at society’s mercy. Yet it could
> have worked so well.

> Jobriath was armed with what, for lack of a more useful word, we are
> forced to call talent. Studio footage from 1972 shows Jobriath as a
> disciplinarian, a classically trained pianist with a most musical voice.
> Jobriath, apparently, had it all, and meticulously crafted each twist and
> turn of his Elektra recordings with obsessively complete arrangements,
> first-rate production, outstanding backing vocals, and a Broadway Baby’s
> keen ear for gospel melody. Imagine the Eno we knew in 1973 - but one who
> could sing and actually play well. This was Jobriath. Furthermore, in
> civilian drag Jobriath was not at all bad looking, ad was at precisely the
> right age to fool all the teen magazines of America – if such a mundane
> wish had occurred to him.

> With the release of his second album, Creatures of the Street, the
> distinct atmospherics continued to work well. Jobriath’s imagination was
> the only thing that kept him alive, with hopes of something other than the
> drabness that most of us wrap ourselves up in. I was mildly shocked to
> catch the single “Street Corner Love” being played by Diddy David Hamilton
> [a small British disc jockey] on Radio 2 one mid-afternoon in 1974.

> However, neither America nor England [nor Berlin, for that matter] was
> quit ready. Ennobled by victimization, Jobriath finally had reason to be
> when Elektra booted this creature back onto the streets. He was an
> adventure that Elektra did not wish to continue to survive. While we were
> all busy looking elsewhere, Jobriath quietly expired, blotted out of all
> creation, buried without a single line of ceremony in any known music
> publication throughout the world. Death is the crossing that some artists
> must trek in order to earn themselves a decent review. Even this, in
> Jobriath’s case, might backfire. In a recent detailed book on the history
> of Elektra Records, Jobriath was not even mentioned – not even as the
> customary tagline. There is, indeed a thin line between auteurism and the
> loony bin.

> Is it really necessary to lose your mind in order to get a hit record?
> Well, yes, it is. Jobriath saw things as he wished they were; the actual
> ‘70s landscape was immaterial. Thirty years on, he is no less and
> insoluble mystery, and the songs remain hugely enjoyable.

> Sympathetic glances towards Jobriath in the ‘70s pinned him down as a sort
> of 27th-rate David Bowie. So it was to David himself that I turned for
> official comment. Did he remember Jobriath? “Oh, HIM.” Came the royal
> response, “always pushing into photographs…” and for this demonstration
> David juts out his chin, and we instantly see the impish Jobriath tagging
> on and hoping for a look in.

> -Morrissey

> March 2004

> ***********

> *Discuss*

> I think this tells us lots about Morrissey.

> I must look up meaning of "auteurism"!
 
morning ian you loser

> What a bunch of crap. If you actually bought this record and
> "liked" it, you like Morrissey way too much. Because this record
> is crap, the photo is horrendous and the "guy" is a joke. Just
> because you like "Unlovable" doesn't mean you must like
> everything Morrissey does. Because besides his own songs, Morrissey has
> repugnant taste. Okay, New York Dolls, the Ramones and Motown are great,
> but scratch a little deeper and all the other stuff is awful. Take it from
> someone with as much money as can be found in the gutter who splurged on
> Klaus Nomi and pretended to like it. I didn't and I wish I didn't bother.
> Buy Jobriath is you're a completist, but if you're looking for
> life-changing genius, this isn't it.

jesus!! i knew you hated morrissey but i never knew you could steap so low ,i bought the jobriath album and i liked it i think it must be that you are far too ignorant to get it.cock
 
lol nice try

you know very well that i'm not broken and that's because YOU are him .
why don't you die.
 
We all know you are broken, it's been obvious for days, please leave NOW
 
that's f***ing hilarious you just keep deluding yourself

you and me both know the truth broken
people aren't as stupid as you might think broken
 
You've been found out

Nice try, you think that if you keep trying to accuse others the suspcicion won't fall on you, well that might have worked but you took it too far, your hysterical naming of virtually the whole site as 'broken' has left us all in no doubt that you are actually him.

BUSTED!!!! Why don't you just admit it and leave? You've been found out, no big deal, just move on and don't come back.
 
very funny you hateful cock

> Nice try, you think that if you keep trying to accuse others the
> suspcicion won't fall on you, well that might have worked but you took it
> too far, your hysterical naming of virtually the whole site as 'broken'
> has left us all in no doubt that you are actually him.

> BUSTED!!!! Why don't you just admit it and leave? You've been found out,
> no big deal, just move on and don't come back.

you know the the truth and that's all i'm saying you've done this before and people still hate you .
you obviousely have no life and no job and that's why you are here all day long posting under different names i honestly pity you get help soon you really need it trust me you are not normal.
 
i agree and that's why i'm off see you broken/mozfan/quentin.......the list goes on people
 
Well why do you respond to him then? 'semetery gates' is one of broken's well-known usernames
 
'Mozfan' is broken. So is 'Bored', invented to further confuse people. It's an old trick of his.
 
Re: I'm glad to see everyone so excited about the notes....

