"Fag," and double standards

Re: hmmm

I gave him many chances here and he blew it. It's over, deal with it.

He's on the new All U Need Is Morrissey forum, it's not like he doesn't have anywhere to go.

See that's what you don't get. YOU are the one who is going to have things to deal with. YOU get to deal with Kewpie.
Good luck with that.
 
Have we decided, can i call a fag a fag or not?

Yes, in the pigsty, but not outside the pigsty.

In the pigsty three things are not allowed to post:

- other users' personal info (including photos) without their permission

- porn

- spam ads
 
Re: set the record straight

You don't have to believe me, but I do not tell a lie and David believes my explanation.

It's so silly to keep repeating the same thing in here.
Nothing will help lifting JJ's ban for the time being, get on with it.

Well I guess some people don't think it's silly, he's been banned since April and yet his name keeps popping up doesn't it? And not by me, because I haven't been here.
So, you have the exact date and time of the PM, but not the PM? Funny.
 
Better watch out snowfallsoon..kewpie is being all..

funny-pictures-evil-plan-almost-complete.jpg
 
Re: set the record straight

You don't have to believe me, but I do not tell a lie and David believes my explanation.

It's so silly to keep repeating the same thing in here.
Nothing will help lifting JJ's ban for the time being, get on with it.

He could give a rat's ass if his ban is ever lifted. You really think he would come back? OTHER people on the forum want his ban lifted. Understand now?
 
Re: set the record straight

I had to explain David what happened, that's why I jogged my memories and able to give him the details.

On the other hand, JJ kept insisting him to find his deleted PM rather than giving him the details.

Keep repeating the same old questions which does not help lifting JJ's ban anyway.

I'm off to bed.
 
You know, there's a reason Morrissey dislikes davidt.
 
There is a reason I love ginormous canvases. That's because I am an artist.
 
What's that reason? Because I just banned someone that asked to be banned?

Not at all, and you know it. The reason Morrissey can't stand you is that your ethics are seriously flawed. You were his friend, but you chose to betray him by starting this site. You could have chosen to run this site like a decent person, but you don't. You tell yourself that it's censorship that you're against, but that's not it at all. You could choose to run Solo in a way that's relatively uncensored, yet still respectful. You choose not to. You've installed mods who are often biased and sometimes belligerent. They behave like children. They're hypocritical and dishonest. They, and you, ignore complaints and make snap judgments, and play favorites. The TOS are a joke -- the mods are free to interpret them any way they like.
If you will betray Morrissey by posting his private correspondence on this site, among other things, then what more does one need to know? Decency can't mean a thing to you. It's no wonder Solo is the way it is.
And, for god's sake, isn't it about time you removed Kewpie? Deep down you know she's a menace. It can't be loyalty that forces you to keep her on since we've all seen how loyal you were to your buddy Moz.
 
Not at all, and you know it. The reason Morrissey can't stand you is that your ethics are seriously flawed. You were his friend, but you chose to betray him by starting this site. You could have chosen to run this site like a decent person, but you don't. You tell yourself that it's censorship that you're against, but that's not it at all. You could choose to run Solo in a way that's relatively uncensored, yet still respectful. You choose not to. You've installed mods who are often biased and sometimes belligerent. They behave like children. They're hypocritical and dishonest. They, and you, ignore complaints and make snap judgments, and play favorites. The TOS are a joke -- the mods are free to interpret them any way they like.
If you will betray Morrissey by posting his private correspondence on this site, among other things, then what more does one need to know? Decency can't mean a thing to you. It's no wonder Solo is the way it is.
And, for god's sake, isn't it about time you removed Kewpie? Deep down you know she's a menace. It can't be loyalty that forces you to keep her on since we've all seen how loyal you were to your buddy Moz.


You can't have something that is 'relatively uncensored' - either something is uncensored or it is censored. If you want to be surrounded by those who only say positive things then it is better to stay at All U Need Is Morrissey, the 'respectful' site. My personal feeling is that a higher form of friendship is one who will be hard on you and actually tell you you need to get your act into shape if they feel that way. If it comes across as disrepectful then you can disregard the opinion. But if it touches a nerve I think there is something there that should be examined.

I started the site and continue to run it in support of Morrissey and contrary to your statement, we were friends after the site was started in 1997 for several years after. I am human - I have made some mistakes in the past such as posting private correspondence. It was all for supporting him, though through my excitement on spreading his word a misjudgment on my side.

Regarding your thoughts on moderators - I do not agree with your opinion, if I really thought a mod was bad I would remove them. You seem to have strong feelings on running a forum or site, have you run one before?
 
Not at all, and you know it. The reason Morrissey can't stand you is that your ethics are seriously flawed. You were his friend, but you chose to betray him by starting this site. You could have chosen to run this site like a decent person, but you don't. You tell yourself that it's censorship that you're against, but that's not it at all. You could choose to run Solo in a way that's relatively uncensored, yet still respectful. You choose not to. You've installed mods who are often biased and sometimes belligerent. They behave like children. They're hypocritical and dishonest. They, and you, ignore complaints and make snap judgments, and play favorites. The TOS are a joke -- the mods are free to interpret them any way they like.
If you will betray Morrissey by posting his private correspondence on this site, among other things, then what more does one need to know? Decency can't mean a thing to you. It's no wonder Solo is the way it is.
And, for god's sake, isn't it about time you removed Kewpie? Deep down you know she's a menace. It can't be loyalty that forces you to keep her on since we've all seen how loyal you were to your buddy Moz.

I don't know enough about the moderators to comment on your chief complaints, but I'll say this much: by creating and maintaining this site David has been a tremendous friend to Morrissey whether Morrissey realizes it or not. Without Davd Morrissey's web presence would have been nil. There are other sites which are great at offering information about Morrissey and The Smiths but none has helped Morrissey remain a "living" entity at the center of a fan community the way this web site has. Whatever mistakes were made, the good far, far outweighs the bad. Morrissey's lack of gratitude is glaring and absurd, and can only be explained if we take into account the fact that he probably doesn't understand the Internet. Fortunately for him one of his biggest fans does.
 
Last edited:
Tags
good riddance
Back
Top Bottom