Cracking new Morrissey interview - full transcript here

Do you like the interview?

  • yes

    Votes: 12 70.6%
  • no

    Votes: 5 29.4%
  • don't know

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    17
That show got cancelled with extreme prejudice.

LOL.

7393172_ori.jpg
 
I don't know what A level means. I'm from America where we have grades, and stuff.

Dude, I am not insensitive to the suffering of animals. I have a cat dying of feline leikemia. Even with meds she is in a great deal of pain every day, but we cannot put her down because she is like family to us.

Don't believe me? This is growing very tiresome...your obtuse stubborn petulance.

Listen, man. Listen, Smiler my boy. I will, I repeat I WILL POST A PICTURE of my terminally ill cat right here, on this page, in this thread, just to win this argument.

Don't think I won't. I'll do it, man. That's how I roll.


Sorry to hear about your cat, Skylarker.
 
Pics or it didn't happen.


Pics of sick cats ? Or non -sick cats ? Don't tell me Skylarker will purposely sicken his cats in order to have sick cat pics to post ... :eek: !!!


Hmm ...Peter Piper picked a peck of pickled peppers, Peter Piper picked a peck ......
 
Last edited:
Pics of sick cats ? Or non -sick cats ? Don't tell me Skylarker will purposely sicken his cats in order to have sick cat pics to post ... :eek: !!!


Hmm ...Peter Piper picked a peck of pickled peppers, Peter Piper picked a peck ......

It's an inside joke.
 
Yeah but it was mostly Jews. And you're nitpicking the details when the argument is about principles. And plently isn't a word.

Yes, we humans can eat without eating animals, but we shouldn't have to. No other animals have morals like this...they do what nature dictates, to survive. We shouldn't be any different. It's a process. A foodchain. We are not above it just because we have Priuses and hi-speed internet. All our progress and technology could go IN A HEARTBEAT. We would still need to kill and harvest and eat. It's primal and ancient and real.

I don't believe in cruelty to animals for sport. But just because there is suffering involved in killing animals so that humans can eat, well, that doesn't make it wrong. Life is full of misery and suffering.

We've killed animals for centuries and centuries and centuries and centuries...killed them to eat, to stay warm with their skins. Deal with it. It's ugly and unfortunate but that's life.

Don't be such a namby-pamby, Smiler.

So what?
So what?
And so the f*** what?

Hey -- what do you know? --being unreasonbable, brief and unpleasant is pretty liberating.

I'm liking this. :D::o:sick:
 
So what?
So what?
And so the f*** what?

Hey -- what do you know? --being unreasonbable, brief and unpleasant is pretty liberating.

I'm liking this. :D::o:sick:

Well then by all means please take over, as I think everyone else is pretty f***ing bored of discussing this.
 
Well then by all means please take over, as I think everyone else is pretty f***ing bored of discussing this.

The moment someone posts a single intelligent, coherent and compelling argument for the killing and eating of animals simply because they taste nice when scorched, I will snorkel-up and plunge into the discussion head-first. Until then, why on Earth would I attempt to have an adult discussion with you kids?
 
The moment someone posts a single intelligent, coherent and compelling argument for the killing and eating of animals simply because they taste nice when scorched, I will snorkel-up and plunge into the discussion head-first. Until then, why on Earth would I attempt to have an adult discussion with you kids?

Go to Africa and try to convince a lion why he's better off physically and morally just eating some plants and vegetables than he is a gazelle. What sense is it to feel protective over animals when a vast number of them kill lesser species for sustenance? Why is it OK for it to happen in nature but not with humans? Because we do it in mass and sell it to people? If so, does that mean you WOULDN'T have a problem with it if everyone went out with a spear and killed their food on their own without it being just a "product"?

And drop the whole bullshit superiority nonsense...it makes you, perhaps appropriately, look like a jackass.
 
The moment someone posts a single intelligent, coherent and compelling argument for the killing and eating of animals simply because they taste nice when scorched, I will snorkel-up and plunge into the discussion head-first. Until then, why on Earth would I attempt to have an adult discussion with you kids?

Good point.
Some of the arguments on here are embarrassing. Lions kill things so it's OK for us to follow their morals? A lion would kill a person if put in the same room, does that make it OK for a person to do the same? No, that's called murder. We don't follow animals 'morals' because they have none, they have instinct. Humans have ethical judgement. Do these same people eat cats because they kill mice?
 
Go to Africa and try to convince a lion why he's better off physically and morally just eating some plants and vegetables than he is a gazelle. What sense is it to feel protective over animals when a vast number of them kill lesser species for sustenance? Why is it OK for it to happen in nature but not with humans? Because we do it in mass and sell it to people? If so, does that mean you WOULDN'T have a problem with it if everyone went out with a spear and killed their food on their own without it being just a "product"?

And drop the whole bullshit superiority nonsense...it makes you, perhaps appropriately, look like a jackass.

Oh dear. Is this your attempt at an intelligent, coherent and compelling argument for killing and eating animals? It's difficult not to appear superior in the face of such inane, intellectually flaccid drivel. Which is a shame because you seem reasonably bright and more than capable of coming up with something a little more worthwhile.

That adult discussion seems further away than ever.
 
Oh dear. Is this your attempt at an intelligent, coherent and compelling argument for killing and eating animals? It's difficult not to appear superior in the face of such inane, intellectually flaccid drivel. Which is a shame because you seem reasonably bright and more than capable of coming up with something a little more worthwhile.

That adult discussion seems further away than ever.

So, let me get this straight...your idea of an argument is to claim you and your ideas are superior, yet never state why with any form of an opinion or factual evidence, and ignore or dismiss everyone else and their ideas without even referencing what you find flawed with them, then claim superiority yet again?

You're a twit. The closest you could come to anything remotely "adult" is a porn site. Please go drive out to the middle of nowhere and lock yourself in the trunk.
 
So, let me get this straight...your idea of an argument is to claim you and your ideas are superior, yet never state why with any form of an opinion or factual evidence, and ignore or dismiss everyone else and their ideas without even referencing what you find flawed with them, then claim superiority yet again?

You're a twit. The closest you could come to anything remotely "adult" is a porn site. Please go drive out to the middle of nowhere and lock yourself in the trunk.

Like I said, you seem reasonably bright. You must know that your ‘go to Africa and try to convince a lion’ challenge is infantile. Why would I (or anyone) bother to mount a counterargument? I think it's beneath me. If that makes me a twit (harsh) then I'm a twit. I'll survive. Somehow.

Christ, I’ve already wasted far too much time on this bollocks. Think I’ll go back to lurking.
 
Back
Top Bottom