Crisstti
Well-Known Member
I would like to know how exactly, the very real situation of a woman being legally threatened with prison for saying men cannot become women, does not “represent the true picture”.I once worked in a gender reassignment clinic. Many years ago. That now seems so straightforward compared to what people demand today. Gender can certainly be altered, by knife, hormone, medication, etc. I don’t ever recall the NHS (in this case) ever offering to “change sex”. That’s legally and medically not on the table. Just to clarify, my role was an organising one, not clinical.
In terms of people having their livelihood and liberty taken for expressing a view, I neither support this, nor do I believe that this is a widespread issue. There are always these extreme cases that definitely do not represent the true picture.
We agree that the basis of the argument is an old one. Yet, we are in a Brave New World situation, with science offering previously unimaginable choices. Medical Ethics is supposed to regulate, but I’m not sure how effectively, to be honest. How we deliver and manage people as they seek to make these choices has never been so important. It’s just so much more complicated an issue now, with knock on effects being felt in general society. Do the many change, for the good of a few? Should we have to stop and think about gender loaded language that we’ve been getting along ok with so far? And what about protected spaces for Women?
We need a grown up, respectful conversation, that addresses these questions and the many other far more central issues. I can’t see one on the horizon though.
This kind of thing is actually happening. Free speech, and the right to say 2 + 2 = 4, are being threatened by the law and the judicial system. Not to mention by the gender ideology mob. And it will keep happening and it will get worse if we hide our heads in the sand and pretend it is not happening.
Last edited: