ok this is my take on it. if anyone cares. i could see if someone reposted a pic, and defaced it out of animosity. or wrote a horrible caption above it. like if it was obvious you were being mean, and not joking around at all. what godlovesugly did i could see being bannable IF he was in any forum cept the pigsty. but he was in the pigsty and we're still all getting a feel for what we can get away with in there. so i think he shouldve just got a warning. and Ellen reposting a pic and getting banned for it was just silly.
but i mean, if you were just like 'hey isnt this person hot?" and then posted a pic, they shouldnt get banned for that, ya know?
Is this just a rule for the sake of it?
Yes,i understand the "save" and "repost" concept,but don't undesrtand WHY it's such a crime and a bannable offence.Very disappointed that you still don't understand the explaination I gave earlier.
First of all, Godlovesugly saved Scarlet's photos and reposted them in this thread which is violation of TOS.
Scarlet couldn't complain because she's on time out.
23rd December she contacted to Peter about her photos in this thread, they're removed.
However, Godlovesugly reposted them in here again changed the settings in original tinypic.com which Scarlet used.
You should read TOS Section 6: members conduct.
Very disappointed that you still don't understand the explaination I gave earlier.
First of all, Godlovesugly saved Scarlet's photos in his computer and reposted them in the thread which is violation of TOS.
Yes,i understand the "save" and "repost" concept,but don't undesrtand WHY it's such a crime and a bannable offence.
Afterall,photos are "reposted" every time they're quoted.
You cannot complain about the conditions for the time being.