You know what, research the whole thing yourself and see what you come up with. That's the best option. Think of it as a slow long term thing. Take your time and join the dots.
Easter pr0n display dismantled by rabid SWJ (Hitler would approve)
- Thread starter The Truth
- Start date
A
Anonymous
Guest
No links then?
No links.
The research must be done by yourself. If it's too much bother, stay distracted. It's the way they prefer people to be: There's Netflix, Leave the big thinking to us. We'll take care of business. You just stay down there in your idiocracy world.
People like myself are irritants who in an openly intolerant society like Soviet Russia would be disappeared into a gulag.
Last edited:
The Truth
about Ruth
You know too much! You should really get a youtube channel and link to yourself.
T
The Man of 1000 Names
Guest
Whose collected works did reelfountain have to read, to get so knowledgeable?
Last edited:
Hey, haven't you heard? We must all listen to Greta. Little Greta with her pigtails and compulsory Millennial Aspergers. She will teach us things... about things.
Fuel is bad, so it must be taxed. Lots and lots of tax on fuel.
Save the planet by making the rich richer! It's the way to go kids.
T
The Man of 1000 Names
Guest
Phrase widely attributed to Socrates, 5th century BC: "I know that I know nothing."
reelfountain, April 2019: "I know too much... why, thank you. You on the other hand, I'm afraid, know nothing."
bhops
Last of the famous international screw ups.
You're right, it was one of the most intellectually dishonest replies I've seen on these boards in awhile, and that's saying something. It boiled down to making the word 'would' and personally attacking you as some type defence of his ideas. Weird.
Maybe you're smarter than I thought...
The whole subject is definitely worth ignoring.
The Truth
about Ruth
How many did Hitler even write?
The Truth
about Ruth
"I'm on your side so why bother with facts."
bhops
Last of the famous international screw ups.
Why don't you go debate Turbanus on this subject? You seem to avoid him like the plague. You scared bro?
Hubris is a human failing I'm afraid...
The Truth
about Ruth
Don't you realize that the man with a thousand names is Turbanus?
You've said a couple of times that I'm avoiding him but what exactly should I do? Go back and have the same argument again? I laughed. That person is funny and I'm not nearly as upset about being mocked as you'd like me to be. Don't you call that banter?
Now, I know you need someone to make me feel stupid. I let you have that but when you keep repeating it I do feel I have to correct you just fr the record. Not to make you believe it or agree with it but just because.
Moving on, what happened in this thread was that Oh My cited a bunch of facts and yes maybe came off a little arrogant, but it certainly wasn't "intellectually dishonest." That's more your department when you take the stance that something you don't understand doesn't make sense, or something that would be inconvenient to reply to is "word salad." Get over it.
you choose who "won" an argument by whose side you're on or by who hurt your feelings last and that is intellectually dishonest. Don't be a snowflake. When you post something like this I have to decide whether to come back at you the same way or take into account that you seem to be kind of fragile and write it in a way that won't cause you to continue to hold a grudge forever.
That person that we're discussing is hilarious and the way they characterized my "Father Serra" post made me laugh, and NONE OF THIS MATTERS.
But yes, if you, in particular, want to talk about "intellectual dishonesty" I do sort of choke reading it.
bhops
Last of the famous international screw ups.
Don't you realize that the man with a thousand names is Turbanus?
You've said a couple of times that I'm avoiding him but what exactly should I do? Go back and have the same argument again? I laughed. That person is funny and I'm not nearly as upset about being mocked as you'd like me to be. Don't you call that banter?
Now, I know you need someone to make me feel stupid. I let you have that but when you keep repeating it I do feel I have to correct you just fr the record. Not to make you believe it or agree with it but just because.
Moving on, what happened in this thread was that Oh My cited a bunch of facts and yes maybe came off a little arrogant, but it certainly wasn't "intellectually dishonest." That's more your department when you take the stance that something you don't understand doesn't make sense, or something that would be inconvenient to reply to is "word salad." Get over it.
you choose who "won" an argument by whose side you're on or by who hurt your feelings last and that is intellectually dishonest. Don't be a snowflake. When you post something like this I have to decide whether to come back at you the same way or take into account that you seem to be kind of fragile and write it in a way that won't cause you to continue to hold a grudge forever.
That person that we're discussing is hilarious and the way they characterized my "Father Serra" post made me laugh, and NONE OF THIS MATTERS.
But yes, if you, in particular, want to talk about "intellectual dishonesty" I do sort of choke reading it.
Thanks for the wordy response. still confused that Turbanus has made 3 decent and weighty posts on this thread which you haven't really addressed head-on, I make one small comment agreeing with him and you're all over it, LOL. Pretty much tells me all I need to know.
The Truth
about Ruth
Thanks for the wordy response. still confused that Turbanus has made 3 decent and weighty posts on this thread which you haven't really addressed head-on, I make one small comment agreeing with him and you're all over it, LOL. Pretty much tells me all I need to know.
"haven't really addressed head-on" so instead of "#NoLinksBro" you would have preferred a "wordy response?"
I guess I could see every argument that person is in as a chance to take the other side, maybe accusing him of being intellectually dishonest or something?
bhops
Last of the famous international screw ups.
Yep, a weighty post such as Turbsnus's deserves a wordy response. My two sentence observations, not do much ;-) Of course we both know that's not gonna happen, LOL."haven't really addressed head-on" so instead of "#NoLinksBro" you would have preferred a "wordy response?"
I guess I could see every argument that person is in as a chance to take the other side, maybe accusing him of being intellectually dishonest or something?
The Truth
about Ruth
Actually this exchange makes me look more like the idiot you think I'm afraid to expose myself as because I'm trying to honestly use reason with you. You win.
