Re: Oh yes, the 'Mike Joyce/ Andy Rourke case'
I was with Morrissey on that too. I'm glad Morrissey still doesn't pay Joyce. Morrissey has not let me down. Morrissey has been let down too many times by people near him. I don't know what purpose the posting of 'those rumours' had. It doesn't sit well on a 'fan site'. Was thiss David T's attempt to make his site some version of a reality TV show? - "Yeah, lets throw in some controversy and see what happens, something that'll really upset Morrissey".
& yes, I do think about all the time and money and effort David has put into his site and it makes it less obvious why he posted those malicious rumours.
Re: "He could have dealt with this like a gentleman, and not resorted
> to bullyish litigation"
David T could have been a gentleman and not posted the stuff in the first place, but oh no he had to do it. What for? The sort of so-called "freedom of speach" that's enough to make a person ill.
> Tingle ... I'm surprised that such a sycophantic post would come from
> someone as well-versed in Smithdom as you. The history of The Smiths and
> Morrissey is one littered with unpaid debts, poor management and friends
> cast aside. You only need to look at the Mike Joyce case, and how
> Morrissey still refuses to pay what was legally demanded from him.
> I love Morrissey as a lyricist, a performer and an icon ... but
> business-wise, I'd trust him as far as I could throw him. You can love and
> respect someone for their music, and still disagree with their actions.
> Think of all the time & money David Tseng has put into this site ...
> do you really think he would have posted that article if it as only a
> "rumour". David isn't stupid, and has been in contact with
> members of Morrissey's entourage. I think the facts speak for themselves.
> Morrissey knows David ... they've had a reasonable amount of contact in
> the past. He could have dealt with this like a gentleman, and not resorted
> to bullyish litigation.