Perhaps it was because of the excitement that you didn't notice that David Hamilton was actually a Radio 1 DJ in 1974 so Morrissey wouldn't have heard that song played by him on Radio 2. It does, however, defy belief that someone like this was playing music "for the kids"

'Diddy' David Hamilton:




David_hamilt_phones.jpg
 
I like his writing style. It's quirky. A bit dark but funny. I hope he wasn't lying about writing his autobiography.
 
Thanks for sharing!

Very impressive, as were the liner notes for Under The Influence.

I'm sure we are all in for a treat when he releases his autobiography!
 
Re: Now, go buy the CD and LISTEN to it!

> THE WORD EPICINE MEANS having characteristics of both male and female.
> Jobriath was not that. Jobriath had no characteristics of either sex.
> There was an unfounded rumour that Jobriath was a man; as a child, his
> father had used him for experiments, and that his birth had never been
> recorded [presumably because nobody knew exactly what to write]. Jobriath
> was that kind of pop artist. The dead-white, greenish cast of the face on
> this CD cover should tell you as much. This is not Sacha Distel.

> Sensing my cue, I bought the first Jobriath album in 1974 at Rare Records
> in drizzle-fizzled Manchester. Neither for the ears of the elderly nor for
> those with middle-aged perspectives, Jobriath voiced the excess
> destitution of New York’ s most tormentedly aware, whose lives were
> favoured by darkness. Cinematic themes of desperate dramas in paranoid
> shadows were presented as choppy and carnivalesque melodies.

> The hairy beasts who wrote for the music press laughed Jobriath off the
> face of the planet. He was – at best – merely considered to be “insane”.
> It was clear that Jobriath was willing to go the gay distance, something
> that even the intelligentsia didn’t much care for. Elton John knew this in
> 1973; Jobriath didn’t. Surrounded on all sides by Journey, Styx, and
> Bachman-Turner Overdrive, Jobriath was at society’s mercy. Yet it could
> have worked so well.

> Jobriath was armed with what, for lack of a more useful word, we are
> forced to call talent. Studio footage from 1972 shows Jobriath as a
> disciplinarian, a classically trained pianist with a most musical voice.
> Jobriath, apparently, had it all, and meticulously crafted each twist and
> turn of his Elektra recordings with obsessively complete arrangements,
> first-rate production, outstanding backing vocals, and a Broadway Baby’s
> keen ear for gospel melody. Imagine the Eno we knew in 1973 - but one who
> could sing and actually play well. This was Jobriath. Furthermore, in
> civilian drag Jobriath was not at all bad looking, ad was at precisely the
> right age to fool all the teen magazines of America – if such a mundane
> wish had occurred to him.

> With the release of his second album, Creatures of the Street, the
> distinct atmospherics continued to work well. Jobriath’s imagination was
> the only thing that kept him alive, with hopes of something other than the
> drabness that most of us wrap ourselves up in. I was mildly shocked to
> catch the single “Street Corner Love” being played by Diddy David Hamilton
> [a small British disc jockey] on Radio 2 one mid-afternoon in 1974.

> However, neither America nor England [nor Berlin, for that matter] was
> quit ready. Ennobled by victimization, Jobriath finally had reason to be
> when Elektra booted this creature back onto the streets. He was an
> adventure that Elektra did not wish to continue to survive. While we were
> all busy looking elsewhere, Jobriath quietly expired, blotted out of all
> creation, buried without a single line of ceremony in any known music
> publication throughout the world. Death is the crossing that some artists
> must trek in order to earn themselves a decent review. Even this, in
> Jobriath’s case, might backfire. In a recent detailed book on the history
> of Elektra Records, Jobriath was not even mentioned – not even as the
> customary tagline. There is, indeed a thin line between auteurism and the
> loony bin.

> Is it really necessary to lose your mind in order to get a hit record?
> Well, yes, it is. Jobriath saw things as he wished they were; the actual
> ‘70s landscape was immaterial. Thirty years on, he is no less and
> insoluble mystery, and the songs remain hugely enjoyable.

> Sympathetic glances towards Jobriath in the ‘70s pinned him down as a sort
> of 27th-rate David Bowie. So it was to David himself that I turned for
> official comment. Did he remember Jobriath? “Oh, HIM.” Came the royal
> response, “always pushing into photographs…” and for this demonstration
> David juts out his chin, and we instantly see the impish Jobriath tagging
> on and hoping for a look in.

> -Morrissey

> March 2004

> ***********

> *Discuss*

> I think this tells us lots about Morrissey.

> I must look up meaning of "auteurism"!

Forget the pictures of Jobriath, and listen to the music.

-- then look at the pictures --
 
Re: Now, go buy the CD and LISTEN to it!

"Auteurism" was a term coined by Francois Truffaut, the film director, who was at the forefront of the French "Nouvelle Vague" cinema movement of the 50's and 60's.
It basically meant in his terms that a film director, irrespective of the contributions of others, was the "author" of a film and that stylistic traits and themes could be discerned in the director's whole canon of work.
 
Back
Top Bottom